Xeon E3 1270 v5 Intel Linux Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 testing with a ASUS E3 PRO GAMING V5 (2606 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT 256MB on Debian 9.11 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS E3 PRO GAMING V5 (2606 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Skylake, Memory: 2 x 4096 MB DDR4-2133MHz, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Debian 9.11, Kernel: 4.9.0-11-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170516, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 163 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 815 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 53 |=================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 85 |=================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 419 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 79 |=================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 685 |================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 7.45 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.23 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 0.56 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 9.09 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 0.66 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 6.77 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.86 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 100 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.43 |================================================= SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 15.87 |================================================ SVT-HEVC 1.4.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 21.65 |================================================ SVT-VP9 2019-09-09 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 98.17 |================================================ x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 7.66 |================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.1 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 0.87 |================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.1 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 0.90 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 35738.83 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 20973.70 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.84 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 36943.77 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 9.72 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 2.10 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 16.16 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.83 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 13.84 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 19.20 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 13.03 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.79 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 36801.67 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1.81 |================================================= Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1932430.86 |=========================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 2440927.13 |=========================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1842757.42 |=========================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1512921.95 |=========================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 2295351.67 |=========================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 1721296.92 |=========================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 . 8.22 |=================================================