Ryzen 9 3900X CPU Governors AMD Ryzen 9 3900X benchmarks under Linux by Michael Larabel. CPUFreq Ondemand: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Device aae0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190725, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Performance: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Device aae0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190725, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Powersave: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Device aae0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190725, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Schedutil: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (0702 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Device 1480, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB Force MP600, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Device aae0, Monitor: ASUS VP28U, Network: Realtek Device 8125 + Intel I211 + Intel Device 2723 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.3.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20190725, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.2 (LLVM 8.0.0), Compiler: GCC 7.4.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 323.14 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 322.12 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 580.24 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 323.59 |=========================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 5128.27 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 5230.35 |============================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 8864.57 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5261.11 |============================ Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4948.86 |================================ CPUFreq Performance . 4676.57 |============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 7522.60 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4825.79 |=============================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 6013.34 |========================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5783.34 |========================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 6814.79 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5885.21 |========================================= Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 12479.63 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 12652.22 |============================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 20240.05 |=============================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 13043.05 |============================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 17466.40 |============================== CPUFreq Performance . 17212.66 |============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 27386.26 |=============================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17772.25 |=============================== Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 6074.74 |====================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5396.03 |================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 7739.32 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6652.34 |========================================= Renaissance 0.9.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11081.44 |================================= CPUFreq Performance . 10923.39 |================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 15679.15 |=============================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11112.20 |================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 28442 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 28419 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 15845 |============================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 28372 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.5 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 45.53 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 48.45 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 28.01 |============================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 41.76 |=========================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 170.80 |=================================== CPUFreq Performance . 241.28 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 140.89 |============================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 137.79 |============================ x265 3.0 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 51.87 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 56.07 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 31.44 |============================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 40.58 |==================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 531964.52 |============================================= CPUFreq Performance . 541803.14 |============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 292787.97 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 529866.42 |============================================= Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 679.51 |============================== CPUFreq Performance . 608.83 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 1083.61 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 687.28 |============================== Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 290.98 |================================ CPUFreq Performance . 291.65 |================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 451.06 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 279.36 |============================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.66 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 7.68 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.90 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 7.77 |========================== Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3.33 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 3.32 |============================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 6.00 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3.34 |============================ libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 228.35 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 226.64 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 113.02 |======================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 229.08 |================================================= GROMACS 2018.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 0.99 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 0.99 |=================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 0.74 |====================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 0.99 |=================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 271.06 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 268.04 |============================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 470.02 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 271.85 |============================ Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 167.11 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 166.07 |============================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 294.98 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 167.27 |============================ Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 163.05 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 163.21 |============================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 275.78 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 164.03 |============================= Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 19.63 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 18.74 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 35.65 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 22.49 |================================ Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 48571 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 49681 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 23648 |======================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 48715 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 274 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 291 |==================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 154 |============================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 230 |========================================= Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome Overall Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1091.83 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1150.37 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 744.54 |=============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 963.88 |======================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 223.97 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 231.91 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 116.55 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 215.65 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 19851 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 19908 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 12070 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17245 |=========================================== Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 690.67 |============================================= CPUFreq Performance . 744.52 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 403.18 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 679.13 |============================================= Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.17 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 146.02 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 77.54 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 122.35 |========================================= Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 135.00 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 139.30 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 73.73 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 133.00 |===============================================