Intel Xeon W-3275M testing with a Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2004181-VE-XEONW327525
xeon-w-3275m
Intel Xeon W-3275M testing with a Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
xeon w-3275m:
Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
intel xeon w-3275m:
Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti:
Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti:
Processor: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 4.60GHz (28 Cores / 56 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPA-T v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 2 x 1024GB Samsung SSD 970 PRO 1TB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC888-VD, Monitor: BenQ SW271, Network: Intel I210 + Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-46-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.50, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 107 |===========================================================
BRL-CAD 7.28.0
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 237143 |========================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 3971.19 |=======================
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1.818013 |======================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m ................................. 12.68 |=========================
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 12.76 |=========================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m ................................. 8.395 |=========================
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 8.444 |=========================
NAMD 2.13b1
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 0.75930 |=======================================================
Stockfish 9
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 59784694 |======================================================
7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 131968 |========================================================
asmFish 2018-07-23
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 65482790 |======================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 8.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 874.04 |========================================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m ................................. 48874.57 |======================
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 48918.12 |======================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 17994040.14 |===================
Swet 1.5.16
Average
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 772888586 |=====================
x264 2018-09-25
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 141.13 |========================================================
x265 3.0
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 41.44 |=========================================================
x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 47.42 |=========================
Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07
Mode: CPU
Ksamples > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 33261 |===============================================
Blender 2.79a
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 421.3 |=========================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
intel xeon w-3275m ..... 39.09 |===============================================
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 38.56 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 344.45 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 74.81 |=========================
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 74.53 |=========================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 146.10 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 71.59 |===============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 529.35 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 298.10 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 954.14 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 504.12 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 344.43 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 212.34 |========================
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 212.70 |========================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 117.33 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti ....................... 302.50 |========================
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 302.98 |========================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 301.06 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 957.03 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 517.61 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 283.17 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1050.46 |=============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 263.63 |==============================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: NVIDIA OptiX
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 1047.04 |=============================================
POV-Ray 3.7.0.7
Trace Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 33.66 |=========================================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: Serial
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 644.08 |========================================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 214.53 |========================================================
OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
xeon w-3275m . 6791.1 |========================================================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 74.88 |=========================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 7507.52 |=======================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 390.90 |========================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 6254.45 |=======================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 289.92 |========================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better
workstation benchmark xeon w-3275m/rtx2080ti . 3021.31 |=======================