kernel_test Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 testing with a Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and astdrmfb on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite. kernel test suite: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 3.40GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR4-2133MT/s Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1, Disk: 480GB SMC3108 + 2000GB SMC3108, Graphics: astdrmfb OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 5.13 |===================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 273.97 |=================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 422.37 |=================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 367.03 |=================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 1764.40 |================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 1 MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 374.75 |=================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 6 MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 3789.59 |================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 12 MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 6596.93 |================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 48 MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 6555.56 |================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 128 MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 5946.95 |================================================== Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 256 MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 5751.55 |================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 5891.72 |================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 4010.33 |================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 491.88 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 461.44 |=================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 6132.83 |================================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 493.59 |=================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 1672.85 |================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 236.79 |=================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 521.59 |=================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 3554 |===================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 3.84 |===================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 36265 |==================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 114.82 |=================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 5.25 |===================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 38.23 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 4.21 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 7.38 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 13.49 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 25.60 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 4.03 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 48.47 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 7.10 |===================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 12.96 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 24.94 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 47.94 |==================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 88.40 |==================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 1853.73 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 1076.69 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 2552.79 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 65255.59 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 41747.49 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 81.28 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 160.16 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 2930.37 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 568535.52 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 47775.50 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 13354.18 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 2025.88 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 7865.13 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 3176948.18 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 323266.23 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 100.27 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better kernel test suite . 4347846.37 |=============================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 542 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 833 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 296 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 115 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 76 |======================================================= Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 107 |====================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 12741 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 16841 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 74 |======================================================= Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 10934 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 18972 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 30069 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 67 |======================================================= Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 12829 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 30048 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 39147 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 12046 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 37227 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 49557 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 70054 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 18507 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 33088 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 46144 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 36459 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 56341 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 116779 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 143445 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 43200 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 69341 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 84693 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 64448 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 91605 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 115157 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 84523 |==================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 116693 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 144640 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 142080 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 189355 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 245009 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 245845 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 354475 |=================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better kernel test suite . 449365 |===================================================