Threadripper 3970X AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core testing with a ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0702 BIOS) and AMD Radeon VII 16GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Threadripper 3970X: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 32-Core @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG ZENITH II EXTREME (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 1000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Radeon VII 16GB (1801/1000MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 20 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Aquantia AQC107 NBase-T/IEEE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.2.4 (LLVM 9.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20200123, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 139.94 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Firefox Overall Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 752.71 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 15241 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 27.28 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 255 |===================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 0.129 |=================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 0.222 |=================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 0.859 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 94.84 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 37.22 |=================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 427.94 |================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 10.97 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 216.78 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 53.44 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 50.79 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 16.66 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 46.71 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 34.3 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 12 |====================================================== GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 89.50 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 97.2 |==================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 7.76 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 444 |===================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 0.79 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 21.36 |=================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 46363 |=================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 9 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 1.679 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 79.6 |==================================================== GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 61.08 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 292 |===================================================== GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 54.68 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 0.19 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 15.62 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 2 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 0.4 |===================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 14.97 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 12.48 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 228 |===================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 35771 |=================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 1.337 |=================================================== RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 42.25 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 15.66 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 38.01 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 5 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 1.18 |==================================================== GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 37.08 |=================================================== Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 21.49 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 98.8 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 95.2 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 167 |===================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 101 |===================================================== GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 30.16 |=================================================== Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 113476.44 |=============================================== GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 28.98 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 734.4 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 16.7 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 438 |===================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 24.72 |=================================================== Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 23.78 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 50.8 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 5.57 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 6.56 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Compute - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 62.14 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Bitmap - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 61.99 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Vector - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 62.07 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 21.9 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 104 |===================================================== librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 20.64 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 2.53 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 5.88 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 1303 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 361.1 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 4.4 |===================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 40.57 |=================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 11.24 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 4.28 |==================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 8.640 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 26.5 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 1.62 |==================================================== GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 7.156 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 71.34 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 5.024 |=================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 229.32 |================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Threadripper 3970X . 21.21 |===================================================