gauss_full Medes (2x Xen Silver 4110, 192 GB RAM, RAID 10) Sampling of a few benchmarks: Processor: Intel Xeon D-1521 @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10SDV-4C-TLN2F v2.00, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 1.96875 x 32768 MB DDR4-2400MT/s Samsung, Disk: 1919GB MR9271-4i, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel Connection X552/X557-AT OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-99-generic (x86_64), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 medes_full: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Silver 4110 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: Quanta Cloud S5B-MB (LBG-4), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 12 x 16384 MB DDR4-2666MT/s Samsung, Disk: 11GB, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel Connection X722 for 10GBASE-T OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-96-generic (x86_64), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 967.16 |================================== medes_full ................... 1119.49 |======================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 359.86 |================================= medes_full ................... 434.51 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 198.93 |=================================== medes_full ................... 228.86 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3115.05 |=================================== medes_full ................... 3497.48 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5669.90 |============================= medes_full ................... 7662.37 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5492.83 |=================================== medes_full ................... 6045.30 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5789.30 |============================ medes_full ................... 7986.83 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4948.00 |================================ medes_full ................... 5963.57 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4925.37 |================================= medes_full ................... 5801.73 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4824.87 |=============================== medes_full ................... 5985.40 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4954.63 |================================= medes_full ................... 5920.37 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4458.90 |============================ medes_full ................... 6166.10 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4214.67 |============================== medes_full ................... 5569.97 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4124.83 |============================== medes_full ................... 5324.03 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4761.97 |=============================== medes_full ................... 5996.73 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4551.33 |============================== medes_full ................... 5856.73 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4454.43 |============================== medes_full ................... 5806.27 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3758.97 |================================== medes_full ................... 4374.27 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3499.13 |================================ medes_full ................... 4284.37 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3317.87 |================================= medes_full ................... 3914.07 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 7940.73 |============================= medes_full ................... 10554.00 |====================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 11381 |==================================== medes_full ................... 12791 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18684 |================================ medes_full ................... 24268 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 19100 |=============================== medes_full ................... 25625 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 12774.00 |=================================== medes_full ................... 13784.18 |====================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 20387 |=================================== medes_full ................... 23556 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 27669 |====================================== medes_full ................... 29630 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18291 |================================== medes_full ................... 22165 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18218 |========================================= medes_full ................... 16998 |====================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18978 |========================================= medes_full ................... 17377 |====================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 30288 |========================================= medes_full ................... 26753 |==================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 26598 |========================================= medes_full ................... 23252 |==================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 24244 |========================================= medes_full ................... 23324 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 15586 |========================================= medes_full ................... 15471 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 13125 |========================================= medes_full ................... 11796 |===================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 12517 |========================================= medes_full ................... 12433 |========================================= Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 11.26 |========================================= medes_full ................... 7.23 |========================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5.40 |========================================== medes_full ................... 3.79 |============================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 436.49 |====================================== medes_full ................... 461.90 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 94.51 |======================================= medes_full ................... 98.65 |========================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 140.01 |==================================== medes_full ................... 156.56 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 463.44 |================================== medes_full ................... 539.95 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 593.63 |==================================== medes_full ................... 666.73 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 890.29 |======================================== medes_full ................... 847.57 |====================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 929113 |======================================== medes_full ................... 937656 |======================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 2586.78 |====================================== medes_full ................... 2657.17 |======================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 16173 |============ medes_full ................... 55944 |========================================= Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 7581375 |========== medes_full ................... 28128074 |====================================== Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 288.69 |======================================== medes_full ................... 97.81 |============== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 298.30 |======================================== medes_full ................... 76.56 |========== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 56.12 |========================================= medes_full ................... 54.10 |======================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 66.24 |========================================= medes_full ................... 28.15 |================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 15.72 |========================================= medes_full ................... 12.62 |================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 13.39 |========================================= medes_full ................... 12.47 |====================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 324.58 |======================================== medes_full ................... 86.35 |=========== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 783.03 |========== medes_full ................... 2920.03 |======================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 100.97 |======================================== medes_full ................... 90.70 |==================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 49.89 |========================================= medes_full ................... 42.73 |=================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 548.89 |======================================== medes_full ................... 501.02 |===================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 1528.77 |======================================= medes_full ................... 1322.81 |================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 117.03 |====================================== medes_full ................... 123.16 |======================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 21.68 |========================================= medes_full ................... 21.08 |======================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better Sampling of a few benchmarks . 45.25 |====================================== medes_full ................... 49.11 |=========================================