Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core testing with a MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) v1.0 (1.30 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4GB on Ubuntu 18.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Ryzen 5 2600X: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Six-Core @ 3.60GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) v1.0 (1.30 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 256GB INTEL SSDPEKKW256G7, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon R7 370 / R9 270/370 OEM 4GB, Audio: AMD Cape Verde/Pitcairn, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-10-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.2 (LLVM 7.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 26.56 |======================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 8.37 |========================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 16204.16 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 240.93 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 240.99 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 7750.29 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 21589.69 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 8496.72 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 5054.93 |====================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.20.1 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 129.42 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 4.82 |========================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 15.75 |======================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 77.83 |======================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 515.57 |======================================================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 3.16990 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 6317.80 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 6844.47 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 20434.37 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 23793.32 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 6683.40 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 12782.02 |===================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1313.83 |====================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 478.58 |======================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 276.33 |======================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1142.16 |====================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 2838.60 |====================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1833.49 |====================================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: KASUMI - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 95.60 |======================================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 91.87 |======================================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: AES-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 5693.83 |====================================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 5708.08 |====================================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Twofish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 355.15 |======================================================= Botan 2.8.0 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 359.14 |======================================================= Botan 2.8.0 Test: Blowfish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 277.00 |======================================================= Botan 2.8.0 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 275.42 |======================================================= Botan 2.8.0 Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 146.84 |======================================================= Botan 2.8.0 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 147.00 |======================================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 7409021 |====================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 13177 |======================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 429363 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2019-02-11 AV1 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 0.18 |========================================================= SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 18.60 |======================================================== SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 113.89 |======================================================= SVT-VP9 2019-09-09 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 97.61 |======================================================== x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 35.10 |======================================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 244831.81 |==================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 17691436 |===================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1176.67 |====================================================== Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 33.09 |======================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 15.77 |======================================================== LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 267.12 |======================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 50.94 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 37.14 |======================================================== dav1d 0.3 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 42.18 |======================================================== dav1d 0.3 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 13.66 |======================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 8.47 |========================================================= Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 7.66 |========================================================= Aircrack-ng 1.3 k/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 10984 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 49.70 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 8.43 |========================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1.86 |========================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 48.66 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 9.19 |========================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 2.12 |========================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 12.28 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 2.12 |========================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 12.62 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 15.96 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 11.78 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1.87 |========================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 14.61 |======================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1.86 |========================================================= Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores ns < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 203.31 |======================================================= libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 173.99 |======================================================= GROMACS 2018.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 0.61 |========================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 68.41 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 35.09 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 343.36 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1399.52 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 76.04 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 15.54 |======================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 28.97 |======================================================== GIMP 2.10.6 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 9.13 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.6 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 14.23 |======================================================== GIMP 2.10.6 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 16.18 |======================================================== GIMP 2.10.6 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 19.24 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1625.94 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 4044.80 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 35665.02 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 40824.07 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 97.67 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 137.47 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 2072.64 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 3860041.46 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 49215.14 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 17264.40 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1649.18 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 5175.89 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 3211852.39 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 403662.61 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 102.65 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 8014804.16 |=================================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 180 |========================================================== IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 0.87 |========================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1.85 |========================================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 265.53 |======================================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 698.27 |======================================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 396.75 |======================================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1073.01 |====================================================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 967.45 |======================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1206 |========================================================= NeatBench 5 Acceleration: All FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 9.86 |========================================================= NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 9.80 |========================================================= Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 27701.74 |===================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 578.16 |======================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 332.27 |======================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 311.77 |======================================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 6033 |========================================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 354.23 |======================================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 57.50 |======================================================== Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 154.60 |======================================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 1085 |========================================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 76.80 |======================================================== Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 8.31 |========================================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 24.60 |======================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 0.50 |========================================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600X . 2.27 |=========================================================