results-cpu-tesseract, "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Crypto", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1310.82,1066.3,1068.06,1069,1067.04,1066.6,1064.8,1065.27,1064.72,1065.32,1064.52,1064.71,1064.7,1064.02 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Forking", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",44035.72,41927.38,41907.07 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: CPU Stress", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2371.12,2278.26,2275.48 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Semaphores", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3577176.93,3334725.51,3311403.9,3343253.77,3330423.02,3411789.33 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Memory Copying", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1924.49,1925.77,1921.28 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Socket Activity", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3265.6,3281.86,3258.29 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: Context Switching", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1758154.87,1762457.03,1696630.01 "Stress-NG 0.07.26 - Test: System V Message Passing", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5055955.82,4847075.38,4839705.84 "Sysbench 2018-07-28 - Test: Memory", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",20926987.9508,21285080.9317,21439497.928 "Sysbench 2018-07-28 - Test: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",13801.6585,13805.6887,13169.1586 "BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1435545,1410940,1419200 "BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",25264,28638,29739 "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",268.456,266.745,264.18 "SVT-AV1 0.5 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",19.699,17.464,17.632,17.553,17.68,17.584,17.702,17.587,17.627,17.701,17.637,17.624 "SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",112.87,119.4,108.75,107.66,107.72,107.82,107.99,108.23,107.95,108.77,107.58,108.32,108.13,107.99,108.66 "SVT-VP9 2019-02-17 - 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",30.44,29.01,29.05 "VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",120.08,112.86,111.47,112.46,113.39,111.2 "x264 2018-09-25 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",56.46,52.09,52.28,51.99,52.52,52.27,51.94,52.1 "x265 3.0 - H.265 1080p Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",26.83,25.81,25.66 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ptrans", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3.47249,3.46844,3.52637 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.96139,1.96229,1.96205 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.40652,1.41049,1.399 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ffte", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6.11722,6.13069,5.79404 "High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.48777,1.47394,1.45911 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-HPL", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",128.792,129.41,129.394 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ffte", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6.11722,6.13069,5.79404 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: EP-DGEMM", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",15.2446,15.5713,15.4239 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Random Access", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",0.00705789,0.00704379,0.00706628 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: Rotate", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",247,246,246 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: Sharpen", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",99,95,95 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: Enhanced", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",133,130,130 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 - Operation: Resizing", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",236,234,234 "Cryptsetup 2.0.2 - PBKDF2-sha512", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1683107,1713359,1691251 "Cryptsetup - PBKDF2-whirlpool", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",994853,1016062,996745 "Xsbench 2017-07-06 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1704408,1702025,1702483 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Compile", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2083.89,2107.02,2115.7 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Initial Create", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",540.3,546.44,539.79 "Compile Bench 0.6 - Test: Read Compiled Tree", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2180.84,2856.11,2884.61 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",30500.6,30504.2,30583.3,30505.7,30516.9 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",21117,21112.3,21112,21108.5,21101.6 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",23522.7,23520.8,23518.3,23520.7,23527.6 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",23561.1,23558.7,23558.3,23551.6,23554.8 "Tinymembench 2018-05-28 - Standard Memcpy", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",17041.8,17269.6,16888.2 "Tinymembench 2018-05-28 - Standard Memset", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",35087.5,35667.6,33444.2 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",12201.632,14607.444,11975.045 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",411,415,413 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "CacheBench - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3769.5171258571,3768.2190299048,3769.8721121905 "CacheBench - Test: Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",31623.86937581,31567.55606181,31622.073293048 "CacheBench - Test: Read / Modify / Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",33113.87879,32900.800180857,32894.199777524 "libjpeg-turbo tjbench 1.5.3 - Test: Decompression Throughput", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",183.655002,185.094482,183.91885 "Sockperf 3.4 - Test: Throughput", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",528368,526810,524069,527230,512648 "FFTW 3.3.6 - Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",8676.1,8608.4,8723 "FFTW 3.3.6 - Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6483.5,6478.7,6498.7 "FFTW 3.3.6 - Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",46638,47590,47145 "FFTW 3.3.6 - Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",24260,25091,25245 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2422.354355901,2454.782411763,2413.8934609681,2448.673449811 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1099.8635921811,1100.1452991131,1098.7381386591,1100.4271503887 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1562.939729727,1663.5579765994,1606.1146442705,1618.7848381967 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1703.3399249996,1712.7998112217,1711.6813783972,1710.0065316675 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6008.0676089359,6061.4134915505,5916.9376631836,6076.5878051407 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1737.5609236612,1735.9954803301,1735.9954803301,1737.5609236612 "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2973.288784,3003.545273,3009.714939 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",14559.849,14504.923,14675.701 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",14205.815,14216.309,14196.674 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",13919.501,13675.518,14087.925 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",14655.544,14587.467,14684.117 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",9738.232,9759.318,9748.214 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",9772.019,9777.677,9777.169 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",9719.51,9745.535,9756.894 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",9582.538,9582.16,9581.315 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: KASUMI - Encrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",99.002,99.052,98.772 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: KASUMI - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",95.742,95.693,95.761 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: AES-256 - Encrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",4212.789,4222.373,4232.222 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: AES-256 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",4220.961,4241.472,4239.086 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: Twofish - Encrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",387.778,391.065,390.664 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: Twofish - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",382.238,388.109,388.117 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: Blowfish - Encrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",307.234,307.403,306.6 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: Blowfish - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",307.572,307.965,307.77 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",150.245,150.399,150.532 "Botan 2.8.0 - Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",150.279,150.295,150.627 "7-Zip Compression 16.02 - Compress Speed Test", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",30924,30122,30282 "Crafty 25.2 - Elapsed Time", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",8558514,8593118,8597092 "Stockfish 9 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",12343427,12424259,12186145 "asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",14992255,14371571,13982290,14164857,15080042,14722182,14297773 "Swet 1.5.16 - Average", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",785990443,786425144,784229551 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Add", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",72732.4,71455.5,72085.3 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Get", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",128243.8,129899.7,128401.4 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Set", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",72699.3,71450.9,72569.1 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Append", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",75957,77019,76283.2 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Delete", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",128275.4,129062.7,128961.6 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Prepend", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",77478.3,77278.4,77058.3 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Replace", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",76728,77402,77151.6 "MariaDB 10.3.8 - Clients: 1", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",466.41791044776,465.33271288972,471.25353440151 "MariaDB 10.3.8 - Clients: 16", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",392.31071008239,392.77297721917,394.0110323089 "MariaDB 10.3.8 - Clients: 64", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",345.06556245687,346.9812630118,347.70514603616 "MariaDB 10.3.8 - Clients: 256", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",195.65642731364,185.56318426424,196.92792437968,181.45527127563,169.17611233294,192.34468166955 "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: FLOAT", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",453614021.90474,453811044.49429,456570910.54467 "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: DOUBLE", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1016115386.237,1015060399.5402,1013365211.351 "ebizzy 0.3 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",273797,283455,262174,260471,272477,285450,270064,282865,275888,284630,260893,247910,258835,251073,261260 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: LPOP", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3367003.5,3086419.75,2994012,3184713.25,2890173.5,3367003.5,3367003.5,3105590,3278688.5,3154574,3367003.5,3333333.25,3311258.5,2808988.75,3205128.25 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2659574.5,2012072.38,2645502.75,2645502.75,2617801,2564102.75,2645502.75,2597402.75,2638522.25,2597402.75,2544529.25,2493765.75 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2105263.25,2044989.75,1754386,1811594.25,2114165,1980198,1976284.62,2049180.25,2028397.62,2066115.75,2114165,2012072.38,1890359.25,2049180.25,2004008 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3164556.75,2890173.5,3115264.75,2762431,2777777.75,2881844.25,3030303,2785515.25,3215434.25,2958580,3067484.5,2906976.75,3184713.25,3225806.5,3184713.25 "Redis 4.0.8 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",2202643.25,2173913,1960784.38,2192982.5,2178649.25,2217295,2164502,2247191,2145922.75,2188183.75,2105263.25,2036659.88,2123142.25,1988071.5,2262443.5 "NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",36494.45,35575.01,35703.71 "Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",25950.96,24760.89,24706.81 "PHPBench 0.8.1 - PHP Benchmark Suite", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",685102,685782,688349 "OpenSSL 1.1.1 - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1599.5,1429.5,1428.2,1437,1428.9,1431.3,1418.4,1430.6,1428.9,1435.9,1431.9,1425.9,1430.3 "CLOMP 3.3 - Static OMP Speedup", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3.52,3.53,3.51,3.53,3.5 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: BT.A", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5411.34,5318.31,4953.85,4976.4,4977.41,4953.25,4924.1,4924.76,4937.69,4960.69,4981.51,4960.83,4950.11,4961.66,4968.54 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",274.98,265.07,265.09 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: FT.A", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",8653.27,8720.93,8661.72 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: FT.B", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",9652.01,9701.91,8989.88,9001.71,8980.47,9009.25,8962.43,8970.92,8968.65,8904.15,9003.43,9016.34 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",19256.13,19295.2,19195.24 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: LU.C", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",10357.38,10382.36,10350.13 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: SP.A", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3735.34,3603.32,3643.15 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",109680.392756,109178.501214,110484.778984 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",10998.694216,10938.992195,10945.50774 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",107942.505807,108279.244787,108066.259296 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",12741.353009,12661.960941,12710.807163 "Apache Siege 2.4.29 - Concurrent Users: 200", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",46893.32,42471.86,42671.2,42589.44,42598.51,42507.97,42408.82,42616.66,42544.14,42927.67,42964.55,43001.51,43066.32 "Apache Siege 2.4.29 - Concurrent Users: 250", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",43607.18,42286.88,42301.18 "BRL-CAD 7.28.0 - VGR Performance Metric", Higher Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "ctx_clock - Context Switch Time", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",808,810,810 "BLAKE2 20170307 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3.32,3.31,3.32 "NAMD 2.13b1 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3.54671,3.54581,3.55021,3.54838,3.55473 "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 - Test: Rhodopsin Protein", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",27.1976,27.3406,27.2152 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Scala Dotty", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6698.338,6712.191,6567.939,6398.214,6425.953,6380.65,5871.302,6412.5,6199.172,6501.851,6524.833,6667.712,6568.292,6831.585,6471.185,6608.771,6567.206,6288.013,6201.163,6658.568,6399.255,6865.254,6714.713,6323.949,6645.013,6601.505,6399.184,6310.038,6782.497,6059.492,6586.032,5933.825,6378.601,6588.475,6529.358,6509.269,6918.859,6391.837,6899.232,6594.977 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Twitter Finagle", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5753.177,6209.847,6338.411,6356.778,6432.994,6209.995,6264.684,6444.668,6152.365,6682.741,6359.678,6495.442,7097.871,6774.614,6374.152,6267.831,6356.21,6518.783,6383.446,6334.333,6463.065,6586.097,6429.587,7266.329,6795.933,6529.351,6349.522,6547.272,6269.766,7022.952,6757.37,6827.697,6607.441,6371.728,6347.553,6392.956,6441.678,6847.466,6678.623,6409.037 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Apache Spark ALS", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5574.772,6319.68,6204.036,5827.781,7008.028,6647.597,6034.958,6036.103,6880.356,6036.476,6299.868,5663.551,5989.487,7171.612,6133.209,6364.656,6228.231,5744.146,6256.302,6364.229,5805.63,6552.42,5999.352,6157.881,6496.782,6297.955,6581.778,6874.482,5691.04,6068.034,6082.212,6003.32,6408.318,6390.129,5981.958,6133.06,6925.336,6383.623,5486.873,5647.7 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Apache Spark Bayes", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6157.924,6579.445,6282.036,6351.664,6598.536,6384.98,6490.35,8022.449,6274.896,6740.501,6634.64,5485.038,6184.102,6534.232,6846.817,6544.431,5982.235,6078.708,6134.852,6238.886,6573.928,6507.794,6480.678,6585.139,5748.553,5540.275,6317.962,6516.809,6068.511,6526.921,6706.686,6011.609,6194.806,6432.556,6352.681,6102.73,6263.629,6029.17,5731.635,5974.299 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Savina Reactors.IO", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",20798.273,21832.311,21740.235,21889.63,21544.924,21748.392,22088.326,21879.601 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Apache Spark PageRank", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",21535.156,22757.47,22988.666,22563.723,22484.365,22140.486,22324.749,22841.414 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: In-Memory Database Shootout", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5365.824,5368.613,6181.511,5790.239,6333.484,6060.467,6007.34,5634.756,6331.442,5856.676,6110.774,6133.818,5587.455,6147.536,5953.24,6068.2,5682.292,5988.433,5923.022,5784.134,5935.504,5908.342,6231.812,6074.173,5734.433,5832.89,6266.09,5921.571,6118.037,5952.743,5738.007,6245.222,5879.815,5716.267,5945.366,6081.461,6294.153,5885.367,5653.299,5794.553 "Renaissance 0.9.0 - Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",11260.221,11732.479,12317.45,11601.821,11761.405,12654.476,13179.512,11655.352,11812.433,11437.498,11990.956,11506.667,11505.951,11973.633,12208.819,12350.244,11476.998,12350.255,12573.409,12745.194,11121.643,12631.329,12069.41,12612.779,12213.071,12527.007,11791.778,12241.357,12247.18,12314.47,11857.644,12041.082,13300.492,11446.251,12805.944,12055.896,11984.665,11879.67,11778.111,12114.698 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",11.7752,12.94,13.8439,12.8954,13.3323,12.4366,13.044,13.2774,13.1022,13.1287,13.0008,13.3712 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",11.424,11.9365,11.891 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",11.4557,11.4391,11.4702 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",644.757,737.536,746.088,743.696,741.945,745.614,742.13,743.73,778.413,733.349,742.36,741.326,742.305,741.297 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",310.394,316.93,316.649 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: H2", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3053,3082,2935,2923 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: Jython", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3885,3784,3811,3860 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: Tradesoap", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5127,5801,6046 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: Tradebeans", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3562,3457,3345,3625,3231,3252,3329,3539,3211,3291,3497,3273,3986,3524,3264,3197 "Numpy Benchmark - ", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: cos", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",33408.6,33367.8,33061.8 "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: ffs", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.78533,1.78025,1.79504 "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: sin", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",33316.8,33381.2,33096.2 "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: sqrt", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.78315,1.77999,1.78632,1.78575,1.78067,1.78251,1.78589,1.78041,1.78122,1.78045,1.78263,1.78031,1.78046,1.7789,1.78098 "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: tanh", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",12.1197,13.1608,12.1034,12.109,12.1292,12.1081,13.1592,12.1141,12.1095,12.0867,12.1022,12.1045,12.1244,12.1457,12.1074 "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: ffsll", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.77803,1.78218,1.78464 "glibc bench 1.0 - Benchmark: pthread_once", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1.77666,1.78018,1.77976,1.78229 "Go Benchmarks - Test: http", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6552,6616,6627 "Go Benchmarks - Test: json", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",10089808,11423386,11428625,11443140,11450908,11469375,11447466,11454936,11373638,11453738,11428487,11421102 "Go Benchmarks - Test: build", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",13593814199,13087073619,13139878763 "Go Benchmarks - Test: garbage", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",1873565,2066882,2282144,2260862,2266264,2279055,2256486,2270194,2273390,2272992,2267235,2269663,2268597,2270979,2270466 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5.095,5.099,5.097 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",53.181,53.09,53.496 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",52.097,52.195,52.193 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",54.578,54.595,54.439 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",58.736,58.724,58.71 "t-test1 2017-01-13 - Threads: 1", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",19.231,19.154,19.199 "t-test1 2017-01-13 - Threads: 2", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6.373,6.344,6.4 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP LBM", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",124.304855,124.372421,124.486977 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP CUTCP", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5.481403,5.47192,5.478781 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP Stencil", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",17.267502,17.283655,17.287745 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",42.492542,45.985512,43.994041,44.031651,45.9408,48.924412,48.769726,46.155102,48.183796,48.922382,44.460812,44.394131,49.317436,48.163303,44.464245 "CloverLeaf - Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",4.7724170684814,4.7747719287872,4.7700290679932 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenMP LavaMD", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",170.546,171.491,171.902 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenMP CFD Solver", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",33.028,36.152,37.728,36.478,36.66,37.019,38.096,36.524,36.645,37.008,36.788,36.656,36.403 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenMP Streamcluster", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",23.7,24.18,24.203 "Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 - Pfam Database Search", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5.843,5.729,5.944 "Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 - Multiple Sequence Alignment", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3.164,2.826,3.12,2.827,2.819,3.12,3.408,3.453,3.366,3.121,3.096,3.525,3.177,2.752,2.829 "Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 - Primate Phylogeny Analysis", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",215.851,217.983,217.511 "Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",89.968,90.578,90.556 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",141.092,140.467,140.228 "Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "Timed PHP Compilation 7.1.9 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",73.951,76.078,76.081 "C-Ray 1.1 - Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",161.085,161.726,162.351 "Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 - 256MB File Compression", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6.007,5.852,6.56,6.542,6.59,6.49,6.502,6.554,6.588,6.581,6.49,6.587,6.564,6.559,6.534 "POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 - Trace Time", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",101.5,102.611,102.659 "Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",50.437,52.78,52.156 "Rust Mandelbrot - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",55.995,56.598,56.607 "Rust Prime Benchmark - Prime Number Test To 200,000,000", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",22.474,23.813,23.789,23.896 "XZ Compression 5.2.4 - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",41.616,41.999,41.813 "Zstd Compression 1.3.4 - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",28.342,27.515,27.507 "Cython benchmark 0.27 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",40.963,38.755,38.975,39.141 "FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 - WAV To FLAC", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",8.505,8.332,8.328,8.331,8.327 "LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 - WAV To MP3", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",27.058,27.002,26.986 "Hackbench - Count: 32 - Type: Process", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",201.431,208.321,206.856 "m-queens 1.2 - Time To Solve", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",172.889,174.47,174.468 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Graceful", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",48.943711,48.573736,48.304357 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Solitaire", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",62.176233,63.445522,63.034999 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Quasigroup", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",112.212274,113.897697,112.893246 "Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: Serial", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "Radiance Benchmark 5.0 - Test: SMP Parallel", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB", "R Benchmark - ", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",0.18137948048978,0.18078554156025,0.18316026622154,0.18186432813919,0.18139113042646,0.18229476345737,0.1808538216532,0.18200775676001,0.18240793715413,0.18031684350394,0.18065648541075,0.18391578748497,0.18083563747277,0.17994456099308,0.1822724046164 "Tachyon 0.98.9 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",6.8792,7.8788,8.275,8.2897,8.2839,8.3053,8.3087,8.3577,8.2626,8.3346,8.2829,8.2854,8.3083,8.3386,8.2734 "Tensorflow 2017-02-03 - Build: Cifar10", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",35.89,40.8,40.77,40.73,40.7,40.7,40.66,40.79,40.85,40.8,40.72,40.93 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Atol", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",60.81,60.853,60.884 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Ctype", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",28.726,28.715,28.7 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Math Library", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",336.195,336.642,335.205 "CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 - Test: Function Objects", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",14.126,14.12,14.134 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",14.603,15.64,15.753,15.725,15.735,15.769 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",7.571,7.575,7.769 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",0.21,0.211,0.208,0.213,0.215 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",5.236,5.207,5.2 "GNU Octave Benchmark 4.2.2 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",8.181,8.052,8.042 "Scikit-Learn 0.17.1 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",13.53,13.46,13.434 "Tesseract OCR 4.0.0-beta.1 - Time To OCR 7 Images", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",25.43,25.4,25.37 "Sockperf 3.4 - Test: Latency Ping Pong", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",3.39,3.442,3.368,3.462,3.437 "Sockperf 3.4 - Test: Latency Under Load", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",17.136,17.111,17.285,17.371,9.141,27.229,16.639,19.267,16.394,17.248,17.167,17.893,20.213,17.374,18.185,18.977,26.735,8.303,19.67,19.132,27.551,19.473,15.562,17.489,20.15 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Random Ring Latency", Lower Results Are Better "Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB",0.826333,0.842812,0.846629