Xeon E5 Leap Day Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 testing with a MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB on Ubuntu 19.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.50GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 80GB INTEL SSDSCKGW08, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190806, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4 IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1335980 |============================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 652365 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1257037 |============================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 918812 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1138260 |============================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 837303 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 924452 |============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 586237 |============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1182.26 |============================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 465.45 |============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 267.43 |============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 3504.38 |============================================= NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1.93321 |============================================= Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 23.85 |=============================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 126196 |============================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 126381 |============================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 126259 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 33 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 98 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 388 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1128 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 64 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1177 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 77 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 427 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 355 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 507 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 145 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 591 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 181 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 981 |================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 14326.75 |============================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 32.47 |=============================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 26229.22 |============================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 73.74 |=============================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 12267.93 |============================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 55.33 |=============================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 6253.72 |============================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 41.66 |=============================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 12464.65 |============================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 42.33 |=============================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 26455.49 |============================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 42.13 |=============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 8525.63 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 5789.10 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter Finagle ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 7714.68 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 6452.47 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 5149.56 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 24919.80 |============================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 24265.61 |============================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 5676.47 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 7190.37 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 13506.54 |============================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 4722.75 |============================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 75.48 |=============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 3082.47 |============================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 288.48 |============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 348.47 |============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 109.77 |============================================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 74.72 |=============================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 122.29 |============================================== KeyDB 5.3.1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 453869.79 |=========================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 8853898.36 |========================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 4007.19 |============================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 354.52 |============================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 3340.05 |============================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 2804.78 |============================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 188.26 |============================================== GROMACS 2020 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 0.854 |=============================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1041.45 |============================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 24.88 |=============================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 14.10 |=============================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 137.94 |============================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 53.53 |=============================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 65.03 |=============================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 58.86 |=============================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 15.37 |=============================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 3.37 |================================================