2020-02-14-0735 4 x AMD Opteron 8222 testing with a HP ProLiant DL585 G2 (A07 BIOS) and AMD ES1000 128MB on CentOS 6.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. ProLiant DL585 G2: Processor: 4 x AMD Opteron 8222 @ 3.01GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL585 G2 (A07 BIOS), Chipset: AMD K8, Memory: 64512MB, Disk: 50GB, Graphics: AMD ES1000 128MB, Network: Broadcom Limited NetXtreme II BCM5706 Gigabit OS: CentOS 6.10, Kernel: 2.6.32-754.23.1.el6.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.4.7 20120313, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 ProLiant DL385 Gen10: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7262 8-Core (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10 (A40 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 32 x 64 GB DDR4-2666MHz HPE P03053-1A1, Disk: 6001GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eH3, Network: 2 x Intel 10G X550T + 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: RedHatEnterpriseWorkstation 7.5, Kernel: 3.10.0-862.14.4.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 222.48 |================================================ ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 46.32 |========== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 128 Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 113.11 |================================================ Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 8692.55 |======================= ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 17643.59 |============================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 35794992 |============================================== GIMP 2.8.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 73.16 |================================================= AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 85.58 |================================================= ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 60.02 |================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 5115.77 |======= ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 34524.60 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 4917.79 |====== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 41004.03 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 5124.23 |====== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 39207.13 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 5022.77 |====== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 39124.89 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 4707.44 |===== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 42949.65 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 4839.99 |===== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 47990.75 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 4779.94 |===== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 46833.17 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 5024.00 |===== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 42172.53 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 4697.23 |==== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 49037.56 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 4910.37 |===== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 46450.94 |============================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 64 Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 56.67 |================================================= GIMP 2.8.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 35.46 |================================================= GIMP 2.8.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 33.97 |================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 32 Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 28.79 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 182.46 |================= ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 509.49 |================================================ GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 28.51 |================================================= ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 15.74 |=========================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 3.16 |================================================== GIMP 2.8.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 13.49 |================================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 11.49 |================================================= GIMP 2.6.9 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 . 2.23 |===================================================== GIMP 2.6.9 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 . 2.23 |===================================================== GIMP 2.6.9 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 . 2.23 |===================================================== GIMP 2.6.9 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 . 2.22 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 397.15 |================== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 1011.83 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 224.72 |================== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 609.76 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 168.98 |============== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 581.27 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 43.54 |========= ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 233.65 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better ProLiant DL585 G2 .... 77.88 |================================== ProLiant DL385 Gen10 . 110.93 |================================================