xeon-e5-clear-linux Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 testing with a MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 on Clear Linux OS 31290 via the Phoronix Test Suite. CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Clear Linux OS 31290, Kernel: 5.3.5-847.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191011 gcc-9-branch@276857 + Clang 9.0.0 + LLVM 9.0.0, File-System: ext4 Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Clear Linux OS 31290, Kernel: 5.3.5-847.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191011 gcc-9-branch@276857 + Clang 9.0.0 + LLVM 9.0.0, File-System: ext4 IOR 3.2.1 Write Test MB/s > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 105.08 |============================ IOR 3.2.1 Read Test MB/s > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 346.40 |============================ Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 202.61 |============================ libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 26.50 |============================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 10.55 |============================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 41.36 |============================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 10.28 |============================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 565947 |============================ MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 9.41 |============================== MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 23.52 |============================= MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 40.49 |============================= MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6583.84 |=========================== MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 15.66 |============================= MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 14.33 |============================= MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 886.75 |============================ MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5594.66 |=========================== MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 486.14 |============================ MKL-DNN DNNL 1.1 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 367.38 |============================ dav1d 0.5.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 225.82 |============================ dav1d 0.5.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 60.41 |============================= dav1d 0.5.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 208.62 |============================ dav1d 0.5.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better CORSAIR FORCE LX - Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 33.96 |============================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.68 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.85 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.47 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5.91 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.47 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5.02 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.26 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 63.43 |================================================ Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.31 |================================================= Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.65 |================================================= Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.10 |================================================= Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.79 |================================================= Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.80 |================================================= Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.34 |================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 70.41 |================================================ SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 72.19 |================================================ SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 56.71 |================================================ Intel Open Image Denoise 1.0.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.27 |================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.2 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.61 |================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.2 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.62 |================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 88.29 |================================================ Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 68.10 |================================================ Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 25.04 |================================================ Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 31.70 |================================================ N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 52.27 |================================================ Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 27.96 |================================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 967.30 |=============================================== Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 57.69 |================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 17251 |================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 14313 |================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 14283 |================================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 539163 |=============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 20066598 |============================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 658532 |=============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 578056 |=============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 751829 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 698307 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 675690 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 644566 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 829185 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 805811 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 815446 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 833600 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 818894 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 838349 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 559190 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 545095 |=============================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 543246 |=============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 626.16 |=============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 232.83 |=============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 124.47 |=============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2029.99 |============================================== NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.99444 |============================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 49.80 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 17 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 48 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 196 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 428 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 40 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 451 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 53 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 212 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 190 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 263 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 77 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 309 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 89 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 481 |================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 13891.62 |============================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 36.91 |================================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 24953.71 |============================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 82.07 |================================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 11063.39 |============================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 61.48 |================================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5625.48 |============================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 47.03 |================================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 12855.57 |============================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 47.16 |================================================ SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 28582.75 |============================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 47.26 |================================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 12638.70 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 8314.42 |============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter Finagle ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 7310.55 |============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 9744.85 |============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 12097.40 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 39674.99 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 51515.51 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6195.56 |============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 8031.85 |============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 15582.37 |============================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3362.89 |============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 37.56 |================================================ Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1536.51 |============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 145.33 |=============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 174.15 |=============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 55.35 |================================================ KeyDB 5.3.1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 230234.38 |============================================ Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1570980.71 |=========================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5289.44 |============================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 400.18 |=============================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3739.08 |============================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3400.34 |============================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 247.34 |===============================================