mark4-1 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 testing with a HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB on openSUSE 15.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0803 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab20, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0803 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab20, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X 6-Core @ 3.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0803 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab20, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core @ 3.70GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0803 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz), Audio: AMD Device ab20, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Intel Core i9 9900K: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Intel Core i5 9400F: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: AMD Vega 20 16GB (1802/1001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: Acer B286HK, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190811, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 2 x Intel Xeon E5-3667v3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210 OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.129, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 59.62 |================================ Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 61.74 |================================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 20.85 |=============================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 21.87 |================================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 1.45296 |================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 2.06935 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 2.70469 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 2.29880 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 1.75577 |==================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1.39852 |================ Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 1.40053 |================ Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 2.71364 |=============================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 1.39807 |================ x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 139.25 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 92.94 |===================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 76.90 |================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 78.61 |================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 94.53 |====================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 91.10 |===================== Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 58.29 |============= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 90.55 |===================== x265 3.0 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 52.24 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 43.48 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 38.88 |========================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 30.27 |=================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 44.94 |============================ Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 10.86 |======= Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 10.81 |======= Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 33.58 |===================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 10.89 |======= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 61109 |================================= Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 60400 |================================= Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 37567127 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 26325499 |===================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 20453316 |================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 23329057 |=================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 25172823 |==================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 31382747 |========================= Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 31351929 |========================= Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 14071430 |=========== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 31564351 |========================= asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 39345381 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 28219892 |====================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 21564595 |================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 24205430 |================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 28046739 |===================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 33462707 |========================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 33654656 |========================== Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 15284406 |============ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 34046861 |========================== Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 836.17 |================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 41.87 |============ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 58.16 |================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 72.04 |===================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 76.09 |====================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 65.98 |=================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 62.28 |================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 62.31 |================== Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 112.17 |================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 62.35 |================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 936.89 |================================ Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 280.14 |================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 2425.57 |=============================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1178 |================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 15609.49 |============================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 15595.18 |============================== SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 109.31 |================================ Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 2157 |================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 644 |=================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 164733 |================================ Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1495 |================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 403 |=================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 103000 |================================ Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1696 |================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 843 |=================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 215800 |================================ Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1500 |================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 769 |=================================== Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory IOPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 196833 |================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 104.57 |================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 207.88 |================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 102.03 |================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1734.40 |=============================== Dbench 4.0 12 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 292.62 |================================ Dbench 4.0 1 Clients MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 57.53 |================================= Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1582.73 |=============================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 402.19 |================================ Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1975.75 |=============================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 4870 |================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 3.56 |================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 402.20 |================================ SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 248.00 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 193.00 |========================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 156.00 |==================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 149.00 |=================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 192.00 |========================= Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 148.83 |=================== Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 120.00 |=============== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 156.00 |==================== SVT-VP9 2019-02-17 1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 52.72 |================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 208 |=================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 642066116 |============================= Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 244.00 |============ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 334.00 |================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 412.00 |===================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 473.00 |======================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 370.00 |=================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 333.98 |================= Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 629.00 |================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 349.00 |================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 65.37 |================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 3.70 |================================== Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 17.90 |================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 10.43 |================================= Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 4056583.31 |============================ Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 49.66 |================================= Unigine Sanctuary 2.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 212.01 |================================ Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 70.27 |================================= Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 24 |==================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 7.80 |================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 32.93 |================================= Unigine Tropics 1.3 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 168.43 |================================ Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 58.04 |================================= Blender 2.80 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 378.74 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 382.81 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 114.00 |============ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 163.00 |================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 212.00 |====================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 195.00 |==================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 172.00 |================== Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 149.24 |================ Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 307.00 |================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 146.00 |=============== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 453.84 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1041.57 |=============================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 778.78 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 451.60 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1008.60 |=============================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 772.95 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 408.75 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 229.87 |================================ Blender 2.80 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X .................... 460.00 |=========== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X .................... 655.00 |================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X .................... 849.00 |===================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X .................... 775.00 |=================== Intel Core i9 9900K .................. 675.00 |================ Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 635.72 |=============== Intel Core i5 9400F .................. 1283.00 |=============================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 ............. 610.00 |=============== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1099.97 |=============================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1100.01 |=============================== Blender 2.80 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 525.90 |================================ Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 376.19 |================================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 368.77 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 371.37 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 342.96 |============================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 353.51 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 279.04 |==================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 373 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 377 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 369 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 294 |===================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 354 |============================================ Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 288 |==================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 293 |===================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 292 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 293 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 289 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 234 |====================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 288 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 240 |====================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 225 |==================================== SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 73.54 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 73.60 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 73.38 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 72.99 |============================================ Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 74.38 |============================================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 73.72 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 45.95 |============================ Darktable 2.6.0 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 11.17 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 11.41 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 11.10 |======================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 12.49 |============================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 13.78 |================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 13.19 |================================================ Darktable 2.6.0 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 4.54 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 5.34 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 6.09 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 6.23 |========================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 5.39 |==================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 7.66 |=================================================== Darktable 2.6.0 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 3.57 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 3.87 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 4.37 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 4.12 |======================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 4.20 |======================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 5.35 |=================================================== GIMP 2.10.8 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 17.16 |================================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 15.81 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 15.25 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 17.64 |================================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 15.02 |=========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 15.62 |============================================ GIMP 2.10.8 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 7.49 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 7.52 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 7.82 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 8.66 |=================================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 6.77 |======================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 8.24 |================================================= GIMP 2.10.8 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 11.80 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 11.80 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 11.88 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 13.26 |================================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 11.14 |========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 13.13 |================================================== GIMP 2.10.8 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 14.34 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 13.61 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 13.43 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 15.36 |================================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 12.67 |========================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 14.07 |============================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 271.99 |================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 378.97 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 481.78 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 422.69 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 421.19 |=========================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 774.80 |================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 168.73 |==================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 238.12 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 309.83 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 242.13 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 245.34 |============================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 406.82 |================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 162.52 |=================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 213.66 |========================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 272.97 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 225.60 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 232.07 |=========================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 421.10 |================================================= Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 531933 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 371430 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 279739 |======================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 269063 |====================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 394681 |================================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 186484 |=============== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 386949 |================================ Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 51.50 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 50.94 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 51.57 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 59.73 |====================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 51.21 |================================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 51.79 |================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 70.11 |============================================= Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 19.25 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 19.21 |================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 19.46 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 23.27 |========================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 23.29 |========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 19.95 |==================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 25.08 |============================================= Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 37862 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 36980 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 37108 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 32874 |===================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 39786 |============================================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 35034 |======================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 25742 |============================= Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 50093 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 49499 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 49221 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 42670 |====================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 45482 |========================================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 45494 |========================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 34657 |=============================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 226 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 225 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 223 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 197 |======================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 231 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 205 |========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 154 |=============================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 224 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 224 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 222 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 195 |========================================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 208 |============================================ Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 214 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 169 |=================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 227 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 220 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 219 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 181 |=================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 240 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 200 |======================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 155 |============================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 28291 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 19595 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 14599 |======================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 17919 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 16678 |=========================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 9772 |================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 20060 |================================ GROMACS 2018.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 0.98 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 0.76 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 0.66 |======================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 0.72 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 0.84 |=============================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 0.74 |=========================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 1.25 |============================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 326 |====== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 318 |====== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 322 |====== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 530 |========== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 638 |============ Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 780 |============== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 2512 |============================================== SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 46.04 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 35.40 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 26.09 |========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 25.98 |========================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 35.21 |================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 22.46 |====================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 31.34 |=============================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 179 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 136 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 141 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 135 |================================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 191 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 128 |=============================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 175 |=========================================== dav1d 0.3 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 8.04 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 9.79 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 10.58 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 11.78 |============================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 7.68 |============================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 12.68 |================================================== dav1d 0.3 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 21.87 |========================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 26.08 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 30.71 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 34.28 |======================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 26.56 |=============================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 42.61 |================================================== Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 17.96 |============================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 22.34 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 27.25 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 28.94 |============================================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 24.20 |====================================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 28.79 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 17.08 |=========================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 25.49 |========================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 31.51 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 38.83 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 39.42 |======================================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 28.46 |============================ Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 45.85 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 24.13 |======================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 919 |========================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 941 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 959 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 1105 |=============================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 801 |======================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 954 |=========================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 1626 |============================================== Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 13786886343 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 13750338997 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 13590439245 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 16001189628 |=============================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 11015445747 |====================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 12825856452 |========================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 19929462536 |======================================= Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 4911 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 5216 |============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 6568 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 5797 |================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 4353 |========================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 7916 |============================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 6514 |====================================== Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 4064232 |====================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 5816657 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 7583507 |======================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 6529598 |=================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 5738127 |============================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 8114011 |=========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 4447534 |======================== Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 859808 |================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 1173265 |========================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 1563993 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 1376986 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 1151564 |======================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 2056607 |=========================================== 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 1446990 |============================== Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 36.15 |===================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 40.70 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 44.79 |========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 45.82 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 44.04 |========================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 76.42 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 58.78 |=================================== Tensorflow 2017-02-03 Build: Cifar10 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 21.88 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 25.93 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 27.57 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 36.12 |================================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 23.86 |================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 33.54 |============================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 17.53 |=============== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 24.91 |===================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 32.58 |============================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 27.66 |======================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 28.03 |======================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 52.83 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 24.01 |==================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 23.98 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 26.78 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 30.58 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 30.89 |=================================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 25.05 |============================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 39.37 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 30.47 |=================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 6.88 |==================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 8.30 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 11.68 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 9.26 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 7.71 |====================== Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 15.51 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 14.63 |========================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ........ 7.52 |================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ........ 10.26 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ........ 13.49 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ........ 11.75 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K ...... 10.00 |======================= Intel Core i5 9400F ...... 19.24 |============================================= 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 11.78 |============================ Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1.20 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1.30 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.30 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.28 |========================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 1.52 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.60 |=================================================== Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 314 MAX: 390 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 283 MAX: 346 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 286 MAX: 347 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 83 AVG: 268 MAX: 321 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 232 MAX: 363 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 174 MAX: 265 Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1.76 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2.01 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.79 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.74 |==================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 2.44 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 2.29 |================================================ Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 82 AVG: 213 MAX: 308 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 188 MAX: 312 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 206 MAX: 379 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 169 MAX: 225 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 49 AVG: 145 MAX: 230 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 54 AVG: 126 MAX: 258 Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1.25 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1.35 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.21 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.21 |================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 1.53 |=========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.81 |=================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 81 AVG: 234 MAX: 392 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 217 MAX: 402 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 239 MAX: 370 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 193 MAX: 347 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 49 AVG: 188 MAX: 314 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 53 AVG: 133 MAX: 217 SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.21 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.21 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.21 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.21 |=========================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.24 |================================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.25 |=================================================== SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 80 AVG: 354 MAX: 411 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 344 MAX: 394 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 343 MAX: 392 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 350 MAX: 403 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 49 AVG: 304 MAX: 353 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 54 AVG: 292 MAX: 342 Blender 2.80 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 80 AVG: 233 MAX: 248 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 169 MAX: 177 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 164 MAX: 171 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 222 MAX: 230 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 50 AVG: 139 MAX: 149 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 106 MAX: 110 Blender 2.80 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 238 MAX: 245 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 171 MAX: 176 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 160 MAX: 163 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 215 MAX: 222 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 141 MAX: 150 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 105 MAX: 107 Darktable 2.6.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 152 MAX: 191 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 125 MAX: 151 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 129 MAX: 150 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 110 MAX: 149 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 81 MAX: 103 Darktable 2.6.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X . MIN: 77 AVG: 125 MAX: 199 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X . MIN: 72 AVG: 106 MAX: 152 GIMP 2.10.8 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 129 MAX: 151 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 115 MAX: 123 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 104 MAX: 117 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 118 MAX: 143 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 84 MAX: 112 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 67 MAX: 75 GIMP 2.10.8 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 107 MAX: 123 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 95 MAX: 106 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 95 MAX: 105 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 65 MAX: 76 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 58 MAX: 62 GIMP 2.10.8 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 80 AVG: 128 MAX: 143 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 105 MAX: 120 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 96 MAX: 113 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 79 MAX: 109 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 60 MAX: 72 Appleseed 2.0 Beta System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 232 MAX: 243 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 169 MAX: 174 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 162 MAX: 167 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 218 MAX: 228 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 141 MAX: 151 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 101 MAX: 104 Appleseed 2.0 Beta System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 234 MAX: 242 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 168 MAX: 171 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 165 MAX: 169 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 224 MAX: 232 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 138 MAX: 140 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 105 MAX: 106 Appleseed 2.0 Beta System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 233 MAX: 242 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 169 MAX: 171 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 161 MAX: 164 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 224 MAX: 231 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 139 MAX: 161 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 100 MAX: 101 Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 80 AVG: 216 MAX: 244 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 168 MAX: 177 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 156 MAX: 166 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 193 MAX: 213 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 142 MAX: 156 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 101 MAX: 105 Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 199 MAX: 244 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 159 MAX: 176 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 153 MAX: 167 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 196 MAX: 220 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 128 MAX: 167 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 97 MAX: 105 Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 2847.10 |======================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2508.53 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2150.98 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1895.85 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 3386.01 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 2306.20 |================================= Coremark 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 187 MAX: 219 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 148 MAX: 162 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 130 MAX: 143 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 142 MAX: 182 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 117 MAX: 140 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 81 MAX: 90 Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 116 MAX: 124 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 102 MAX: 113 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 100 MAX: 110 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 107 MAX: 127 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 72 MAX: 82 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 61 MAX: 68 Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 113 MAX: 134 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 99 MAX: 113 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 98 MAX: 111 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 103 MAX: 120 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 43 AVG: 67 MAX: 77 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 61 MAX: 69 Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 334.27 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 384.79 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 383.73 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 328.59 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 613.10 |================================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 599.20 |================================================ Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 113 MAX: 134 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 96 MAX: 111 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 97 MAX: 111 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 100 MAX: 120 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 65 MAX: 80 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 58 MAX: 69 Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 452.48 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 504.48 |================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 507.02 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 422.18 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 680.15 |=========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 777.39 |================================================= Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 111 MAX: 133 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 98 MAX: 118 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 97 MAX: 116 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 101 MAX: 122 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 67 MAX: 88 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 59 MAX: 71 Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1.99 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2.26 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2.26 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.90 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 3.46 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 3.49 |=================================================== Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 114 MAX: 128 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 99 MAX: 110 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 99 MAX: 111 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 104 MAX: 123 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 67 MAX: 82 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 59 MAX: 71 Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome Score Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1.94 |============================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2.21 |================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2.21 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.78 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 3.04 |============================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 3.56 |=================================================== Selenium System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 116 MAX: 142 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 101 MAX: 115 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 101 MAX: 114 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 110 MAX: 129 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 68 MAX: 83 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 60 MAX: 70 libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 2.31 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2.51 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2.59 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.96 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 3.92 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 3.74 |================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 140.94 |================================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 131.82 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 108.41 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 98.66 |================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 125.73 |============================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 110.61 |====================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 201 MAX: 225 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 149 MAX: 165 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 135 MAX: 146 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 182 MAX: 207 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 133 MAX: 157 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 88 MAX: 93 GROMACS 2018.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.00 | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.00 | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.00 | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.00 | Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.01 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.01 |=================================================== GROMACS 2018.3 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 199 MAX: 212 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 155 MAX: 160 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 150 MAX: 155 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 200 MAX: 212 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 144 MAX: 151 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 108 MAX: 111 CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 155 MAX: 163 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 125 MAX: 132 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 119 MAX: 127 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 141 MAX: 148 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 115 MAX: 120 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 85 MAX: 89 SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.29 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.31 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.21 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.19 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.35 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.27 |======================================= SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 2.14 |=================================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1.73 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.58 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.24 |============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 1.86 |============================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.65 |======================================= SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X . MIN: 74 AVG: 116 MAX: 234 VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1.05 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1.00 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.05 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.80 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 1.56 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.45 |=============================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 171 MAX: 204 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 135 MAX: 159 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 71 AVG: 134 MAX: 159 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 110 AVG: 168 MAX: 201 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 123 MAX: 165 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 88 MAX: 103 x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.88 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.67 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.66 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.45 |========================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.93 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.71 |======================================= x265 3.0 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.29 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.30 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.27 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.17 |====================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.40 |=================================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.35 |============================================= x265 3.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 180 MAX: 218 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 143 MAX: 168 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 144 MAX: 160 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 178 MAX: 211 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 112 MAX: 146 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 97 MAX: 111 dav1d 0.3 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 184 MAX: 222 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 157 MAX: 174 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 141 MAX: 160 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 183 MAX: 210 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 128 MAX: 150 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 94 MAX: 104 Zstd Compression 1.3.4 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 77 AVG: 150 MAX: 171 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 123 MAX: 136 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 116 MAX: 129 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 139 MAX: 158 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 113 MAX: 128 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 82 MAX: 92 XZ Compression 5.2.4 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 158 MAX: 184 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 135 MAX: 154 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 124 MAX: 142 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 145 MAX: 175 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 126 MAX: 176 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 84 MAX: 95 Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 160646.26 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 155686.49 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 127374.61 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 111706.02 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 181677.15 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 139652.94 |=================================== Stockfish 9 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 234 MAX: 244 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 169 MAX: 174 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 161 MAX: 165 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 209 MAX: 220 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 139 MAX: 154 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 101 MAX: 105 asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 166630.69 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 165344.01 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 139128.31 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 117198.66 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 198396.58 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 152150.93 |=================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 236 MAX: 244 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 171 MAX: 175 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 155 MAX: 159 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 207 MAX: 213 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 141 MAX: 146 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 100 MAX: 103 PyBench 2018-02-16 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 116 MAX: 121 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 97 MAX: 104 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 97 MAX: 104 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 70 MAX: 76 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 58 MAX: 61 NAMD 2.13b1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 228 MAX: 242 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 169 MAX: 174 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 159 MAX: 164 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 222 MAX: 233 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 141 MAX: 166 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 108 MAX: 110 Go Benchmarks System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 104 MAX: 120 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 96 MAX: 103 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 91 MAX: 102 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 99 MAX: 110 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 44 AVG: 66 MAX: 74 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 58 MAX: 62 Go Benchmarks System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 173 MAX: 213 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 109 MAX: 144 Go Benchmarks System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 167 MAX: 239 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 135 MAX: 172 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 135 MAX: 161 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 46 AVG: 120 MAX: 144 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 78 MAX: 109 Go Benchmarks System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 177 MAX: 237 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 143 MAX: 174 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 118 MAX: 166 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 87 MAX: 105 Rust Mandelbrot System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 79 AVG: 119 MAX: 187 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 101 MAX: 143 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 71 AVG: 106 MAX: 129 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 121 MAX: 176 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 78 MAX: 135 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 64 MAX: 80 Tensorflow 2017-02-03 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 171 MAX: 208 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 140 MAX: 165 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 135 MAX: 155 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 177 MAX: 203 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 116 MAX: 157 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 93 MAX: 106 Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 78 AVG: 204 MAX: 241 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 150 MAX: 171 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 146 MAX: 160 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 183 MAX: 220 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 126 MAX: 145 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 93 MAX: 99 Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 157 MAX: 197 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 131 MAX: 160 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 127 MAX: 154 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 75 AVG: 160 MAX: 203 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 119 MAX: 157 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 83 MAX: 98 Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 76 AVG: 156 MAX: 228 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 118 MAX: 148 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 92 MAX: 142 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 80 MAX: 98 Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1689.59 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1433.66 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1284.88 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1593.40 |============================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 1452.53 |========================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 1695.16 |================================================ System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Watts AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 184 MAX: 411 AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 149 MAX: 402 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 71 AVG: 144 MAX: 395 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 180 MAX: 403 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 43 AVG: 124 MAX: 363 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 92 MAX: 111 GIMP 2.10.8 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 98 MAX: 125 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 97 MAX: 116 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 67 MAX: 81 SVT-AV1 0.5 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 115 MAX: 169 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 73 AVG: 127 MAX: 162 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 100 MAX: 148 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 82 MAX: 106 dav1d 0.3 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 118 MAX: 151 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 120 MAX: 147 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 83 MAX: 97 Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... MIN: 74 AVG: 144 MAX: 172 AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... MIN: 72 AVG: 128 MAX: 156 Intel Core i9 9900K . MIN: 45 AVG: 105 MAX: 142 Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 48 AVG: 87 MAX: 102 Darktable 2.6.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 5 3600X . MIN: 73 AVG: 80 MAX: 104 AMD Ryzen 7 2700X . MIN: 73 AVG: 74 MAX: 76 Darktable 2.6.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 68 MAX: 100 x264 2018-09-25 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5 9400F . MIN: 49 AVG: 82 MAX: 104 Tesseract 2014-05-12 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.75 |==================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1.12 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.49 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.35 |===================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.72 |==================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.87 |=================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.75 |==================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1.15 |============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.48 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1.16 |=============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.72 |=================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.93 |=================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.59 |=================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.89 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1.16 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.92 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.58 |================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.61 |=================================================== SuperTuxKart 0.9.3 Performance / Cost - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Ultimate - Karts: 6 - Scene: Candela City Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.15 |================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.22 |======================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.29 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.29 |============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.15 |================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.49 |=================================================== Blender 2.80 Performance / Cost - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 56756.26 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 53603.97 |============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 52847.76 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 49458.88 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 84780.28 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 45671.48 |========================= Blender 2.80 Performance / Cost - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 229584.91 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 215629.89 |============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 211341.24 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 196778.88 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 333479.64 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 191162.53 |========================== Darktable 2.6.0 Performance / Cost - Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 5573.83 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 3753.89 |========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2763.90 |=================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 3172.46 |====================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 6807.32 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 1965.31 |============== Darktable 2.6.0 Performance / Cost - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 2265.46 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1756.86 |================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1516.41 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1582.42 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 2662.66 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 1141.34 |===================== Darktable 2.6.0 Performance / Cost - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1781.43 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1273.23 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1088.13 |========================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1046.48 |======================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 2074.80 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 797.15 |================== GIMP 2.10.8 Performance / Cost - Test: unsharp-mask Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 8562.84 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 5201.49 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 3797.25 |===================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 4480.56 |========================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 7419.88 |========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 2327.38 |============= GIMP 2.10.8 Performance / Cost - Test: resize Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 3737.51 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2474.08 |================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1947.18 |========================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 2199.64 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 3344.38 |=========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1227.76 |================ GIMP 2.10.8 Performance / Cost - Test: rotate Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 5888.20 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 3882.20 |================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2958.12 |======================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 3368.04 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 5503.16 |============================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 1956.37 |================ GIMP 2.10.8 Performance / Cost - Test: auto-levels Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 7155.66 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 4477.69 |============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 3344.07 |====================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 3901.44 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 6258.98 |========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 2096.43 |============== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Performance / Cost - Scene: Emily Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 135723.01 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 124681.13 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 119963.22 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 107363.26 |======================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 208067.86 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 115445.20 |========================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Performance / Cost - Scene: Disney Material Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 84196.27 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 78341.48 |============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 77147.67 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 61501.02 |======================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 121197.96 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 60616.18 |======================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Performance / Cost - Scene: Material Tester Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 81097.48 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 70294.14 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 67969.53 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 57302.40 |======================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 114642.58 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 62743.90 |========================= Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 Performance / Cost - Time To Compile Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 121551.41 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 109741.24 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 102588.00 |========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 120218.20 |============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 182962.78 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 93791.03 |======================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Performance / Cost - Time To Compile Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 20893.13 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 19134.64 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 17937.96 |========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 19326.86 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 32594.12 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 16713.33 |======================== Coremark 1.0 Performance / Cost - CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 1066.00 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1128.97 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1123.45 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1059.30 |========================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 798.95 |=============================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1251.57 |================================================ Selenium Performance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 25698.50 |=============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 16759.26 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 12840.93 |======================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 15171.42 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 25297.74 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 7716.71 |============== Selenium Performance / Cost - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 9605.75 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 6320.09 |========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 4845.54 |==================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 5910.58 |======================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 11505.26 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 2972.55 |============ Selenium Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 75.88 |================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 112.40 |======================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 149.03 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 129.43 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 80.54 |================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 235.13 |================================================= Selenium Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 100.39 |================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 150.45 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 197.67 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 167.99 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 92.07 |=============== Intel Core i5 9400F . 305.33 |================================================= Selenium Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.45 |================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.68 |========================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.90 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.78 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.47 |================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.38 |=================================================== Selenium Performance / Cost - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome Score Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.45 |================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.68 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.89 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.77 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.42 |=============== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.44 |=================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Performance / Cost - Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.45 |================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.67 |========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.88 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.71 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.49 |=================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1.34 |=================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Performance / Cost - Test: Blowfish Real C/S Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 56.70 |======================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 59.56 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 58.63 |========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 70.55 |================================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 33.76 |======================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 65.58 |============================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Performance / Cost - Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 162539.27 |======================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 104733.86 |=============== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 80068.44 |============ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 134703.82 |==================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 315191.76 |============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 116267.68 |================= SVT-AV1 0.5 Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.09 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.11 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.10 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.10 |================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.07 |======================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.15 |=================================================== SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 Performance / Cost - 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.50 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.59 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.63 |======================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.59 |===================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.39 |========================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.81 |=================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 Performance / Cost - vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.36 |===================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.41 |======================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.57 |================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.53 |=============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.39 |======================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.86 |=================================================== x264 2018-09-25 Performance / Cost - H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.28 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.28 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.31 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.31 |========================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.19 |========================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.39 |=================================================== x265 3.0 Performance / Cost - H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 0.10 |====================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 0.13 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 0.16 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 0.12 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 0.09 |==================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 0.23 |=================================================== dav1d 0.3 Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 4011.96 |================================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 3220.91 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2634.42 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 2992.12 |==================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 3793.92 |============================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 1889.32 |======================= dav1d 0.3 Performance / Cost - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 10913.13 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 8580.32 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 7646.79 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 8707.12 |=============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 13120.64 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 6348.89 |======================= Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 8962.04 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 7349.86 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 6785.25 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 7350.76 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 11954.80 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 4289.71 |================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Performance / Cost - Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 12719.51 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 10366.79 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 9668.67 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 10012.68 |================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 14059.24 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 6831.65 |======================= Stockfish 9 Performance / Cost - Total Time Nodes Per Second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 75284.82 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 80016.71 |======================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 82141.83 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 91846.68 |============================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 50957.13 |========================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 94439.13 |=============================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 Performance / Cost - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second Per Dollar > Higher Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 78848.46 |=================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 85774.75 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 86604.80 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 95296.97 |=========================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 56774.78 |========================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 102579.91 |============================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Performance / Cost - Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 458581.00 |============================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 309589.00 |=============================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 238791.00 |======================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 280670.00 |============================ Intel Core i9 9900K . 395694.00 |======================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 142146.00 |============== NAMD 2.13b1 Performance / Cost - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 725.03 |========================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 680.82 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 673.47 |====================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 583.90 |================================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 867.35 |================================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 404.33 |======================= Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 6879656285157.00 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 4523861530013.00 |========================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 3384019372005.00 |=================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 4064302165512.00 |======================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 5441630199018.00 |=============================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1911052611348.00 |=========== Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 2450589.00 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1716064.00 |================================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1635432.00 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1472438.00 |=========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 2150382.00 |======================================= Intel Core i5 9400F . 1179484.00 |====================== Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 2028051768.00 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 1913680153.00 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 1888293243.00 |============================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 1658517892.00 |========================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 2834634738.00 |========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 1208987639.00 |================== Go Benchmarks Performance / Cost - Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 429044192.00 |================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 386004185.00 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 389434257.00 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 349754444.00 |========================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 568872616.00 |=========================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 306434443.00 |======================= Rust Mandelbrot Performance / Cost - Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 18038.85 |======================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 13390.30 |============================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 11152.71 |======================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 11638.28 |========================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 21755.76 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 11386.58 |========================= Tensorflow 2017-02-03 Performance / Cost - Build: Cifar10 Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 10918.12 |============================================ AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 8530.97 |================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 6864.93 |=========================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 9174.48 |===================================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 11786.84 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 4997.46 |==================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Performance / Cost - Scene: Hair Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 8747.47 |============================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 8195.39 |============================ AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 8112.42 |============================ AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 7025.64 |======================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 13846.82 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 7871.67 |=========================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Performance / Cost - Scene: Water Caustic Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 11966.02 |============================================= AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 8810.62 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 7614.42 |============================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 7846.06 |============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 12374.70 |=============================================== Intel Core i5 9400F . 5866.13 |====================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Performance / Cost - Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 3433.12 |=========================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 2730.70 |================================== AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 2908.32 |===================================== AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 2352.04 |============================== Intel Core i9 9900K . 3808.74 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 2310.99 |============================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Performance / Cost - Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds x Dollar < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ... 3752.48 |==================================== AMD Ryzen 7 3700X ... 3375.54 |================================= AMD Ryzen 5 3600X ... 3359.01 |================================= AMD Ryzen 7 2700X ... 2984.50 |============================= Intel Core i9 9900K . 4940.00 |================================================ Intel Core i5 9400F . 2866.76 |============================ Darktable 2.6.2 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 8.04 |============================================== Darktable 2.6.2 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 6.09 |============================================== Darktable 2.6.2 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 3.86 |============================================== GIMP 2.8.22 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 45.66 |============================================= GIMP 2.8.22 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 9.62 |============================================== GIMP 2.8.22 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 23.38 |============================================= GIMP 2.8.22 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667v3 . 22.80 |=============================================