midgar
Docker testing on Clear Linux OS 29390 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 @ 2.50GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3 v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Memory: 97280MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 PRO 512GB + 8002GB Western Digital WD80EFAX-68K + 2 x 256GB Samsung SSD 850 + 1000GB Western Digital WD10SPCX-08S + 2000GB Western Digital WD20EFRX-68A + 2 x 2000GB Western Digital WD2002FAEX-0 + 3001GB TOSHIBA DT01ACA3, Graphics: radeondrmfb, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Monitor: L194WTX

	OS: Clear Linux OS 29390, Kernel: 4.15.0-55-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.1.1 20190512 gcc-9-branch@271104 + Clang 8.0.0 + LLVM 8.0.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1440x900, System Layer: Docker


x264 2018-09-25
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 26.29 |================================================


x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 15.30 |================================================
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 14.93 |===============================================


OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 513 |==================================================
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 514 |==================================================


NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 12728.41 |=============================================


Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 12.04 |================================================


LZMA Compression
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 455.97 |===============================================


Zstd Compression 1.3.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 35.05 |================================================


System BZIP2 Decompression

Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 19.24 |================================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: http
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 14508 |================================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: json
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 17719201 |=============================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: build
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 49439676531 |==========================================


Go Benchmarks
Test: garbage
Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 3395486 |==============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: KASUMI - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 43.36 |================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: KASUMI - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 41.12 |================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: AES-256 - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 1294.08 |==============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: AES-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 1283.96 |==============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Twofish - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 147.81 |===============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Twofish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 143.63 |===============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Blowfish - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 111.25 |===============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: Blowfish - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 111.97 |===============================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 58.43 |================================================


Botan 2.8.0
Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 59.40 |================================================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 4329 |=================================================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 161248 |===============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 795163.44 |============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 579536.65 |============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 442271.18 |============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 753272.15 |============================================


Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2630L 0 . 560656.98 |============================================