EPYC 7742 2P New Updated Tests 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core testing with a AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS) and llvmpipe 504GB on Ubuntu 19.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x EPYC 7742: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1001C BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-3200MT/s 36ASF4G72PZ-3G2E2, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA + 256GB Micron_1100_MTFD, Graphics: llvmpipe 504GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190902, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.0.8 (LLVM 8.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 243576.90 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 48976.73 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 6253.20 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 6216.38 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 107080.75 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 4284.76 |====================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 225796.55 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 100290.77 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 122985.90 |==================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 229.83 |======================================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 222.05 |======================================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 26.81 |======================================================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 46.36 |======================================================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 43.51 |======================================================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 142.57 |======================================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 75.12 |======================================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: All FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 32.57 |======================================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x EPYC 7742 . 32.40 |========================================================