2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 testing with a HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB on openSUSE 15.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1908195-CJCO-MERGE9728
mark4-1
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 testing with a HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB on openSUSE 15.1 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (324/324MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210
OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210
OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #3:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210
OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #4:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210
OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #5:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210
OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #6:
Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 @ 3.60GHz (16 Cores), Motherboard: HP 2129 v1.01 (M60 v02.48 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 512GB SAMSUNG MZHPV512 + 2 x 4001GB External USB 3.0 + 2 x 512GB MTFDDAK512MBF-1A + 2000GB Hitachi HDS5C302 + 750GB Seagate ST3750640AS, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (666/3004MHz), Audio: Intel C610/X99, Monitor: DELL U2410, Network: Intel I218-LM + Intel I210
OS: openSUSE 15.1, Kernel: 4.12.14-lp151.28.13-default (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.12.8, Display Server: X Server 1.20.3, Display Driver: NVIDIA 390.116, OpenGL: 4.5.0, Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1582.73 |===============================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 402.19 |================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1975.75 |===============================
ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1178 |==================================
Unigine Heaven 4.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 49.66 |=================================
Unigine Valley 1.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 58.04 |=================================
Dbench 4.0
12 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 292.62 |================================
Dbench 4.0
1 Clients
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 57.53 |=================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 2157 |==================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 644 |===================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 164733 |================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1495 |==================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 403 |===================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 103000 |================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1696 |==================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 843 |===================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 215800 |================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1500 |==================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 769 |===================================
Flexible IO Tester 3.1
Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory
IOPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 196833 |================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 104.57 |================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 207.88 |================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 102.03 |================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1734.40 |===============================
Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 3.56 |==================================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 59.62 |================================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 61.74 |=================================
Rodinia 2.4
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 20.85 |===============================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 21.87 |=================================
NAMD 2.13b1
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1.39852 |===============================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 1.40053 |===============================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 4870 |==================================
Primesieve 7.4
1e12 Prime Number Generation
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 17.90 |=================================
Stockfish 9
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 31382747 |==============================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 31351929 |==============================
7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 61109 |=================================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 60400 |=================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 333.98 |================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 3.70 |==================================
asmFish 2018-07-23
1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth
Nodes/second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 33462707 |==============================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 33654656 |==============================
Timed GCC Compilation 8.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 836.17 |================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 62.28 |=================================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 62.31 |=================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 15609.49 |==============================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 15595.18 |==============================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 4056583.31 |============================
Swet 1.5.16
Average
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 642066116 |=============================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.30
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 208 |===================================
SVT-VP9 2019-02-17
1080p 8-bit YUV To VP9 Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 52.72 |=================================
x264 2018-09-25
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 91.10 |=================================
x265 3.0
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 10.86 |=================================
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #2 . 10.81 |=================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 65.37 |=================================
TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 402.20 |================================
SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03
1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 148.83 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 378.74 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 382.81 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 149.24 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 453.84 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1041.57 |===============================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 778.78 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 451.60 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1008.60 |===============================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 772.95 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 408.75 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 229.87 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 635.72 |================================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CUDA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1099.97 |===============================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 1100.01 |===============================
Blender 2.80
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 525.90 |================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: Serial
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 936.89 |================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 280.14 |================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 10.43 |=================================
Unigine Sanctuary 2.3
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 212.01 |================================
Unigine Superposition 1.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 70.27 |=================================
Unigine Superposition 1.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 24 |====================================
Unigine Superposition 1.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 7.80 |==================================
Unigine Superposition 1.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 32.93 |=================================
Unigine Tropics 1.3
Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Mode: Fullscreen
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 168.43 |================================
OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 2425.57 |===============================
SQLite 3.22
Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Z840 2 x E5-2667v3, 512GB Z Drive #1 . 109.31 |================================