2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core testing with a AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1909285-AS-1909277AS42
servers extra
2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core testing with a AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 386048MB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe 377GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.1.6 (LLVM 8.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20190909, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2 x EPYC 7742:
Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 516096MB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 256GB Micron_1100_MTFD, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710
OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.1.6 (LLVM 8.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20190909, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
dav1d 0.4.0
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 336.67 |======================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 710.57 |==============================================
dav1d 0.4.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 203.02 |=============================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 322.52 |==============================================
dav1d 0.4.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 376.13 |=======================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 759.10 |==============================================
dav1d 0.4.0
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 66.06 |=========================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 119.59 |==============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: cos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 48.11 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 53.84 |===============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: exp
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 5.10 |=======================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 6.21 |================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffs
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.66 |===================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.25 |================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sin
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 47.74 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 53.49 |===============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: log2
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 7.71 |================================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 7.41 |==============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: modf
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2.18 |=====================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.83 |================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sinh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 8.72 |===========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 9.76 |================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sqrt
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.92 |=================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.83 |================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: tanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 13.34 |==============================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 13.57 |===============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: asinh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 10.10 |============================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 10.73 |===============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: atanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 12.20 |=============================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 12.83 |===============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffsll
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.66 |===================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.25 |================================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sincos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 15.49 |===============================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 15.46 |===============================================
glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: pthread_once
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.67 |====================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.25 |================================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 9.37 |================================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 9.13 |===============================================
LeelaChessZero 0.22.0
Backend: BLAS
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 46.15 |===============================================
LeelaChessZero 0.22.0
Backend: Random
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 38336.27 |============================================
libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2
Test: Decompression Throughput
Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 182.91 |==============================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 171.98 |===========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 136418.98 |==========================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 227265.37 |===========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6199.89 |==================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 8168.88 |=============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6609.47 |===================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 8478.52 |=============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 47110.74 |===================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 108381.64 |===========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 140952.20 |===========================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 220925.11 |===========================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 70017.26 |================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 97133.69 |============================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 70587.17 |==========================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 116393.34 |===========================================
NeatBench 5
Acceleration: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 31.66 |=============================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 32.73 |===============================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2479594.69 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2372464.50 |========================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1934409.41 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 1718082.41 |=====================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1503870.50 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 1307446.91 |=====================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2429799.94 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2204547.33 |======================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1775219.12 |==========================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 1484539.42 |===================================
SVT-AV1 0.7
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 0.06 |================================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 0.05 |========================================
SVT-AV1 0.7
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 8.29 |=====================================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 10.47 |===============================================
SVT-AV1 0.7
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 66.89 |=============================
2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 104.62 |==============================================