xeon-w-3275m

Intel Xeon W-3275M testing with a Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2004229-VE-XEONW327524
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 7 Tests
CPU Massive 20 Tests
Creator Workloads 8 Tests
Encoding 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 4 Tests
Common Kernel Benchmarks 2 Tests
Multi-Core 16 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
OpenCL 2 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Raytracing 2 Tests
Renderers 5 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 16 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 9 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
xeon w-3275m
April 16 2020
  1 Hour, 7 Minutes
intel xeon w-3275m
April 16 2020
  3 Minutes
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti
April 16 2020
  7 Hours, 5 Minutes
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti
April 18 2020
  57 Minutes
xeon w-3275m C-RAY
April 22 2020
  2 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  1 Hour, 51 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


xeon-w-3275m Intel Xeon W-3275M testing with a Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. xeon w-3275m: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 intel xeon w-3275m: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 xeon w-3275m C-RAY: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better intel xeon w-3275m ..... 39.09 |=============================================== xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 38.56 |============================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m ................................. 12.68 |========================= workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 12.76 |========================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m ................................. 8.395 |========================= workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 8.444 |========================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 74.81 |========================= workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 74.53 |========================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 212.34 |======================== workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 212.70 |======================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 302.50 |======================== workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 302.98 |======================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m ................................. 48874.57 |====================== workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 48918.12 |====================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m C-RAY . 29.07 |=================================================== BRL-CAD 7.28.0 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 237143 |======================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 17994040.14 |=================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 772888586 |===================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 3971.19 |======================= x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 47.42 |========================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1.818013 |====================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 3021.31 |======================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 289.92 |======================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 6254.45 |======================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 390.90 |======================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 7507.52 |======================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 74.88 |========================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 33261 |=============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1047.04 |============================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 263.63 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1050.46 |============================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 283.17 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 517.61 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 957.03 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 301.06 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 117.33 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 344.43 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 504.12 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 954.14 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 298.10 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 529.35 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 71.59 |=============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 146.10 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 344.45 |============================================== Blender 2.79a Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 421.3 |========================================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 107 |=========================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 6791.1 |======================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 214.53 |======================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 644.08 |======================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 874.04 |======================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 65482790 |====================================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 59784694 |====================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 131968 |======================================================== x265 3.0 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 41.44 |========================================================= x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 141.13 |======================================================== NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 0.75930 |======================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 33.66 |=========================================================