Ryzen 5 2600 Linux Perf AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core testing with a Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F23 BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Ryzen 5 2600: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F23 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA-RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Cape Verde/Pitcairn, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-27-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.8 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 29.56 |========================================================= PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6250 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0852 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0748 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0790 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0930 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 12 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.1143 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0371 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0368 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0382 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0435 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0431 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 12 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0467 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0450 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0507 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0785 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 12 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.1027 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.1074 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0935 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.0962 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.1030 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 12 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.1155 |======================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.16856 |======================================================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 3.37215 |======================================================= Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 135.05 |======================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.143 |========================================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1034145 |======================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11994 |========================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 394521 |======================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 279 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 601 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 82 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 117 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 630 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 153 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 817 |=========================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.002 |========================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.50 |========================================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.74 |========================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 55.93 |========================================================= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.806681 |====================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.0.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.51 |========================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.2 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 68754.07 |====================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.2 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 3918.72 |======================================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4244.64 |======================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 28.56 |========================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 84.01 |========================================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 150.36 |======================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 130.60 |======================================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 58.70 |========================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 78.09 |========================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 170.79 |======================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 18.54 |========================================================= rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 25.95 |========================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 279.80 |======================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 79.41 |========================================================= N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 21.38 |========================================================= Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.05 |========================================================= Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 156.66 |======================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1138.9 |======================================================== GROMACS 2019.4 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.491 |========================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 80.63 |========================================================= Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.82 |========================================================= Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.787 |========================================================= Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.217 |========================================================= Darktable 2.4.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.556 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.787 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.165 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 123.41 |======================================================== GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 35.60 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 48.18 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 37.35 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 73.16 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 68.36 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 48.89 |========================================================= Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 30.34 |========================================================= LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.00 |========================================================= RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 66.79 |========================================================= librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 26.09 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2241251.25 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1754590.63 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1211968.75 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2143163.08 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1554192.19 |==================================================== Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 77.16 |========================================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8543 |========================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 287.32 |======================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 797.44 |======================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 432.47 |======================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1046.28 |======================================================= NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.72 |========================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 606.27 |======================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 369.17 |======================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 334.11 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 967.1 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11693 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 67.6 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.2 |=========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1750 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 33.6 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 464.4 |========================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.72 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.87 |=========================================================