loongson1

ARMv8 rev 4 testing with a Qualcomm MSM8998 MSM 8998 v2.1 MTP and mdssfb_90000 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1905237-HV-1905236HV72
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Chess Test Suite 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 5 Tests
CPU Massive 6 Tests
Creator Workloads 2 Tests
Fortran Tests 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Multi-Core 4 Tests
Raytracing 2 Tests
Renderers 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 3 Tests
Single-Threaded 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Loongson-3B R2
May 22 2019
  7 Hours, 43 Minutes
loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835
May 23 2019
  1 Hour, 22 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 33 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


loongson1 ARMv8 rev 4 testing with a Qualcomm MSM8998 MSM 8998 v2.1 MTP and mdssfb_90000 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Loongson-3B R2: Processor: Loongson-3B R2 @ 1.20GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: loongson generic, Chipset: AMD RS780 + SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WD5000AAKS-0, Graphics: AMD OLAND 1GB, Audio: Conexant CX20631, Monitor: 2243W, Network: Intel 82574L OS: Fedora 28, Kernel: 4.14.77gs-tweak-1+ (mips64), Desktop: MATE 1.20.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 18.2.2 (LLVM 6.0.1), Compiler: Clang 6.0.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835: Processor: ARMv8 rev 4 @ 2.04GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Qualcomm MSM8998 MSM 8998 v2.1 MTP, Memory: 6144MB, Disk: 58GB KLUCG4J1ED-B0C1 + 4GB KLUCG4J1ED-B0C1 + 2GB KLUCG4J1ED-B0C1, Graphics: mdssfb_90000 OS: Debian GNU/Linux 10, Kernel: 4.4.153-ElementalX-OP5-5.02 (armv8l), Display Server: X Server 1.20.3 + SurfaceFlinger, Display Driver: fbdev 0.5.0, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0 + Clang 7.0.1-8 + LLVM 7.0.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1080x3840 High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 0.06 |==== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 0.53 |====================================== GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Global Score > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 193 |=== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 2790 |====================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 1302 |========== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 4907 |====================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 2985 |============ loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 9611 |====================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 760 |== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 15432 |===================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 21.72 |=== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 228.07 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 11.39 |====== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 72.34 |===================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 7.94 |====== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 52.77 |===================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 13.53 |== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 218.83 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 23.08 |=== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 252.45 |==================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 52.68 |=== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 543.97 |==================================== FFTE 6.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 . 1237.06 |===================================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 1839463 |============= Loongson-3B R2 ................... 1809735 |============= loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 4942767 |=================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 145262 |========= loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 611575 |==================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 83.37 |===================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 13.10 |====== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 179.39 |==================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 20.67 |==== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 84.02 |===================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 13.07 |====== Sample Pi Program Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 250.63 |==================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 34.07 |===== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 63.95 |===================================== Loongson-3B R2 ................... 63.94 |===================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 10.23 |====== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 1600 |====================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 356 |======== POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Loongson-3B R2 ................... 1374 |====================================== loongson3b1500e-vs-msm8998sdm835 . 282 |========