haswell Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 testing with a MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB on Ubuntu 19.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.50GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 80GB INTEL SSDSCKGW08, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VE228, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-23-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 g: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.50GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 80GB INTEL SSDSCKGW08, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190806, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4 John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 13795 |=============================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 879701 |============================================== SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 24.98 |=============================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 312187.05 |=========================================== Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 1182.41 |============================================= Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 208.11 |============================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 163.70 |============================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 506.86 |============================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 293.71 |============================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 270.61 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 85.79 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 23372 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 162 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 135.12 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 10126 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 63.31 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 55.51 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 34.63 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 28652 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 159 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome Overall Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 201.01 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 132.69 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 12050 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 290.59 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 84.17 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 70.83 |=============================================== LeelaChessZero 0.22.0 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better g . 15.17 |==================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.22.0 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better g . 93439.23 |================================================================= SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better g . 0.05 |===================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better g . 2.39 |===================================================================== SVT-AV1 0.7 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better g . 24.89 |====================================================================