midgar

cpu upgrade

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2002213-HV-MIDGAR14559
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

C/C++ Compiler Tests 6 Tests
Compression Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 10 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Cryptography 4 Tests
Encoding 2 Tests
Multi-Core 5 Tests
Server 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 7 Tests
Single-Threaded 5 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1
February 03 2020
  1 Hour, 31 Minutes
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #2
February 04 2020
  4 Minutes
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2
February 21 2020
  1 Hour, 15 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  57 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

midgar cpu upgrade Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 @ 2.50GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #2: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 @ 2.50GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3 + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 @ 2.10GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3 + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 26.29 |============================================= x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 15.30 |============================================ Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #2 . 14.93 |=========================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 15.50 |============================================= OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 513 |============================== Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #2 . 514 |============================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 795 |=============================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 12728 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 10275 |==================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 12.04 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 9.80 |===================================== LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 456 |========================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 505 |=============================================== Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 35.05 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 23.91 |=============================== System BZIP2 Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 19.24 |======================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 22.45 |============================================= Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 14508 |================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 20424 |============================================= Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 17719201 |========================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 12653740 |============================== Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 49439676531 |================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 58463393315 |======================================= Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 3395486 |=========================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 2393405 |============================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: KASUMI - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 43.36 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 40.66 |========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 41.12 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 38.61 |========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: AES-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 1294 |============================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 1075 |====================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 1284 |============================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 1117 |======================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Twofish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 148 |=============================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 139 |============================================ Botan 2.8.0 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 144 |=============================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 141 |============================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Blowfish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 111 |=============================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 111 |=============================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 112 |=============================================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 112 |=============================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 58.43 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 56.50 |============================================ Botan 2.8.0 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 59.40 |============================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 56.75 |=========================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 4329 |=============================== Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 6369 |============================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 161248 |============================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 251104 |============================================ Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 795163 |============================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 691574 |====================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 579537 |============================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 504341 |====================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 442271 |============================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 403071 |======================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 753272 |============================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 645281 |====================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 560657 |============================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 485315 |====================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 11976025 |========================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 12317508 |========================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 6220 |================================ Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 8908 |============================================== GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 #1 . 3.37 |======================================= Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 ... 3.96 |============================================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2650L v2 . 34.71 |===============================================