kernel_test Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 testing with a Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) and astdrmfb on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1907156-HV-KERNELTES36 kernel test suite Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 3.40GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR4-2133MT/s Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1, Disk: 480GB SMC3108 + 2000GB SMC3108, Graphics: astdrmfb
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=genericDisk Notes: DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersavePython Notes: Python 3.6.1 :: Anaconda 4.4.0 (64-bit)Security Notes: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: SMT vulnerable L1D conditional cache flushes + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline
kernel_test OpenBenchmarking.org Phoronix Test Suite Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 3.40GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads) Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS) 4 x 8192 MB DDR4-2133MT/s Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 480GB SMC3108 + 2000GB SMC3108 astdrmfb CentOS Linux 7 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64) GCC 4.8.5 20150623 xfs 1024x768 Processor Motherboard Memory Disk Graphics OS Kernel Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Kernel_test Benchmarks System Logs - --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=generic - DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - Python 3.6.1 :: Anaconda 4.4.0 (64-bit) - l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: SMT vulnerable L1D conditional cache flushes + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline
kernel_test sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertions fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size fs-mark: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads fs-mark: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size fs-mark: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync dbench: 1 dbench: 6 dbench: 12 dbench: 48 dbench: 128 dbench: 256 iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Read Performance iozone: 64Kb - 8GB - Write Performance compilebench: Compile compilebench: Initial Create compilebench: Read Compiled Tree postmark: Disk Transaction Performance mafft: Multiple Sequence Alignment compress-7zip: Compress Speed Test c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel compress-pbzip2: 256MB File Compression encode-mp3: WAV To MP3 hackbench: 1 - Thread hackbench: 2 - Thread hackbench: 4 - Thread hackbench: 8 - Thread hackbench: 1 - Process hackbench: 16 - Thread hackbench: 2 - Process hackbench: 4 - Process hackbench: 8 - Process hackbench: 16 - Process hackbench: 32 - Process openssl: RSA 4096-bit Performance stress-ng: Crypto stress-ng: Bsearch stress-ng: Forking stress-ng: Hsearch stress-ng: Lsearch stress-ng: Tsearch stress-ng: CPU Stress stress-ng: Semaphores stress-ng: Matrix Math stress-ng: Vector Math stress-ng: Memory Copying stress-ng: Socket Activity stress-ng: Context Switching stress-ng: Glibc C String Functions stress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting stress-ng: System V Message Passing schbench: 2 - 2 schbench: 2 - 4 schbench: 2 - 6 schbench: 2 - 8 schbench: 4 - 2 schbench: 4 - 4 schbench: 4 - 6 schbench: 4 - 8 schbench: 6 - 2 schbench: 6 - 4 schbench: 6 - 6 schbench: 6 - 8 schbench: 8 - 2 schbench: 8 - 4 schbench: 8 - 6 schbench: 8 - 8 schbench: 16 - 2 schbench: 16 - 4 schbench: 16 - 6 schbench: 16 - 8 schbench: 2 - 16 schbench: 2 - 24 schbench: 2 - 32 schbench: 32 - 2 schbench: 32 - 4 schbench: 32 - 6 schbench: 32 - 8 schbench: 4 - 16 schbench: 4 - 24 schbench: 4 - 32 schbench: 6 - 16 schbench: 6 - 24 schbench: 6 - 32 schbench: 8 - 16 schbench: 8 - 24 schbench: 8 - 32 schbench: 16 - 16 schbench: 16 - 24 schbench: 16 - 32 schbench: 32 - 16 schbench: 32 - 24 schbench: 32 - 32 kernel test suite 5.13 273.97 422.37 367.03 1764.40 374.75 3789.59 6596.93 6555.56 5946.95 5751.55 5891.72 4010.33 491.88 461.44 6132.83 493.59 1672.85 236.79 521.59 3554 3.84 36265 114.82 5.25 38.23 4.21 7.38 13.49 25.60 4.03 48.47 7.10 12.96 24.94 47.94 88.40 1853.73 1076.69 2552.79 65255.59 41747.49 81.28 160.16 2930.37 568535.52 47775.50 13354.18 2025.88 7865.13 3176948.18 323266.23 100.27 4347846.37 542 833 296 115 76 107 12741 16841 74 10934 18972 30069 67 12829 30048 39147 12046 37227 49557 70054 18507 33088 46144 36459 56341 116779 143445 43200 69341 84693 64448 91605 115157 84523 116693 144640 142080 189355 245009 245845 354475 449365 OpenBenchmarking.org
SQLite This is a simple benchmark of SQLite. At present this test profile just measures the time to perform a pre-defined number of insertions on an indexed database. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better SQLite 3.22 Timed SQLite Insertions kernel test suite 1.1543 2.3086 3.4629 4.6172 5.7715 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 5.13 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lz -ldl -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads kernel test suite 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 422.37 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size kernel test suite 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 34.83, N = 15 367.03 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync kernel test suite 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 8.14, N = 3 1764.40 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 6 kernel test suite 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 17.97, N = 3 3789.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 12 kernel test suite 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 15.86, N = 3 6596.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 48 kernel test suite 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 44.60, N = 3 6555.56 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 128 kernel test suite 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 55.33, N = 3 5946.95 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 Client Count: 256 kernel test suite 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 7.41, N = 3 5751.55 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance kernel test suite 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 30.49, N = 3 4010.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance kernel test suite 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 3.14, N = 3 491.88 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance kernel test suite 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 5.09, N = 15 461.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance kernel test suite 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 105.98, N = 3 6132.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance kernel test suite 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 1.32, N = 3 493.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Compile Bench Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile kernel test suite 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.53, N = 3 1672.85
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance kernel test suite 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 16.67, N = 3 3554 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
C-Ray This is a test of C-Ray, a simple raytracer designed to test the floating-point CPU performance. This test is multi-threaded (16 threads per core), will shoot 8 rays per pixel for anti-aliasing, and will generate a 1600 x 1200 image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel kernel test suite 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 114.82
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process kernel test suite 0.9068 1.8136 2.7204 3.6272 4.534 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 4.03
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 kernel test suite 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 424.44, N = 12 833
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 kernel test suite 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 164.65, N = 15 296
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 kernel test suite 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 29.40, N = 13 115
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 kernel test suite 20 40 60 80 100 76
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 kernel test suite 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 30.75, N = 15 107
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 kernel test suite 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 108.25, N = 3 12741
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 kernel test suite 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 329.72, N = 15 16841
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 kernel test suite 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.11, N = 4 74
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 kernel test suite 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 274.05, N = 15 10934
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 kernel test suite 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 446.47, N = 12 18972
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 kernel test suite 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 21.33, N = 3 30069
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 kernel test suite 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 67
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 kernel test suite 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 158.59, N = 5 12829
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 kernel test suite 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K 30048
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 kernel test suite 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 524.30, N = 3 39147
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 kernel test suite 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 187.33, N = 15 12046
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 kernel test suite 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 298.67, N = 3 37227
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 kernel test suite 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 307.67, N = 3 49557
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 kernel test suite 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 877.74, N = 15 70054
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 kernel test suite 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 277.33, N = 3 18507
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 kernel test suite 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 195.52, N = 3 33088
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 kernel test suite 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 369.50, N = 3 46144
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 kernel test suite 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 112.89, N = 3 36459
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 kernel test suite 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 237.56, N = 3 56341
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 kernel test suite 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1128.85, N = 3 116779
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 kernel test suite 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1628.06, N = 3 143445
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 kernel test suite 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 484.60, N = 3 43200
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 kernel test suite 15K 30K 45K 60K 75K SE +/- 603.12, N = 11 69341
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 kernel test suite 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 615.35, N = 3 84693
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 kernel test suite 14K 28K 42K 56K 70K SE +/- 461.51, N = 3 64448
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 kernel test suite 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 814.03, N = 3 91605
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 kernel test suite 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1006.07, N = 3 115157
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 kernel test suite 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 371.96, N = 3 84523
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 kernel test suite 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 840.44, N = 3 116693
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 kernel test suite 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1564.19, N = 3 144640
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 kernel test suite 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1938.40, N = 3 142080
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 kernel test suite 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 1038.12, N = 3 189355
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 kernel test suite 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 2703.31, N = 15 245009
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 kernel test suite 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 2746.62, N = 3 245845
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 kernel test suite 80K 160K 240K 320K 400K SE +/- 2238.27, N = 3 354475
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 kernel test suite 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 3612.33, N = 3 449365
kernel test suite Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 @ 3.40GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X10DRL-C v1.01 (3.1 BIOS), Memory: 4 x 8192 MB DDR4-2133MT/s Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1, Disk: 480GB SMC3108 + 2000GB SMC3108, Graphics: astdrmfb
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --disable-libgcj --disable-libunwind-exceptions --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-gnu-indirect-function --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-initfini-array --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran,ada,go,lto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-arch_32=x86-64 --with-linker-hash-style=gnu --with-tune=genericDisk Notes: DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rwProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersavePython Notes: Python 3.6.1 :: Anaconda 4.4.0 (64-bit)Security Notes: l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: SMT vulnerable L1D conditional cache flushes + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of Load fences __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full retpoline
Testing initiated at 12 July 2019 16:46 by user root.