Core i9 9900K Linux Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Core i9-9900K: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-9-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.2.4, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191130, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 33152.00 |=============================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 0.20 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 2 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 0.45 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 0.8 |==================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 5 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 1.43 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 21.32 |================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 68.99 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 7.158 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 4.810 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 82.47 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 27.08 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 33.65 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 25.99 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 55.99 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 52.55 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 34.95 |================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 4.69399 |================================================ LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 6.883 |================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 13.18 |================================================== Numpy Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 185.54 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 4.49 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 2.03 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 3.99 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 6.3 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 2.32 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 19.08 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 4.85 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 13.56 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 14.79 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 12.44 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 9.62 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 42.39 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 37.88 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 42.67 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 28.55 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 50.28 |================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 194 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 260 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 85.7 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 84.5 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 93.1 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 14.6 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 374 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 20.2 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 81.8 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 149 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 6.42 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 47.5 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 364 |==================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 0.224 |================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 0.863 |================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 1.348 |================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 9 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 1.695 |================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 50.60 |================================================== Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 7.970 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 708.8 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 15618 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 112 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 105.79 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 5.5 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 828.6 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 1080 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 23714 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 37.09 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 156.78 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 4.6 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 1296 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 28.3 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Bitmap - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 60.46 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Vector - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 60.62 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Compute - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 60.54 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 439.6 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 30.44 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Bitmap - Browser: Google Chrome fps > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 62.55 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Vector - Browser: Google Chrome fps > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 62.54 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Compute - Browser: Google Chrome fps > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 62.55 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 371.22 |================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 0.141 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 3.197 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 28.52 |================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 8.05 |=================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i9-9900K . 29.89 |==================================================