servers extra 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core testing with a AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 386048MB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe 377GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.1.6 (LLVM 8.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20190909, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2 x EPYC 7742: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 516096MB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 256GB Micron_1100_MTFD, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-12-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.1.6 (LLVM 8.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20190909, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 dav1d 0.4.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 336.67 |====================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 710.57 |============================================== dav1d 0.4.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 203.02 |============================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 322.52 |============================================== dav1d 0.4.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 376.13 |======================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 759.10 |============================================== dav1d 0.4.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 66.06 |========================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 119.59 |============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 48.11 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 53.84 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 5.10 |======================================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 6.21 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.66 |=================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.25 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 47.74 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 53.49 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 7.71 |================================================ 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 7.41 |============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2.18 |===================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.83 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 8.72 |=========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 9.76 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.92 |================================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.83 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 13.34 |============================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 13.57 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 10.10 |============================================ 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 10.73 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 12.20 |============================================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 12.83 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.66 |=================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.25 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 15.49 |=============================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 15.46 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1.67 |==================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2.25 |================================================ LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 9.37 |================================================ 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 9.13 |=============================================== LeelaChessZero 0.22.0 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 46.15 |=============================================== LeelaChessZero 0.22.0 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 38336.27 |============================================ libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 182.91 |============================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 171.98 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 136418.98 |========================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 227265.37 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6199.89 |================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 8168.88 |============================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6609.47 |=================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 8478.52 |============================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 47110.74 |=================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 108381.64 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 140952.20 |=========================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 220925.11 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 70017.26 |================================ 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 97133.69 |============================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 70587.17 |========================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 116393.34 |=========================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 31.66 |============================================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 32.73 |=============================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2479594.69 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2372464.50 |======================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1934409.41 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 1718082.41 |===================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1503870.50 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 1307446.91 |===================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2429799.94 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 2204547.33 |====================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1775219.12 |========================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 1484539.42 |=================================== SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 0.06 |================================================ 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 0.05 |======================================== SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 8.29 |===================================== 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 10.47 |=============================================== SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Xeon Platinum 8280 . 66.89 |============================= 2 x EPYC 7742 .......... 104.62 |==============================================