Cascade Lake Xeon 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 testing with a GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS) and llvmpipe 377GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe 377GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.6.0-050600rc3-generic (x86_64) 20200223, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.0 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20200220, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 3123999 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 852993 |======================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2618291 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 869941 |======================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2402904 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 871807 |======================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1589260 |======================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 748080 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1499.19 |======================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 591.66 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 300.90 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 4638.85 |======================================= NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 0.36518 |======================================= Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 32.11 |========================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: TBB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 23855 |========================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 25056 |========================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 24085 |========================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 24182 |========================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 38 |============================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 102 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 445 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1158 |========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 73 |============================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1115 |========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 97 |============================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 425 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 410 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 541 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 174 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 616 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 198 |=========================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1061 |========================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 21398.45 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 22.68 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 46095.34 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 48.49 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 17231.93 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 38.14 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 8472.64 |======================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 29.73 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 19819.22 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 29.64 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 58716.95 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 29.84 |========================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6888.15 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6144.35 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter Finagle ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 49730.60 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6881.35 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 3480.86 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 26166.06 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 23205.14 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 8890.46 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 16259.21 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 22936.17 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6651.98 |======================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 89.98 |========================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 3836.52 |======================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 346.81 |======================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 432.53 |======================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 136.84 |======================================== KeyDB 5.3.1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 458230.97 |===================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 31932760.22 |=================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 4016.45 |======================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 360.16 |======================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2687.87 |======================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2683.92 |======================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 188.31 |======================================== GROMACS 2020 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 5.730 |========================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 925.49 |======================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 14.44 |========================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 7.619 |========================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 86.08 |========================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 32.62 |=========================================