Xeon E5 video encode
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 testing with a MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB on Ubuntu 19.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3: 

	Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 @ 3.50GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X99S SLI PLUS (MS-7885) v1.0 (1.E0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 80GB INTEL SSDSCKGW08, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V

	OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190806, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4


AOM AV1 2019-09-16
AV1 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 0.08 |================================================


SVT-AV1 0.6
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 0.04 |================================================


SVT-AV1 0.6
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 2.82 |================================================


SVT-AV1 0.6
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 24.03 |===============================================


SVT-HEVC 1.4.1
1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 41.51 |===============================================


SVT-VP9 2019-09-09
1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 151.06 |==============================================


VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.1
vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 121.38 |==============================================


x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 39.16 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: cos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 59.27 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: exp
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 8.05 |================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffs
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 2.22 |================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sin
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 58.73 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: log2
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 9.77 |================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: modf
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 3.36 |================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sinh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 12.32 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sqrt
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 4.01 |================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: tanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 18.12 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: asinh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 14.37 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: atanh
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 17.31 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: ffsll
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 2.22 |================================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: sincos
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 19.02 |===============================================


glibc bench 1.0
Benchmark: pthread_once
nanoseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v3 . 2.23 |================================================