EPYC 7642 Memory Channel Test Benchmarks for a future article. 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200: Processor: AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core @ 2.30GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 129024MB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe 126GB, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.4.0-050400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.1 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200: Processor: AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core @ 2.30GHz (48 Cores / 96 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64512MB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe 63GB, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.4.0-050400-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.1 (LLVM 9.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2.086 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2.085 |=================================================== SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.269 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.163 |================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 412 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 404 |==================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 203 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 198 |==================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1020 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1019 |==================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 506 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 506 |===================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1053 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1104 |==================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 523 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 548 |===================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1021 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1034 |==================================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.16 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: Yes - Direct: No - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 507 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 514 |===================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1588509 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1274561 |======================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 37311 |=========================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 44284 |=================================================== IOR 3.2.1 Write Test MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1568.92 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1567.03 |================================================= IOR 3.2.1 Read Test MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1352.82 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1347.11 |================================================= RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 40168.29 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 36033.09 |=========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 29529.99 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 27889.61 |============================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 90088.9 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 45744.1 |========================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 88281.9 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 44842.7 |========================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 97207.8 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 49259.0 |========================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8806.7 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8477.6 |================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 14808.4 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 14239.8 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 15376.74 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 15053.89 |=============================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8995.55 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8692.56 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 102712.89 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 71484.89 |================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3371.90 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3388.41 |================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 40237.28 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 21718.80 |========================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 98601.11 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 64784.37 |================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 50248.77 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 27486.42 |========================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 61047.40 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 39582.78 |=============================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 111.48 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 85.76 |====================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16.92 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 13.28 |======================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16.92 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 13.28 |======================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 21.53 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 14.10 |================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 11.84250 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.98166 |======================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2.11874 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.08504 |========================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.18245 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.17205 |============================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.10985 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.14298 |================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.52375 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.35143 |=========================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16011.27 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 15882.34 |================================================ Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 22.50 |============================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 40.89 |=================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.933240 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.930197 |================================================ Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3.196558 |========================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.831549 |================================================ Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 91.87 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 90.15 |================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.35 |=========================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.42 |==================================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.398 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.053 |================================================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.346 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.887 |=================================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.022 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.711 |=================================================== NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.53981 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.55005 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.71 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.71 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2.12 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2.11 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.59 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.59 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.67 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.59 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3.58 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3.50 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 22.32 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 22.00 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.38 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.31 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 19.67 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 19.65 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 28.22 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 28.22 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16.40 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16.39 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 20.76 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 20.73 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 45.9 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 47.6 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 64.89 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 65.00 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 49.43 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 50.60 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 38.27 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 37.25 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 70.28 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 70.30 |=================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 102.93 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 104.11 |================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 6208 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 6235 |==================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5261 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5211 |==================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5005 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5203 |==================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7700 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7661 |==================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 60915 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 61067 |=================================================== Node.js Express HTTP Load Test Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7524 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7567 |==================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1529 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1523 |==================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 496 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 491 |==================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 496 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 494 |===================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 730 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 730 |===================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1814 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1729 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 571 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 564 |==================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1118 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1127 |==================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.43 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.46 |==================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34.48 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 33.33 |================================================= Embree 3.6.1 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 41.21 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 40.66 |================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.982 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.981 |=================================================== rav1e 0.2.0 Speed: 9 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.220 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1.220 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.955 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.008 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 59.75 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 60.05 |=================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 357.01 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 336.55 |=============================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 289.07 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 276.53 |================================================ VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.97 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.98 |==================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 18.32 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 18.07 |================================================== x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 150.41 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 152.45 |================================================== x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 48.31 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 48.20 |=================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 14.10 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 13.92 |================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.0.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 20.07 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 18.88 |================================================ Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1559344.26 |============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1558040.33 |============================================== LuxCoreRender 2.2 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.86 |============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.98 |==================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.2 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.90 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.79 |============================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3312.85 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3333.29 |================================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 227567 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 174582 |====================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 102088239 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 100120504 |============================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 103950643 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 103535492 |=============================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 604240209 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 605886108 |=============================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2607377 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2570869 |================================================ Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 758.56 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 760.82 |================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 26.48 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 26.62 |=================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 124.29 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 122.01 |================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 61.13 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 61.11 |=================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 15.08 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 14.98 |=================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.59740 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.54400 |================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 22.69 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 22.75 |=================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3.35065 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3.35198 |================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 4.42295 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 4.39508 |================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 22.26 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 23.31 |=================================================== Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.092 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.958 |=================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 79.89 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 78.22 |================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 220.78 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 220.02 |================================================== R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.3711 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.3566 |================================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 10268.7 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 10320.5 |================================================= libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 167.22 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 167.43 |================================================== GROMACS 2019.4 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 4.078 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 3.269 |========================================= MariaDB 10.3.8 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 939 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 937 |===================================================== MariaDB 10.3.8 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 369 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 368 |===================================================== MariaDB 10.3.8 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 301 |===================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 301 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 569843.05 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 574429.88 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 52151.15 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 52791.72 |================================================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 79.06 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 78.28 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.946 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 9.915 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.280 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 7.302 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 118.14 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 118.57 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 38.28 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 38.25 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 50.37 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 50.44 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 40.13 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 40.31 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 80.84 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 80.92 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 72.71 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 72.55 |=================================================== GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 49.25 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 49.38 |=================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 4.4.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16.91 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16.22 |================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1672023.47 |============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1618485.16 |============================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1902672.08 |============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1754713.15 |========================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1487985.34 |============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1433268.61 |============================================ Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5553387.89 |============================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5862459.89 |============================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 81400.75 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 81506.77 |================================================ Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.03 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 51130 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 51799 |=================================================== IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.239 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 5.046 |================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.910 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 8.758 |================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 21003 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 234 |= Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 206720 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 192120 |============================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 2937 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 202 |==== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 1104 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 136 |====== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 354730 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 349267 |================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 164594055 |============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 166600539 |=============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 356189 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 371013 |================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 166490 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 166668 |================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 6694754 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 6026968 |============================================ Blender 2.81 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 48.36 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 48.00 |=================================================== Blender 2.81 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 125.50 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 124.41 |================================================== Blender 2.81 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 189.87 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 189.52 |================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Add Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34916.7 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34276.8 |================================================ Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Get Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 52767.0 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 52076.5 |================================================ Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Set Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 33263.9 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 32447.2 |================================================ Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Append Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34309.7 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34807.1 |================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Replace Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34901.2 |================================================= 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 34579.4 |================================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 31931.92 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 32136.69 |================================================ Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 26203.47 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 26338.88 |================================================ Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 161.36 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 161.83 |================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 75.76 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 73.62 |================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 183.77 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 184.39 |================================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 10 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16886.53 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 16778.55 |================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 50 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 24006.92 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 24440.98 |================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 100 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 32465.32 |=============================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 33052.94 |================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 33421.71 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 32891.39 |=============================================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 33413.69 |================================================ 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 33252.40 |================================================ BRL-CAD 7.28.0 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 497750 |================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 497782 |================================================== SPECjbb 2015 SPECjbb2015-Composite max-jOPS jOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 99094 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 80777 |========================================== SPECjbb 2015 SPECjbb2015-Composite critical-jOPS jOPS > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 56261 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 43805 |======================================== POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 13.77 |=================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 13.69 |=================================================== SPEC CPU 2017 Copies: 1 - Benchmark: fprate Base Rate > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 6.73 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 6.75 |==================================================== SPEC CPU 2017 Copies: 1 - Benchmark: intrate Base Rate > Higher Is Better 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 4.12 |==================================================== 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 4.10 |==================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 218.85 |================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 217.29 |================================================== Numpy Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 260.21 |================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 253.81 |================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 15.03 |=================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 15.10 |=================================================== Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 10.57 |=================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 10.45 |================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.15 |==================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.15 |==================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 2 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.3 |===================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.3 |===================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.61 |=================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.62 |==================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 5 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.9 |===================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 0.9 |===================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 11.38 |================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 11.52 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2020-01-10 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 28.65 |================================================== 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 . 29.16 |===================================================