AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0702 BIOS) and llvmpipe 63GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2003108-PTS-BIGTHREA46
Big Threadripper
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0702 BIOS) and llvmpipe 63GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Threadripper 3970X:
Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Force MP600, Graphics: llvmpipe 63GB, Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + Clang 9.0.0-2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
16 Cores:
Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Force MP600, Graphics: llvmpipe 63GB, Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + Clang 9.0.0-2, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 196186 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 78488 |====================
ACES DGEMM 1.0
Sustained Floating-Point Rate
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.868534 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 4.666959 |====================
Aircrack-ng 1.5.2
k/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 112289.30 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 54172.20 |=======================
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark
Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 24786.28 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 26671.34 |================================================
AOBench
Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 31.71 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 31.73 |===================================================
AOM AV1 2020-01-10
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 40.88 |=================================
16 Cores ........... 62.37 |===================================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.29
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 36286.78 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 41019.20 |================================================
Apache Cassandra 3.11.4
Test: Reads
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20360 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 3166 |========
Apache Cassandra 3.11.4
Test: Writes
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 293003 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 7744 |=
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 418033 |============================================
16 Cores ........... 475673 |==================================================
Apache HBase 2.2.3
Test: Random Write - Clients: 16
Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 72 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 81 |======================================================
Apache Siege 2.4.29
Concurrent Users: 250
Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 55626.42 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 54186.82 |===============================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Emily
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 138.48 |========================
16 Cores ........... 289.31 |==================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Disney Material
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 70.30 |========================
16 Cores ........... 146.68 |==================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Material Tester
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 131.52 |=====================================
16 Cores ........... 176.69 |==================================================
ArrayFire 3.7
Test: BLAS CPU
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 802.01 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 481.37 |==============================
ArrayFire 3.7
Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 25.18 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 23.52 |================================================
ASKAP 2018-11-10
Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2651.59 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2306.50 |===========================================
ASKAP 2018-11-10
Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3738.11 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3463.50 |=============================================
ASKAP 2018-11-10
Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2682.40 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2368.48 |===========================================
ASKAP 2018-11-10
Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3795.21 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3544.17 |==============================================
ASKAP 2018-11-10
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4771.16 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3330.88 |==================================
ASKAP 2018-11-10
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3764.47 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3482.69 |=============================================
asmFish 2018-07-23
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 95916197 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 37415509 |===================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared
ns < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 19 |======================================================
16 Cores ........... 19 |======================================================
BenchmarkMutex
Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire
ns < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11 |======================================================
16 Cores ........... 11 |======================================================
BLAKE2 20170307
Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.35 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 8.54 |====================================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 40.40 |=====================
16 Cores ........... 97.69 |===================================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 109.39 |===================
16 Cores ........... 283.82 |==================================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 67.04 |=====================
16 Cores ........... 163.13 |==================================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 159.93 |===================
16 Cores ........... 430.81 |==================================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 146.02 |===================
16 Cores ........... 382.22 |==================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 47.57 |====================
16 Cores ........... 119.58 |==================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 119.47 |===================
16 Cores ........... 314.82 |==================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 71.28 |====================
16 Cores ........... 178.46 |==================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 194.17 |===================
16 Cores ........... 501.07 |==================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 153.88 |===================
16 Cores ........... 414.42 |==================================================
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Read
Final Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1260198 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 1283483 |=================================================
BlogBench 1.1
Test: Write
Final Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 49874 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11700 |============
Bork File Encrypter 1.4
File Encryption Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.121 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 8.556 |===================================================
Botan 2.13.0
Test: KASUMI
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 100.10 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 99.85 |==================================================
Botan 2.13.0
Test: AES-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5902.14 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 5858.03 |=================================================
Botan 2.13.0
Test: Twofish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 391.43 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 385.68 |=================================================
Botan 2.13.0
Test: Blowfish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 475.10 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 471.10 |==================================================
Botan 2.13.0
Test: CAST-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 154.15 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 154.99 |==================================================
BRL-CAD 7.28.0
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 507345 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 210066 |=====================
Build2 0.12
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 49.58 |===================================
16 Cores ........... 71.88 |===================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: Raytests
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.106475 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.127226 |================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: 3000 Fall
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.394250 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 3.428156 |================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: 1000 Stack
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.094888 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 4.132133 |================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: 1000 Convex
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.787201 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 3.822767 |================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: 136 Ragdolls
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.173580 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.195278 |================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: Prim Trimesh
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.796787 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 0.804927 |================================================
Bullet Physics Engine 2.81
Test: Convex Trimesh
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.952042 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 0.961552 |================================================
BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6
Computational Test: Dhrystone 2
LPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 44416335.2 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 42231623.5 |============================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 16.38 |========================
16 Cores ........... 34.16 |===================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3035.03 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3024.68 |=================================================
CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 31832.50 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 31631.79 |================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 61162.94 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 61009.39 |================================================
Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07
Mode: CPU
Ksamples > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 45841 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 20433 |=======================
CLOMP 3.3
Static OMP Speedup
Speedup > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.71 |============
16 Cores ........... 3.04 |====================================================
CloverLeaf
Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.05 |===========================================
16 Cores ........... 1.26 |====================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 716.22 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 548.75 |======================================
Coremark 1.0
CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second
Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1331439.75 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 508354.40 |==================
CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1
Fayalite-FIST Data
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 494.65 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 423.75 |===========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Atol
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 58.06 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 58.99 |===================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Ctype
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 32.17 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 32.38 |===================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Math Library
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 273.23 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 275.73 |==================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Random Numbers
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1110.91 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1115.82 |=================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Vector
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 77.19 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 78.89 |===================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Function Objects
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 14.87 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 14.98 |===================================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Abstraction
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 28.62 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 28.87 |===================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1
Algorithm: m7m
kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1624.30 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 654.62 |====================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1
Algorithm: deep
kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 29323.00 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 6879.91 |===========
Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1
Algorithm: lbry
kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 89853 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 41063 |=======================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1
Algorithm: skein
kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 102703 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 49073 |========================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1
Algorithm: myr-gr
kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13923.00 |===========================================
16 Cores ........... 15369.09 |================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1
Algorithm: sha256t
kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 223623 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 106950 |========================
Crafty 25.2
Elapsed Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8892788 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 8869846 |=================================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Keyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 696.16 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 693.03 |==================================================
ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 148 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 185 |=====================================================
Cython benchmark 0.27
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 40.86 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 39.94 |==================================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3886 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 2606 |===================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4023 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 3921 |===================================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3301 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 3219 |===================================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradebeans
msec < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4496 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 2452 |============================
Darktable 2.6.0
Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6.010 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.060 |===========================================
Darktable 2.6.0
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.088 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 3.746 |===================================================
Darktable 2.6.0
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.120 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 0.097 |=========================================
Darktable 2.6.0
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.991 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.057 |===================================================
dav1d 0.5.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 324.66 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 205.50 |================================
dav1d 0.5.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 726.09 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 556.99 |======================================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 12
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 595.26 |====================
16 Cores ........... 1466.07 |=================================================
Dbench 4.0
Client Count: 12
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 665.37 |========================
16 Cores ........... 1382.09 |=================================================
dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 39.66 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 39.43 |===================================================
DeepSpeech 0.6
Acceleration: CPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 56.68 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 49.10 |============================================
ebizzy 0.3
Records/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2542372 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1284378 |=========================
Embree 3.6.1
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 37.66 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 13.23 |==================
Embree 3.6.1
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 35.55 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 12.83 |==================
eSpeak Speech Engine 1.48.04
Text-To-Speech Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 27.35 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 27.91 |===================================================
Ethr 2019-01-02
Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1844.58 |===========================
16 Cores ........... 3314.79 |=================================================
Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6
Test: Random Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1083225 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 606976 |===========================
Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6
Test: Random Read
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 180626444 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 72774397 |===================
Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6
Test: Sequential Fill
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1147975 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 702809 |==============================
Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6
Test: Random Fill Sync
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 29167 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 9106 |================
Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6
Test: Read While Writing
Op/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6204076 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2381360 |===================
FFmpeg 4.0.2
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.331 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.041 |===================================
FFTE 6.0
Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9483.92 |=================================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6875.5 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 6841.8 |==================================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 21610 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 21534 |===================================================
Fhourstones 3.1
Complex Connect-4 Solving
Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 14702.3 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 15067.4 |=================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.761 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 7.776 |===================================================
Flexible IO Tester
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 14400 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11600 |=========================================
Flexible IO Tester
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 263667 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 277000 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 459333 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 364333 |========================================
Flexible IO Tester
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 307000 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 320333 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 56.2 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 45.2 |==========================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
16 Cores ........... 1082 |====================================================
Threadripper 3970X . 1030 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 1068 |===================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
16 Cores ........... 1424 |=========================================
Threadripper 3970X . 1794 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1442 |==========================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
16 Cores ........... 1251 |====================================================
Threadripper 3970X . 1200 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 1246 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
16 Cores . 11600 |=============================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
16 Cores . 273333 |============================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
16 Cores . 369000 |============================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.12
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: POSIX AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
16 Cores . 319333 |============================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Random Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1151 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1234 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Random Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 294333 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 315733 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Random Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 706 |============================
16 Cores ........... 1309 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Random Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 180633 |===========================
16 Cores ........... 335000 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Sequential Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1346 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 1553 |====================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Sequential Read - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 344533 |===========================================
16 Cores ........... 397600 |==================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Sequential Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1052 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 961 |================================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.18
Type: Sequential Write - Engine: IO_uring - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 269200 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 245750 |==============================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 576.3 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 611.7 |===================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 485.9 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 602.3 |===================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 560.7 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 633.2 |===================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2724.8 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 2012.9 |=====================================
GEGL
Operation: Crop
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.003 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 7.491 |================================================
GEGL
Operation: Scale
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5.661 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 4.940 |=============================================
GEGL
Operation: Cartoon
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 90.95 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 88.68 |==================================================
GEGL
Operation: Reflect
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 29.98 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 29.41 |==================================================
GEGL
Operation: Antialias
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 39.00 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 36.36 |================================================
GEGL
Operation: Tile Glass
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 31.03 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 28.69 |===============================================
GEGL
Operation: Wavelet Blur
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 62.40 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 60.11 |=================================================
GEGL
Operation: Color Enhance
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 56.07 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 55.43 |==================================================
GEGL
Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 38.17 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 37.69 |==================================================
GIMP 2.10.8
Test: resize
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.470 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 6.923 |==========================================
GIMP 2.10.8
Test: rotate
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12.44 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.19 |==============================================
GIMP 2.10.8
Test: auto-levels
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 16.99 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 12.77 |======================================
GIMP 2.10.8
Test: unsharp-mask
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20.17 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 15.12 |======================================
Git
Time To Complete Common Git Commands
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.914 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.018 |===================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: cos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 42.25 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 42.81 |===================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: exp
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.99317 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 4.95189 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffs
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.75870 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.78754 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sin
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 42.04 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 42.28 |===================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: log2
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5.88218 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.89799 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: modf
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.23442 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.25415 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sinh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.79696 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 7.82957 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sqrt
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.22027 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.23979 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: tanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.68 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 10.72 |===================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: asinh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.41835 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 8.53711 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: atanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.09 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 10.20 |===================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffsll
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.75897 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.77800 |=================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sincos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12.26 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 12.41 |===================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: pthread_once
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.76133 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.77594 |=================================================
GNU GMP GMPbench 6.1.2
Total Time
GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5794.6 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 5767.1 |==================================================
GNU MPC 1.1.0
Multi-Precision Benchmark
Global Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9050 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 9013 |====================================================
GNU Octave Benchmark 4.4.1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13.07 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 10.58 |=========================================
GnuPG
Linux 4.3 Package File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12.38 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 12.47 |===================================================
GnuPG 1.4.22
2GB File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11.43 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.47 |===================================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: http
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7825 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 4059 |===========================
Go Benchmarks
Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1564168 |======================
16 Cores ........... 3523585 |=================================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20067677101 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 17244462905 |=======================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 589712 |=================================
16 Cores ........... 897936 |==================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1590 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 784 |==========================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 693 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 732 |=====================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 468 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 252 |=============================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 669 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 357 |============================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2243 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1847 |===========================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 631 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 351 |=============================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1499 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1417 |=================================================
GROMACS 2020
Water Benchmark
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.288 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.048 |================================
Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 33.91 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 34.07 |===================================================
Hackbench
Count: 32 - Type: Process
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 31.39 |======================
16 Cores ........... 74.35 |===================================================
Hierarchical INTegration 1.0
Test: FLOAT
QUIPs > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 386120425.42 |============================================
16 Cores ........... 381206340.37 |===========================================
High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.67070 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 9.97276 |=============================================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4607.31 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 4880.02 |=================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 73.20 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 89.99 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 16.12 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.17 |===================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 29.80 |===============================
16 Cores ........... 49.58 |===================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.44119 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.12629 |==============
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.90348 |===========================
16 Cores ........... 3.47614 |=================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.17138 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 0.11362 |================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.46962 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 0.40788 |===========================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.20814 |===========================
16 Cores ........... 3.97686 |=================================================
HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 21719.65 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 22271.54 |================================================
IndigoBench 4.0.64
Scene: Bedroom
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.906 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.852 |===================
IndigoBench 4.0.64
Scene: Supercar
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9.317 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 4.106 |======================
Inkscape
Operation: SVG Files To PNG
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 26.27 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 25.26 |=================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 17789641.38 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 9362495.74 |========================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6258.07 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 7217.49 |=================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 149.28 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 104.95 |===================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5106.63 |===========================================
16 Cores ........... 5828.12 |=================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4955.00 |=======================================
16 Cores ........... 6263.73 |=================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 82.61 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 63.49 |=======================================
Intel Open Image Denoise 1.0.0
Scene: Memorial
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 21.96 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 14.97 |===================================
IOR 3.2.1
Write Test
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 182.76 |===============
16 Cores ........... 622.53 |==================================================
IOR 3.2.1
Read Test
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1047.58 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 1117.52 |=================================================
IOzone 3.465
Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1554.84 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1335.37 |==========================================
IOzone 3.465
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1594.31 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1283.87 |=======================================
IOzone 3.465
Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1677.55 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1361.61 |========================================
IOzone 3.465
Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1529.57 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1280.55 |=========================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3578760 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 3705204 |=================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3558893 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 3701949 |=================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3388324 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3353946 |=================================================
IPC_benchmark
Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2416213 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 2555431 |=================================================
iPerf 3.7
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 54840 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 47216 |============================================
iPerf 3.7
Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64
Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 67.1 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 67.1 |====================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3009.12 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3005.07 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1686.79 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1679.21 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2043.32 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2040.93 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2683.18 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 2716.60 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6674.41 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 6637.13 |=================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1957.92 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1951.48 |=================================================
John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 43255 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 26111 |===============================
John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2520750 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1626000 |================================
KeyDB 5.3.1
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 119630.18 |==================================
16 Cores ........... 167550.10 |===============================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.188 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 7.182 |===================================================
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 17.27 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 12.75 |======================================
LeelaChessZero 0.23.2
Backend: BLAS
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2105.11 |============================
16 Cores ........... 3630.24 |=================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Hot Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 44.286 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 8.974 |==========
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Fill Sync
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.6 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.0 |===============
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Fill Sync
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1938.17 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1677.71 |==========================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Overwrite
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 26.8 |===================================
16 Cores ........... 40.3 |====================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Overwrite
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 263.94 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 43.85 |========
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Fill
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 27.3 |===================================
16 Cores ........... 40.3 |====================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 259.84 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 43.87 |========
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 44.353 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 9.313 |==========
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Seek Random
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 68.59 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 14.89 |===========
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Delete
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 256.44 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 39.90 |========
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 27.6 |==================================
16 Cores ........... 41.8 |====================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 256.33 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 42.30 |========
libgav1 2019-10-05
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 76.46 |====================================
16 Cores ........... 105.76 |==================================================
libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2
Test: Decompression Throughput
Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 218.90 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 218.34 |==================================================
LibreOffice
Test: 20 Documents To PDF
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6.663 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 6.541 |==================================================
librsvg
Operation: SVG Files To PNG
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 23.87 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 18.68 |========================================
Loopback TCP Network Performance
Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.40 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 10.81 |===================================================
LuaJIT 2.1-git
Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1659.51 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1624.14 |================================================
LuaJIT 2.1-git
Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 526.75 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 515.37 |=================================================
LuaJIT 2.1-git
Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 287.97 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 278.18 |================================================
LuaJIT 2.1-git
Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1352.77 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1319.00 |================================================
LuaJIT 2.1-git
Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3996.69 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3910.40 |================================================
LuaJIT 2.1-git
Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2133.37 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 2097.74 |================================================
LULESH 2.0.3
z/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9.3908987 |========================================
16 Cores ........... 10.9021150 |==============================================
LuxCoreRender 2.2
Scene: DLSC
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.51 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.30 |================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.2
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.07 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 2.40 |====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 41 |======================================================
16 Cores ........... 41 |======================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 131 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 130 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 543 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 543 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1503 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1493 |====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 107 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 109 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1656 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1650 |====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 121 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 120 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 500 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 498 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 547 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 539 |====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 633 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 628 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 216 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 215 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 739 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 736 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 266 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 267 |=====================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1245 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1244 |====================================================
LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 221.25 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 220.23 |==================================================
m-queens 1.2
Time To Solve
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 17.95 |=================
16 Cores ........... 55.08 |===================================================
MariaDB 10.3.8
Clients: 64
Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 207 |==========
16 Cores ........... 1080 |====================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 21587.38 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 21862.43 |================================================
MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12649.31 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 12748.61 |================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Add
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 45047.0 |==============================
16 Cores ........... 72837.7 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Get
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 77680.2 |===========================================
16 Cores ........... 89370.8 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Set
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 45117.5 |=============================
16 Cores ........... 75424.0 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Append
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 49940.5 |============================
16 Cores ........... 85868.9 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Delete
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 74147.4 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 88516.6 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Prepend
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 46495.9 |==========================
16 Cores ........... 88961.4 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.10
Method: Replace
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 47267.1 |===========================
16 Cores ........... 84273.8 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.22
Method: Add - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 48669.6 |=================================
16 Cores ........... 71799.0 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.22
Method: Get - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 78526.0 |============================================
16 Cores ........... 88109.7 |=================================================
Memcached mcperf 1.5.22
Method: Set - Connections: 64
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 48126.0 |=================================
16 Cores ........... 72538.5 |=================================================
Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17
Protocol: Redis
Ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2351667.58 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 2272891.42 |============================================
miniFE 2.2
Problem Size: Small
CG Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9322.75 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 10962.70 |================================================
Minion 1.8
Benchmark: Graceful
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 41.34 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 41.67 |===================================================
Minion 1.8
Benchmark: Solitaire
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 60.65 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 61.09 |===================================================
Minion 1.8
Benchmark: Quasigroup
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 107.53 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 108.52 |==================================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.41655 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 3.55042 |=================================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 17.33 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.57 |==================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6.82846 |===================================
16 Cores ........... 9.50372 |=================================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 968.72 |===================================
16 Cores ........... 1369.92 |=================================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.78688 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 3.22435 |=================================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.91239 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3.69166 |=====================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 137.79 |=======================================
16 Cores ........... 178.67 |==================================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1713.90 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1182.61 |==================================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 299.86 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 142.35 |========================
MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1
Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 56.58 |======================================
16 Cores ........... 76.35 |===================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_ica
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 49.20 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 36.05 |=====================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_qda
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 53.02 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 34.16 |=================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_svm
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11.50 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.43 |===================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1.47 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.42 |==================================================
Multichase Pointer Chaser
Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads
ns < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 74.56 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 73.27 |==================================================
N-Queens 1.0
Elapsed Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.496 |===============
16 Cores ........... 11.321 |==================================================
NAMD 2.13
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.62357 |=========================
16 Cores ........... 1.23901 |=================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 74815.99 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 54825.13 |===================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10815.59 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 10888.19 |================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2831.86 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1486.44 |==========================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2907.58 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1480.10 |=========================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 34599.49 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 31324.20 |===========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1464.45 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 1521.34 |=================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 65854.97 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 54335.46 |========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 30218.91 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 28788.06 |==============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 33710.70 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 24225.64 |==================================
NeatBench 5
Acceleration: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 37.6 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 30.7 |==========================================
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12.82 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 13.98 |===================================================
NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 36707.66 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 36762.59 |================================================
Node.js Express HTTP Load Test
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10908 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 11858 |===================================================
Node.js Octane Benchmark
Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 50125 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 51582 |===================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Relative Entropy
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12.42 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.59 |================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Windowed Gaussian
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6.111 |============================================
16 Cores ........... 7.013 |===================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Earthgecko Skyline
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 69.66 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 75.99 |===================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Bayesian Changepoint
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 24.90 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 24.67 |===================================================
Numpy Benchmark
Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 432.11 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 430.36 |==================================================
Ogg Encoding 1.3.3
WAV To Ogg
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5.225 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.253 |===================================================
OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 66.36 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 61.54 |===============================================
OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9307.4 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 4550.9 |========================
Optcarrot
Optimized Benchmark
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 103.98 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 102.75 |=================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Files
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11.45 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 13.88 |===================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Threads
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11.33 |=============
16 Cores ........... 46.12 |===================================================
OSBench
Test: Launch Programs
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 49.30 |===========
16 Cores ........... 228.58 |==================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Processes
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 27.96 |==========================
16 Cores ........... 54.98 |===================================================
OSBench
Test: Memory Allocations
Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 70.32 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 67.16 |=================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 50.00 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 18.52 |===================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.99 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 3.32 |===================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.67 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.37 |===================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 66.67 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 25.00 |===================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.69 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 1.75 |===================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 32.62 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 13.16 |=====================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13.58 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 4.97 |===================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 444.44 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 250.00 |============================
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 52.97 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 36.35 |===================================
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.993342 |======================
16 Cores ........... 2.122203 |================================================
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP Stencil
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5.282141 |=================================
16 Cores ........... 7.782015 |================================================
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 60.18 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 37.09 |===============================
Pennant 1.0.1
Test: sedovbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8885.04 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 4341.34 |========================
Pennant 1.0.1
Test: leblancbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8623.65 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 4088.41 |=======================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.11410246 |===========================================
16 Cores ........... 0.12256629 |==============================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.00136623 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 0.00091186 |===============================
PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 641756 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 641380 |==================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.40 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 7.69 |====================================================
PolyBench-C 4.2
Test: Covariance Computation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.141 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.120 |==================================================
PolyBench-C 4.2
Test: Correlation Computation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.120 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.114 |===================================================
PolyBench-C 4.2
Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.139 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.135 |===================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: ac
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5.91 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.89 |====================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 792360.46 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 272392.97 |================
PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0
Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11196.80 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 12881.18 |================================================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7812 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 6357 |==========================================
POV-Ray 3.7.0.7
Trace Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13.24 |=====================
16 Cores ........... 32.25 |===================================================
Primesieve 7.4
1e12 Prime Number Generation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6.123 |========================
16 Cores ........... 12.538 |==================================================
PyBench 2018-02-16
Total For Average Test Times
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 958 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 955 |=====================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 103.0 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 99.7 |=================================================
QMCPACK 3.8
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2581.7 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 1039.4 |====================
Qmlbench 2
Test: Canvas Text Simple
Frames > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 358.8 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 386.4 |===================================================
R Benchmark
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.2858 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 0.1361 |========================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: Serial
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 564.24 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 564.78 |==================================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 173.32 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 171.49 |=================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 41870.30 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 43057.69 |================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 42704.74 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 36372.44 |=========================================
RAR Compression 5.6.1
Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 68.09 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 59.84 |=============================================
RawTherapee
Total Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 40.81 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 42.41 |===================================================
rays1bench 2020-01-09
Large Scene
mrays/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 225.76 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 95.94 |=====================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2229021.42 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 2108260.53 |============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1674234.13 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 1723424.59 |==============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2175519.08 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 2097030.00 |============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1851271.35 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 1874999.40 |==============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1417209.04 |============================================
16 Cores ........... 1492623.12 |==============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2005988.50 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 2184449.11 |==============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1687462.13 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 1696335.08 |==============================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5168.07 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 5197.60 |=================================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3840.46 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3826.80 |=================================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4708.54 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 4278.41 |=============================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2677.51 |==========================================
16 Cores ........... 3157.26 |=================================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13551.88 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 15896.12 |================================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 16363.84 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 16238.53 |================================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5898.14 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 4006.60 |=================================
Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12746.61 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 8732.84 |=================================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.337 |=========================
16 Cores ........... 16.534 |==================================================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9.784 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 12.077 |==================================================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20.40 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 11.27 |============================
Rust Mandelbrot
Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 32.09 |=========================================
16 Cores ........... 40.17 |===================================================
Rust Prime Benchmark
Prime Number Test To 200,000,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.27 |==========================
16 Cores ........... 19.96 |===================================================
Schbench
Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8
usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3587 |====
16 Cores ........... 46315 |===================================================
Scikit-Learn 0.22.1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 7.973 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 7.875 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 718.03 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 697.80 |=================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 157.71 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 155.44 |=================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 356.71 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 328.58 |==============================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 793.80 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 782.85 |=================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 983.93 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 946.17 |================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1298.02 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1275.97 |================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.894 |====================
16 Cores ........... 7.407 |===================================================
Sockperf 3.4
Test: Throughput
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 534240 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 532089 |==================================================
Sockperf 3.4
Test: Latency Ping Pong
usec < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.931 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 2.210 |======================================
Sockperf 3.4
Test: Latency Under Load
usec < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13.23 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 10.78 |==========================================
SQLite 3.30.1
Threads / Copies: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 14.41 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 13.92 |=================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 58.59 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 58.17 |===================================================
Stockfish 9
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 95728787 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 36932742 |===================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 52075.8 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 49216.8 |==============================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 51667.1 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 49498.8 |===============================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 57321.8 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 54847.9 |===============================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 56819.2 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 54720.5 |===============================================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9207.85 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 4392.36 |=======================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Bsearch
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20222.03 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 7239.75 |=================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Forking
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 97017.28 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 10970.25 |=====
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Hsearch
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 253747.42 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 106584.80 |====================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Lsearch
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 434.81 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 138.27 |================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Tsearch
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1111.04 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 383.18 |=================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12151.31 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 5019.09 |====================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Semaphores
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3379188.34 |=======================================
16 Cores ........... 3998333.22 |==============================================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 234235.76 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 76991.04 |===============
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 88021.72 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 35109.17 |===================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8324.57 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3963.81 |=======================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Socket Activity
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 22217.76 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 10510.35 |=======================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Context Switching
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 21267958.31 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 2258922.93 |=====
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Glibc C String Functions
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3406391.46 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 1252570.26 |=================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 489.81 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 181.55 |===================
Stress-NG 0.07.26
Test: System V Message Passing
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 26168429.69 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 16301159.73 |============================
Sudokut 0.4
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12.90 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 12.23 |================================================
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 0.517 |============================
16 Cores ........... 0.954 |===================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 69.74 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 35.89 |==========================
SVT-HEVC 1.4.1
1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 174.75 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 82.13 |=======================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 368.41 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 172.13 |=======================
Swet 1.5.16
Average
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 811442548 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 815597466 |===============================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9119242.23 |==============================================
16 Cores ........... 8262426.98 |==========================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 68765.38 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 33077.17 |=======================
System Libxml2 Parsing
Filesize: 1 MB
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 424 |=====================================================
16 Cores ........... 424 |=====================================================
Systemd Total Boot Time
Test: Total
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 37055 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 39048 |===================================================
Systemd Total Boot Time
Test: Kernel
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 5710 |================================================
16 Cores ........... 6170 |====================================================
Systemd Total Boot Time
Test: Loader
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 9976 |====================================================
16 Cores ........... 3542 |==================
Systemd Total Boot Time
Test: Firmware
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20002 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 20153 |===================================================
Systemd Total Boot Time
Test: Userspace
ms < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 31345 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 32878 |===================================================
t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 25.60 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 16.06 |================================
t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.743 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 5.449 |================================
Tachyon 0.99b6
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 25.04 |======================
16 Cores ........... 58.32 |===================================================
Tensorflow
Build: Cifar10
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 42.02 |===============================================
16 Cores ........... 45.44 |===================================================
Tesseract OCR 4.1.0
Time To OCR 7 Images
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 24.08 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 23.82 |==================================================
Threaded I/O Tester 20170503
Test: Write - Size Per Thread: 32MB - Thread Count: 4
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 10.55 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 10.41 |==================================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 18.58 |==================================
16 Cores ........... 27.54 |===================================================
Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 21.97 |=============================
16 Cores ........... 38.02 |===================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 8.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 589.11 |==============================
16 Cores ........... 979.62 |==================================================
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 83.12 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 82.19 |==================================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.842 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 3.678 |=======================================
Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 13.43 |===============================
16 Cores ........... 22.30 |===================================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 24.54 |=========================
16 Cores ........... 49.36 |===================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 122.77 |==========================
16 Cores ........... 232.33 |==================================================
Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 11.58 |========================
16 Cores ........... 25.09 |===================================================
Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7
Primate Phylogeny Analysis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 75.41 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 69.52 |===============================================
Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 32.04 |==================================
16 Cores ........... 48.21 |===================================================
Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memcpy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 12225.4 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 12317.7 |=================================================
Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memset
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 20042.4 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 20120.6 |=================================================
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 1336877 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 1319372 |================================================
TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 667.34 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 617.85 |==============================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Hair
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.18217 |====================
16 Cores ........... 19.25580 |================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Water Caustic
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 18.68 |=======================================
16 Cores ........... 24.13 |===================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Non-Exponential
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 2.64289 |===============
16 Cores ........... 8.92215 |=================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Volumetric Caustic
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 3.56382 |====================
16 Cores ........... 8.56420 |=================================================
Unpacking The Linux Kernel
linux-4.15.tar.xz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 4.984 |===================================================
16 Cores ........... 4.964 |===================================================
VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2
Speed: Speed 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 24.48 |============================================
16 Cores ........... 28.62 |===================================================
x264 2019-12-17
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 205.31 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 131.88 |================================
x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 64.90 |=============================================
16 Cores ........... 73.21 |===================================================
Xsbench 2017-07-06
Lookups/s > Higher Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 6079554 |=================================================
16 Cores ........... 3840404 |===============================
XZ Compression 5.2.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 18.65 |========================================
16 Cores ........... 23.63 |===================================================
Zstd Compression
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 170.78 |==================================================
16 Cores ........... 163.05 |================================================
Zstd Compression 1.3.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Threadripper 3970X . 8.544 |===============================
16 Cores ........... 13.565 |==================================================