Docker testing on Clear Linux OS 29390 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2002049-HV-MIDGAR22552
midgar
Docker testing on Clear Linux OS 29390 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 @ 2.50GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX
OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #2:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 @ 2.50GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3 + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX
OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker
LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 455.97 |==============================================
John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 161248 |==============================================
NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 12728.41 |============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: Twofish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 143.63 |==============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: Twofish - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 147.81 |==============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: Blowfish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 111.97 |==============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: Blowfish - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 111.25 |==============================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 49439676531 |=========================================
x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 15.30 |===============================================
Zstd Compression 1.3.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 35.05 |===============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 59.40 |===============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 58.43 |===============================================
John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 4329 |================================================
x264 2018-09-25
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 26.29 |===============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: AES-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 1283.96 |=============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: AES-256 - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 1294.08 |=============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: KASUMI - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 41.12 |===============================================
Botan 2.8.0
Test: KASUMI - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 43.36 |===============================================
OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 513 |=================================================
System BZIP2 Decompression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 19.24 |===============================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 11976025.13 |=========================================
GnuPG 1.4.22
2GB File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 3.36 |================================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 442271.18 |===========================================
Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 12.04 |===============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 560656.98 |===========================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 579536.65 |===========================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 17719201 |============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 753272.15 |===========================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 795163.44 |===========================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 6219.60 |=============================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 3395486 |=============================================
Go Benchmarks
Test: http
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L #1 . 14508 |===============================================