midgar
Docker testing on Clear Linux OS 29390 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2630L: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 @ 2.50GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX

	OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker


x264 2018-09-25
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 26.29 |==================================================


x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 15.30 |==================================================


OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 513 |====================================================


NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 12728.41 |===============================================


Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 12.04 |==================================================


LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 455.97 |=================================================


Zstd Compression 1.3.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 35.05 |==================================================


System BZIP2 Decompression

Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 19.24 |==================================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: http
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 14508 |==================================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 17719201 |===============================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 49439676531 |============================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 3395486 |================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: KASUMI - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 43.36 |==================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: KASUMI - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 41.12 |==================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: AES-256 - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 1294.08 |================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: AES-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 1283.96 |================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Twofish - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 147.81 |=================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Twofish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 143.63 |=================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Blowfish - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 111.25 |=================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Blowfish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 111.97 |=================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 58.43 |==================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 59.40 |==================================================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 4329 |===================================================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 161248 |=================================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 795163.44 |==============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 579536.65 |==============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 442271.18 |==============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 753272.15 |==============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 560656.98 |==============================================


Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 11976025.13 |============================================


Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L . 6219.60 |================================================