intel-core-i5-6200u-280ghz, "hdparm Timed Disk Reads - Disk To Read: /dev/sda", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",520.25,525.26,524.47,527.19,525.4 "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1845.133527,1811.128073,1865.237918 "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: FLOAT", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",282003205.28843,280770878.59406,281479236.1007 "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: DOUBLE", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",655662309.57778,652309267.10843,653687942.64592 "Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 - Pfam Database Search", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",19.475633859634,19.150593042374,19.099376916885 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-HPL", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",20.1856,20.13,20.1292 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ffte", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3.1737,3.25135,3.22113 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ffte", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3.1737,3.25135,3.22113 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: EP-DGEMM", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",5.22812,5.22933,5.22299 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Ptrans", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.317831,0.314416,0.317195 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",4.72391,4.72191,4.71722 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: G-Random Access", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.0020573,0.00203341,0.00203473 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Random Ring Latency", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.660876,0.66821,0.662149 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2.71475,2.70762,2.68115 "HPC Challenge 1.5.0 - Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",7413.764,7787.237,7453.787 "High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1.08837,1.08876,1.0884 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",252,243,243 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Read", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",43,58,48,56,36,45 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: X", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.3,0.2,0.2,0.3,0.2,0.3 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: X", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",16.8,16.9,16.8 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Video", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",30,44,36,34,44,17 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",132,102,78,72,54,75 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: X", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",480,360,454,368,432,581 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: X - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",3,34,4,36,7,5 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,0.5,13.8,12,0.2,0.5 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Read", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,2,0.3,0.1,0.9,0.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",49.6,46.3,49,47.9 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Read", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",16.7,16.7,1.5,0.5,0.3,0.2 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Video", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,0.2,0.2 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",218.5,138.6,117.1,50.1,109.3,110.5 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Burn", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",95.9,112.7,100,96,96,99.9 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",142.9,109,41.9,145.3,81.9,213.9 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Write", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",42.7,65.7,66.3,30.4,45.4,56.7 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",124.7,128.4,129.2 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Audio - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.2,1.1,0.5,1,0.2,1.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",140.4,155.9,136.9,83.3,138.5,201.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Video - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.5,0.2,0.3,1.1,0.1,0.1 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",232,230.8,363.4,270.9,269.1,241.6 "Interbench 0.31 - Benchmark: Gaming - Background Load: Memload", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6821.8486328125,7085.966796875,6891.7470703125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6226.9951171875,6086.109375,6450.5751953125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6873.958984375,7167.0908203125,6922.361328125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3519.208984375,3353.3642578125,3309.0908203125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3687.345703125,3658.7294921875,3686.1181640625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3781.255859375,3701.2431640625,3696.0263671875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",243.8232421875,260.3779296875,266.1669921875,259.2685546875,241.0810546875,259.1513671875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",272.892578125,271.3203125,249.240234375,261.4521484375,256.740234375,275.9873046875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",285.619140625,286.07421875,284.0322265625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",258.2978515625,257.556640625,249.875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",270.9775390625,272.8154296875,269.916015625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",280.8330078125,279.283203125,279.779296875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6237.5087890625,6183.8173828125,6203.2255859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",6470.599609375,6826.7900390625,6367.6240234375,6444.5380859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",7099.3466796875,7277.82421875,7225.896484375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",4116.123046875,3971.9755859375,4140.2470703125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",2798.8525390625,2818.59375,2787.8173828125 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",247.611328125,266.5146484375,265.455078125,264.7880859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",278.8603515625,277.4501953125,277.7265625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",285.470703125,285.8955078125,284.779296875 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",223.1875,237.537109375,242.87109375,230.9755859375,234.3994140625 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",233.1708984375,223.857421875,235.6162109375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",3973.4228515625,4974.1025390625,3929.15625,4262.08203125,4159.6552734375,5044.0859375 "IOzone 3.465 - Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",212.619140625,171.310546875,170.595703125,235.85546875,209.5791015625,235.6982421875 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: Text Rendering", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",12170.211175456,11084.599555685,11413.610230697,12099.472203902,11745.023662329,11233.516682884,11939.11246884,11963.791421534 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: Image Rendering", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1551878.203946,1551475.3788281,1556281.069358,1561844.9175858 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1062693.8030857,1018696.1479846,1029137.0258821,1059682.3272726 "Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0 - Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",888523.87042108,887831.95484916,902580.96794317,901681.82930768 "Java Gradle Build 1.0 - Gradle Build: Reactor", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",30.728,30.56,31.14,30.624 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1698.3423260886,1700.7404348674,1706.9742150938,1727.4292126038 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",680.01382304879,686.75527583979,686.53568848974,683.04191296804 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1050.7473191648,1069.1024418526,1050.1147657914,1110.2741325497 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1577.2803280594,1589.2330889949,1589.7149318862,1592.6123669221 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",4173.7356655656,4145.2245564321,4196.183625954,4241.812219185 "Java SciMark 2.0 - Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1009.9344946044,1013.3868112176,1012.3220633478,1009.4054313942 "John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2500,2500,2503 "John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Traditional DES", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",9646000,9614000,9601000 "John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",80419,80321,80342 "JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",2210715.7,2210773.5,2212050.2 "JuliaGPU 1.2pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",2211798.6,2210672.9,2210521.7 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",268964.056958,286971.492325,271484.915583,283146.829434,289421.561528,277536.465545 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",156122.75904,155102.40113,157287.986789,156353.474639,145961.733051,160035.522145 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",244550.47938,266886.587754,257760.814249,272110.378341,255355.46508,230420.232962,272070.407174,263867.037124,267225.917345,277148.831843,231114.663566,244918.160286 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",90182.425544,106593.88019,89649.861382,95194.813874,93902.98716,86380.923809,101510.730887,91194.929317,100254.004458,94175.573762,111441.133038,90264.878756 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18964.224953,18429.53992,18968.053804,18758.93223,18890.75182,20549.934647,19342.789359,22795.782392,22457.100224,19496.410981,18823.986028,16922.645066 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",113628.670776,116389.066512,115427.713141,107062.883353,114424.410541,106168.178774,101924.648085,113054.116292,113962.699235,114465.005497,106305.855884,109300.068095 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",81559.22039,78513.987287,84320.338053,83286.710678,87354.045948,83128.478436,85306.797734 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",57056.646518,53605.635867,51360.268941,54911.180773,54761.792786,52977.893682,55943.817155 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",15258.888453,14720.588824,15224.09672,15132.669983,15362.429736,15344.548462 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Simple Blit - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8828.080738,8023.920366,12593.899014,7054.771472,7889.644575,9352.596813,9386.222658,6666.704654,9332.565842,10117.080733,8639.510948,9067.405017 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text LCD - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",32900.415108,30960.795744,29974.559241,34347.452745,34980.185516,32157.801468,33162.660843,31105.966537,33324.594366,32820.162392,32029.418524,32554.648654 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",11605.887108,11516.698625,11455.09932,11283.8354,11518.168243,11620.400258 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8580.484949,7973.083774,8933.27866,8287.615268,8646.351597,9356.393536,8203.287399,8130.157102,8784.05856,8319.051012,8336.4302,8493.079342 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4902.361304,5516.693952,4930.676296,5550.783057,5455.962588,5489.533091,5579.923919,5178.920691,5694.121421,5466.524729,5298.942843,5650.149619 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",44388.972209,41858.670948,42870.518257,45211.080446,45566.275758,47036.210591,47220.688777,45812.896979,45235.126111,46869.894954,46417.668336,45762.080326 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",145255.677086,160112.969802,149750.868819,153984.21451,159371.015725,154414.091341,157884.364044 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Put Composition - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",3661.709125,3669.231286,2525.71545,3672.3452,3134.333257,3724.073298,3450.108923,3268.422015,3468.852396,3019.456837,3237.595132,3326.376207 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",36418.412387,35016.952099,34333.257271,36755.886623,31344.245015,33030.15797,33558.496037,36575.071316,35751.811838,35283.075895,38165.764739,36661.677457 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18247.836836,19245.686186,18534.282619,17925.342776,16162.844868,15911.436575,17568.498238,18494.307749,18292.006435,18097.414655,17604.126907,17586.844439 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8775.502161,10549.19665,11079.812207,10731.722064,9282.149354,10917.197258,11271.91323,8694.503753,8730.041143,9311.124214,9110.271215,10766.806723 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",101849.936303,109652.220883,109652.388193,114753.917579,113728.528734,110489.52405,109816.478098,113207.182481,110434.533434 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",83322.127668,85627.59751,84374.937101,82241.000732,79084.150936,80676.941939 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",50988.803728,55858.325687,48788.224099,56223.993866,51874.029034,53379.478827,50410.561266,52760.359489,56848.793157,55683.939205,51875.995223,56228.59589 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14971.254759,14865.51891,13967.460422,15281.473015,15970.476887,15759.611058,15014.152248,15325.382059,15490.03089,15949.661884,15238.319608,15127.168517 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18091.485352,18364.261726,18198.237932,18475.594662,17288.955338,17252.596864 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",18457.830783,17152.768172,16997.629249,18397.194097,17067.644838,17758.65204,17808.604368 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Rects Composition - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4986.400725,6159.702656,4846.102094,8004.117874,4781.009696,5041.353034,6536.88329,4792.646898,5171.074447,6281.107383,5078.750869,4586.227828 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: 12pt Text Grayscale - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",31681.168721,31972.454501,33103.17452,31818.458974,32082.544033,31171.849869 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14584.750246,14823.162275,14225.661869,13713.897528,13939.944925,13142.001256,14176.334882,14289.821048,14459.030942,14693.494262,13745.951781,14279.407301 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",9241.148058,8576.926226,8861.795501,8176.425071,9684.988268,8045.344043,8825.877732,9277.827975,8357.839344,8810.765791,9273.989442,9638.054771 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",3651.690849,3100.694625,2903.647963,3150.587706,3032.914581,3282.634862,3397.726936,3508.77193,3411.777774,2784.268881,3399.079352,2889.348648 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16370.210593,16367.513954,15994.668444,15864.482533,17432.345395,17123.586677,15938.284633,17522.293749,16934.758717,16711.264746,17579.29792,17052.560603 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",11129.899301,9250.837721,10328.580856,11870.008927,11160.318866,10658.897515,9722.965927,11695.906433,9636.042358,11391.292591,10724.215543,10082.179864 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",3681.21707,4290.982233,4483.021747,3550.191798,3990.53197,4121.603272,3885.772096,3703.178024,3940.663572,4489.550729,4278.659782,4024.367149 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16878.6402,17135.111092,17175.452234,16927.630029,16367.659501,17224.576054 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",12659.626525,11773.553945,11662.084005,11898.386773,11908.755451,12751.601098,11795.862665,11235.478674,12244.695618,11924.78446,12200.01486,12132.273996 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5187.984372,5076.577426,5177.948842,4794.922212,4794.114571,4832.620186,5109.157302,5817.7117,5207.431997,6852.368995,4665.278383,4517.009363 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",201036.771474,206608.007428,208702.915556,206267.559518,204268.51251,203777.762264 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Gradient+Temp Texture - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2319.41223,1995.784902,2198.65819,2116.449768,2186.927306,2032.421578,2324.702874,2367.777961,1997.326997,2059.363821,2804.049958,2197.277887 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Linear Gradient Blend - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1760.208538,1704.976004,1713.556133,1920.183946,2454.535312,1523.14979,1740.341107,1760.617444,1744.939141,1725.790988,2155.023553,1741.525252 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Radial Gradient Paint - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2200.842608,2357.019797,2311.182127,2122.597706,2585.020777,2330.635565,2262.525559,2259.104739,2196.193265,2572.696375,2649.163267,2322.053676 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",46790.721387,47027.627315,45751.01116,48347.931662,46159.539384,47137.871764 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",198365.101043,199041.794882,178894.272491,186582.21145,187608.381503,200172.171628,174764.724111,197941.724394,197674.162984,187225.959917,197003.315799,213110.238931 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",60120.11563,55890.052356,50314.058747,53065.767228,50056.181812,65359.843181,49030.575922,59006.347122,55295.327316,51988.980404,53354.196051,57892.399442 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",12442.641991,15866.383594,12514.669209,12329.931973,18158.645231,17871.509022,20520.404862,13780.809342,11939.632326,11234.862118,21033.449671,17390.668422 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 32x32", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",51229.660846,46294.351249,47434.885556,50219.258725,50096.106321,50141.855726,49583.145803,50532.757773 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",43073.128397,40501.123006,44651.162791,40026.048698,44692.155433,40817.198786,42059.463379,43460.380648,43064.141881,42364.961685,40576.648232,44553.359217 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24585.211693,29100.442405,28000.123621,23690.832834,26211.839061,24468.506705,23992.840315,24522.260622,25209.38422,25440.182098,28300.609343,27701.223641 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",8714.320341,9737.396502,8090.186975,9925.527717,9432.437425,8710.305217,9733.309999,8904.750761,8715.971492,8025.356062,7875.810373,8455.514828 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Linear - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",7563.084846,191777.387816,8492.569002,7718.117866,11829.566039,6357.368237,161827.332559,6407.717775,207024.557396,5306.108742,8421.841563,206571.505521 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 128x128", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",45520.388209,49243.761996,48451.489051,46336.905534,46810.039522,45214.953271 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 256x256", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",19376.03047,19043.383863,20793.665186,17953.912383,19136.781285,18073.544008,16526.056679,17891.946203,19184.18522,18539.597966,17213.22382,19723.953695 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 512x512", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",9845.673518,9086.677809,8730.407049,8438.438438,9604.360899,9034.299146,9637.043402,10575.064727,9939.825646,9727.729877,9728.096677,10607.979734 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Blit Bilinear - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5673.555129,5260.300884,5497.722009,4343.779088,4809.215589,4884.55765,5388.872706,5348.615091,4519.572581,5350.469174,4573.90467,4170.785671 "JXRenderMark 1.0.1 - Test: Transformed Texture Paint - Size: 1024x1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5388.180765,6250.490363,4827.095038,4899.803421,5223.573271,5171.000843,5235.263702,6099.055191,6143.211165,5193.243317,5893.03584,4968.791523 "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 1.0 - Test: Rhodopsin Protein", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",44.6592,44.3701,44.3467 "LLVM Test Suite 6.0.0 - Time To Run", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",294.11,293.5,293 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Composite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",922.89,915.97,916.54 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Monte Carlo", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",348.57,348.01,344.77 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Fast Fourier Transform", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",212.92,213.17,214.63 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",891.14,887.65,881.84 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2117.72,2087.02,2105.29 "LuaJIT 2.1-git - Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1044.09,1043.98,1036.15 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",289,289,285 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",379,375,378 "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "lzbench 2017-08-08 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",733,733,738 "m-queens 1.2 - Time To Solve", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",547.34645414352,547.2118999958,547.36770391464 "Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 - Multiple Sequence Alignment", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",9.7656960487366,9.7998239994049,9.6041359901428 "MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",602937.7,601952,602024 "MandelbulbGPU 1.0pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",601902.4,601582.9,602551.5 "MandelGPU 1.3pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1649292,1650897.9,1650348.6 "MandelGPU 1.3pts1 - OpenCL Device: CPU+GPU", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1649053.4,1652595.8,1650099.3 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",11189.476,11177.975,11357.617 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",10703.981,10709.865,10741.99 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",11658.569,9789.766,10273.341,9908.727,9961.142,9973.981 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",10408.695,11561.822,11476.128,11559.394,11548.017,9474.914 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6672.077,6670.961,6575.703 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6572.801,6603.812,6605.406 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6495.13,6502.226,6514.631 "MBW 2018-09-08 - Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",6464.284,6682.806,6737.569 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Add", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",51684.5,51183.8,50785.2 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Get", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",78838.4,79455,79574.6 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Set", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",51386.7,50960.8,51568 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Append", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54472.2,54274.2,53152.1 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Delete", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",80534.1,79225.8,79220.1 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Prepend", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54533.1,54189.4,54425.4 "Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 - Method: Replace", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54679.7,51460.3,53724.6 "Mencoder 1.3.0 - AVI To LAVC", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",25.678578853607,25.498944044113,25.49433016777 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Graceful", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",78.55506,78.896428,78.149474 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Solitaire", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",102.761598,103.163671,102.528214 "Minion 1.8 - Benchmark: Quasigroup", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",175.81404,173.937482,173.784745 "Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.18,5.35,5.36 "Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Double Precision", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.81,5.82,5.82 "Mixbench 2016-06-06 - Benchmark: Single Precision", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",0.12,0.12,0.12 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",37.9492,37.365,36.9466 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",435.241,444.033,433.461 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",22.9185,23.3079,22.919 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",21.9863,22.1408,22.4397 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",277.995,282.055,282.302 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",285.282,279.303,273.108 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",95.3003,95.4092,95.5394 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",16761.3,16774.3,16769.1 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",34.5049,34.8229,34.7038 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",35.8517,36.234,36.176 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2248.52,2251.54,2253.2 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",13413.5,13417.4,13452.7 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",77583,77658.3,77610.6 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",79600,79464.9,79532.7 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",93478,93499.9,93684.4 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",91404.3,91179,91212.7 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",931.057,932.088,930.215 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",39190.4,39186.4,39199.9 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",63683.1,63732.1,63684 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3164.32,3143.37,3147.09 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",38995.3,39017.1,38931.3 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",63903.6,63919.7,63894.6 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",111949,112122,112076 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2887.17,2894.67,2893.42 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1856.7,1863.27,1849.49 "MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 - Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1612.7,1609.31,1606.54 "GNU MPC 1.1.0 - Multi-Precision Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",6430,6440,6470 "Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.1.2 - Primate Phylogeny Analysis", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",576.69721484184,576.15086984634,576.32967305183 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",9.77,9.567,9.257 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",91.478,88.672,91.021 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",92.157,91.488,91.245 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",98.927,100.2,100.4 "Multichase Pointer Chaser - Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",182.5,190.3,190.8 "N-Queens 1.0 - Elapsed Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",96.945,96.616,96.649 "NAMD 2.13b1 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",10.4831,10.4565,10.4471 "Open FMM Nero2D 2.0.2 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",240.23739600182,243.01569199562,240.2276160717 "Loopback TCP Network Performance - Time To Transfer 10GB Via Loopback", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",12.390553951263,12.435307979584,12.356047153473 "NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 - Static Web Page Serving", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",22395.21,22295.83,22383.68 "Node.js Octane Benchmark - ", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",27201,27325,26925 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: BT.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",2115.64,2098.81,2067.55 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",128.32,127.52,127.53 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: FT.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3799.86,3817.31,3784.2 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: FT.B", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",3859.85,3818.47,3831.93 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: LU.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",6906.75,6921.2,6949.97 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: LU.C", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",5889.6,5891.52,5897.07 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 - Test / Class: SP.A", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",1868.06,1835.07,1864.26 "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 2018-11-09 - Time To Completion", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",960.43897414207,964.66334915161,957.957873106 "Numpy Benchmark - ", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U", "Nuttcp 8.1.4 - Test: 10G+ UDP - Server Address: 5.20.0.41", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",178.3482,177.2694,156.7633,164.5548,157.9952,161.4935 "Nuttcp 8.1.4 - Test: TCP Transfer - Default - Server Address: 5.20.0.41", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Connection I219-V",139.2082,127.1391,122.0953,120.9655,135.3057,119.5694 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",178.2,178.9,179.5 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",126.2,126.2,126.3 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",49.1,49,49.1 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",197.4,195.2,198.4 "OpenArena 0.8.8 - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel HD 520", "OpenSSL 1.1.1 - RSA 4096-bit Performance", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",411.1,410.6,411.2 "Optcarrot - Optimized Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",83.408574047633,82.48401529172,82.836541113969,82.251358590524 "OSBench - Test: Create Files", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",20.311365,20.311674,20.666922 "OSBench - Test: Create Threads", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",19.01865,19.030571,20.22028,18.968582 "OSBench - Test: Launch Programs", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",118.200779,119.140148,118.560791 "OSBench - Test: Create Processes", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",35.040379,34.69944,35.009384 "OSBench - Test: Memory Allocations", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",106.440067,106.636047,106.726885 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.02,5.05,5.03 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",503.747,506.181,503.839 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.04,5.04,4.98 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",505.416,504.852,499.36 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5,5,4.99 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",501.046,501.45,500.523 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.99,4.98,4.99 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",500.054,499.284,500.45 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.95,4.95,4.95 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",496.06,495.933,495.916 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",5.02,4.99,5.01 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",503.06,500.237,502.579 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.96,4.87,4.96 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",497.011,488.452,497.488 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.97,4.98,4.97 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",498.091,499.623,498.497 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.96,4.94,4.95 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",497.009,495.384,495.9 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.94,4.94,4.94 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",495.626,494.939,495.104 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.91,4.92,4.91 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",491.931,492.89,492.575 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.91,4.9,4.91 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",491.79,491.261,492.179 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.89,4.89,4.9 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",490.727,490.555,491.109 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.88,4.88,4.89 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",488.746,489.443,490.092 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",4.88,4.89,4.88 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",489.402,489.803,489.416 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",36.65,36.82,36.56 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",586.329,589.144,585.038 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",31.01,30.83,30.47 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",323.159,321.256,317.561 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",38.07,37.68,38.12 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",609.123,602.911,609.918 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",28.84,28.55,28.42 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",461.499,456.772,454.723 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",27.05,27.18,27.08 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",432.84,434.844,433.291 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",22.82,23.07,22.94 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",365.096,369.161,366.984 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",28.15,28.33,28.34 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",450.389,453.204,453.484 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24.31,24.19,24.19 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",388.991,386.996,386.987 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",26.7,26.88,26.7 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",427.227,430.098,427.134 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24.1,23.99,24.34 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",385.6,383.866,389.493 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",24.11,24.12,23.86 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",385.76,385.886,381.715 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",32.22,32.07,32.19 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 576", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",335.75,334.224,335.499 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.66,20.66,20.58 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",215.33,215.315,214.474 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",19.5,19.51,19.5 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 800", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",203.237,203.32,203.245 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",15.73,15.71,15.73 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 960", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",163.921,163.666,163.889 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.57,20.58,20.5 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1368 x 768", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",214.384,214.489,213.67 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16.85,16.88,16.8 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",175.618,175.871,175.111 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",19.14,19.09,19.12 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 810", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",199.416,198.988,199.244 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16.82,16.78,16.82 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1440 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",175.289,174.907,175.284 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",16.81,16.83,16.75 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 900", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",175.156,175.343,174.521 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",21.65,21.56,21.66 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",346.39,344.908,346.559 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",21.38,21.31,21.4 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",342.128,340.901,342.459 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.91,20.78,21.11 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",334.529,332.514,337.751 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",21.01,21.04,20.92 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",336.147,336.593,334.681 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",20.95,21,20.97 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",335.231,336.041,335.56 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.65,14.64,14.62 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",152.658,152.526,152.399 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.59,14.57,14.58 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1400 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",152.048,151.789,151.903 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.46,14.43,14.45 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1600 x 1024", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",150.68,150.416,150.629 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.46,14.43,14.42 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1680 x 1050", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",150.682,150.388,150.251 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",14.45,14.43,14.42 "ParaView 5.4.1 - Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",150.587,150.364,150.326 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP LBM", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",180.235199,180.916519,183.489609 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP CUTCP", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",23.061838,23.120825,23.056009 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP Stencil", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",33.302898,33.56572,33.765694 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",30.982107,31.260078,29.968834 "Perl Benchmarks - Test: Pod2html", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.17377966326531,0.17088802327806,0.17054457748724 "Perl Benchmarks - Test: Interpreter", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",0.0013819701939381,0.0013887570759905,0.001379461266885 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",54825.841791,54816.90677,56385.248716 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",312.916493,312.159832,313.268657 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",20742.017915,20621.340088,21309.266323 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.072492,0.072556,0.072654 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",91.629999,92.313919,91.129299 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",37795.666394,37978.512049,38407.465845 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.038559,0.038447,0.038644 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",873.554333,871.967909,864.761626 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.008164,0.008175,0.008167 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",51015.735069,51418.583318,50735.778643 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",14418.803934,14387.23952,14477.062565 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",308.939305,310.194633,308.715891 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",131.31666,136.216115,160.236058,143.799428,159.718919,162.332814 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.073175,0.073753,0.07267 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",35130.561062,35103.861499,34805.911254 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.037992,0.039396,0.038013 "PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 - Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1228.398604,1291.586398,1094.242625,1128.747692,1126.765597,1269.09191 "PHP Micro Benchmarks - Test: Zend bench", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",0.584,0.589,0.589 "PHP Micro Benchmarks - Test: Zend micro_bench", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",2.942,2.954,2.905 "PHPBench 0.8.1 - PHP Benchmark Suite", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",446171,446395,443023 "Pjdfstest - ", Lower Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256", "PolyBench-C 4.2 - Test: Covariance Computation", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",8.4107360839844,8.2218561172485,8.2849540710449 "PolyBench-C 4.2 - Test: Correlation Computation", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",8.2719719409943,8.2332730293274,8.1882410049438 "PolyBench-C 4.2 - Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",5.7287502288818,5.7836220264435,5.69602394104 "PostMark 1.51 - Disk Transaction Performance", Higher Results Are Better "SAMSUNG MZNLN256",4237,4166,4166 "POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 - Trace Time", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",299.777,298.648,299.08 "Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U",151.154,152.868,152.772 "PyBench 2018-02-16 - Total For Average Test Times", Lower Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",1519,1531,1512 "QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",532.99315789474,532.72057894737,530.65105263158 "QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",598.68373684211,602.92715789474,620.32373684211 "QGears2 - Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",2380.6641842105,2407.0598684211,2381.5008421053 "QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",293.56618421053,296.33026315789,291.283 "QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",179.42839473684,179.50373684211,179.19321052632 "QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",280.31257894737,280.36376315789,279.78702631579 "QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",186.56668421053,186.34236842105,186.58194736842 "QGears2 - Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1322.1985789474,1332.2109736842,1328.8572105263 "QGears2 - Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling", Higher Results Are Better "Intel HD 520",1635.8981578947,1631.3460263158,1650.2104736842 "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Fib10", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Canvas Text Simple", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Creation Delegates Flow", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079", "Qmlbench 2 - Test: Moving Images Animations", Higher Results Are Better "Intel Core i5-6200U - Intel HD 520 3072MB - HP 8079",