app22 Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6 testing with a HP ProLiant DL20 Gen9 (U22 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200EH on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9 (P89 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 300GB LOGICAL VOLUME + LUN 00 Media 0, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200EH, Network: 4 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5719 PCIe OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: HP ProLiant DL20 Gen9 (U22 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 240GB LOGICAL VOLUME, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200EH, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-1062.1.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 8804.92 |================================ Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 6570.46 |======================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 13732.77 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 11054.68 |========================= Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 20007.30 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 13245.66 |===================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 33725.70 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 25660.23 |======================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 17104.69 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 13374.92 |======================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 404.33 |====================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 613.87 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 79.81 |====================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 121.65 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 157.49 |============================= Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 178.51 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 435.13 |==================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 702.17 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 573.07 |==================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 961.54 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 776.17 |====================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 1105.48 |================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 139 |================================ Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 156 |==================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 507 |========================= Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 729 |==================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 24 |==================================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 25 |===================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 57 |======================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 87 |===================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 254 |================================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 266 |==================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 71 |================================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 78 |===================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 427 |========================= Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 617 |==================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 22908 |================================= Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 23756 |================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 157.35 |================================= Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 149.38 |=============================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 17.89 |================================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 11.56 |====================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 706.53 |=================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 1188.63 |================================ libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 115.23 |====================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 176.68 |================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 20689.65 |===================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 30677.06 |=============================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 19147.43 |======================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 24772.06 |=============================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 10 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 22222.30 |=============================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 50 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 11785.06 |============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 12152.87 |=============================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 100 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 22677.38 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 15452.41 |===================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 22482.47 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 13510.97 |=================== Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 22302.13 |=============================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 9234.17 |============= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz - 8 core . 9.10 |=================================== Intel E3-1240 v6 @ 3.70GHz - 4 core . 5.96 |=======================