Xeon HP zBook
Intel Xeon E-2286M testing with a HP 860C (R92 Ver. 01.03.04 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 16GB on CentOS Linux 8 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E-2286M: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E-2286M @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: HP 860C (R92 Ver. 01.03.04 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1024GB Western Digital PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00-1006, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 16GB (600/6000MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC285, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200

	OS: CentOS Linux 8, Kernel: 4.18.0-177.el8.x86_64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 435.21, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 8.3.1 20190507, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


NAMD 2.13
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 3.14447 |=================================================


Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29

Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 24.73 |===================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 45 |======================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 121 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 528 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 1540 |====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 104 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 1743 |====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 136 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 550 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 496 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 705 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 198 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 805 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 238 |=====================================================


lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 1298 |====================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: wyhash
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 27443.41 |================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: wyhash
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 16.08 |===================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: MeowHash
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 60278.06 |================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: MeowHash
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 35.33 |===================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: Spooky32
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 22251.29 |================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: Spooky32
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 27.71 |===================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: fasthash32
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 11454.72 |================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: fasthash32
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 21.49 |===================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha2_atonce
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 25016.38 |================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha2_atonce
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 21.82 |===================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 67820.48 |================================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 21.66 |===================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 7818.60 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 4347.45 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Twitter Finagle
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 6931.53 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 5023.55 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 9442.82 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 15659.05 |================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 26790.08 |================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Twitter HTTP Requests
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 4988.49 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 5211.02 |=================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 11493.08 |================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures
ms < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 1911.67 |=================================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: KASUMI
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 106.42 |==================================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: AES-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 4487.85 |=================================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: Twofish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 406.45 |==================================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: Blowfish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 502.69 |==================================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: CAST-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E-2286M . 164.70 |==================================================