xeon-w-3275m Intel Xeon W-3275M testing with a Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. xeon w-3275m: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 intel xeon w-3275m: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 xeon w-3275m C-RAY: Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m ................................. 12.68 |========================= workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 12.76 |========================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m ................................. 8.395 |========================= workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 8.444 |========================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 0.75930 |======================================================= x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 141.13 |======================================================== x265 3.0 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 41.44 |========================================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 131968 |======================================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 59784694 |====================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 65482790 |====================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 874.04 |======================================================== POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 33.66 |========================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 644.08 |======================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 214.53 |======================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m . 6791.1 |======================================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 107 |=========================================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m ................................. 48874.57 |====================== workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 48918.12 |====================== Blender 2.79a Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m . 421.3 |========================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better intel xeon w-3275m ..... 39.09 |=============================================== xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 38.56 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 344.45 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 74.81 |========================= workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 74.53 |========================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 146.10 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 71.59 |=============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 529.35 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 298.10 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 954.14 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 504.12 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 344.43 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 212.34 |======================== workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 212.70 |======================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 117.33 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 302.50 |======================== workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 302.98 |======================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 301.06 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 957.03 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 517.61 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 283.17 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1050.46 |============================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 263.63 |============================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1047.04 |============================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 33261 |=============================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 74.88 |========================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 7507.52 |======================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 390.90 |======================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 6254.45 |======================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 289.92 |======================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 3021.31 |======================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1.818013 |====================== x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 47.42 |========================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 3971.19 |======================= Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 772888586 |===================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 17994040.14 |=================== BRL-CAD 7.28.0 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 237143 |======================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better xeon w-3275m C-RAY . 29.07 |===================================================