Xen HVM domU 4.1.5 testing on Debian 9.8 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 (7 Cores), Motherboard: Xen HVM domU v4.1.5, Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 15360MB, Disk: 40GB, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446
OS: Debian 9.8, Kernel: 4.19.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 (x86_64), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: Xen HVM domU 4.1.5
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic -vDisk Notes: MQ-DEADLINE / errors=remount-ro,noatime,nobarrier,rwPython Notes: Python 2.7.13 + Python 3.5.3Security Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline STIBP: disabled RSB filling + PTE Inversion
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 1.27, N = 3 424.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 236.93 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 1.70, N = 3 881.77 1. (CC) gcc options: -static
BlogBench BlogBench is designed to replicate the load of a real-world busy file server by stressing the file-system with multiple threads of random reads, writes, and rewrites. The behavior is mimicked of that of a blog by creating blogs with content and pictures, modifying blog posts, adding comments to these blogs, and then reading the content of the blogs. All of these blogs generated are created locally with fake content and pictures. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 1528.85, N = 3 623619 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Final Score, More Is Better BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 28.29, N = 3 4405 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 18.96, N = 3 5439.51 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 14.81, N = 3 5654.71 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 17.24, N = 3 1867.44 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 24.22, N = 5 1887.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 19.74, N = 3 1926.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 4.81, N = 3 388.03 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 2.92, N = 3 471.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 2.05, N = 3 520.80 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 3.45, N = 3 317.60 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.88, N = 3 375.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.16, N = 4 413.05 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 69.67, N = 4 5098.07 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 48.40, N = 3 5244.10 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1200 2400 3600 4800 6000 SE +/- 83.67, N = 3 5489.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 72.05, N = 3 4928.82 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 9.13, N = 3 1847.31 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 5.34, N = 3 384.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 3.70, N = 3 459.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 3.87, N = 3 520.18 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.58, N = 3 360.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.76, N = 3 275.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 78.22, N = 3 4714.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.47, N = 3 361.15 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 9.24, N = 3 1984 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 0.98, N = 3 2840.35 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 4.05, N = 3 2844.42 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 9.43, N = 3 2884.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 7.36, N = 3 4515.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 9.29, N = 3 4667.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 9.39, N = 3 4613.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org MiB/s, More Is Better MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 2.98, N = 3 4597.69 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.26, N = 25 22.90 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 15.46, N = 20 42.72 1. (CXX) g++ options: --param -O3 -rdynamic -ldl -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: EP.C 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.61, N = 3 123.28 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.0.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.A 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 32.90, N = 3 3017.75 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.0.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.B 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 41.15, N = 3 3116.76 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.0.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.A 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 61.47, N = 5 4829.59 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.0.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.C 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 33.41, N = 3 4716.52 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.0.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Total Mop/s, More Is Better NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: SP.A 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 12.38, N = 3 876.37 1. (F9X) gfortran options: -O3 -march=native -pthread -lmpi_usempif08 -lmpi_mpifh -lmpi 2. Open MPI 2.0.2
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Rotate 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 30 60 90 120 150 139 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 11 22 33 44 55 48 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 10 20 30 40 50 42 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 120 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Noise-Gaussian 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.33, N = 3 36 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
OpenBenchmarking.org Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: HWB Color Space 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.67, N = 3 127 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -O2 -pthread -ljpeg -llzma -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread
C-Ray This is a test of C-Ray, a simple raytracer designed to test the floating-point CPU performance. This test is multi-threaded (16 threads per core), will shoot 8 rays per pixel for anti-aliasing, and will generate a 1600 x 1200 image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.44, N = 3 437.08 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
Smallpt Smallpt is a C++ global illumination renderer written in less than 100 lines of code. Global illumination is done via unbiased Monte Carlo path tracing and there is multi-threading support via the OpenMP library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.23, N = 3 67.74 1. (CXX) g++ options: -fopenmp -O3
FFmpeg This test uses FFmpeg for testing the system's audio/video encoding performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4 8 12 16 20 SE +/- 0.10, N = 3 13.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -lavdevice -lavfilter -lavformat -lavcodec -lswresample -lswscale -lavutil -lm -pthread -lbz2 -llzma -std=c11 -fomit-frame-pointer -fPIC -O3 -fno-math-errno -fno-signed-zeros -fno-tree-vectorize -MMD -MF -MT
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test measures the RSA 4096-bit performance of OpenSSL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 6.63, N = 12 345.98 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Caffe This is a benchmark of the Caffe deep learning framework and currently supports the AlexNet and Googlenet model. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Milli-Seconds, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2018-12-29 Build: CPU AlexNet 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 498.22, N = 3 615889 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fPIC -O2 -lcaffe -lglog -lgflags -lprotobuf -lboost_system -lboost_filesystem -lm -lleveldb -lsnappy -llmdb -lhdf5_hl -lhdf5 -lopencv_core -lopencv_highgui -lopencv_imgproc -lboost_thread -lstdc++ -lcblas -latlas
OpenBenchmarking.org Milli-Seconds, Fewer Is Better Caffe 2018-12-29 Build: CPU Googlenet 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 300K 600K 900K 1200K 1500K SE +/- 812.67, N = 3 1393220 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pthread -fPIC -O2 -lcaffe -lglog -lgflags -lprotobuf -lboost_system -lboost_filesystem -lm -lleveldb -lsnappy -llmdb -lhdf5_hl -lhdf5 -lopencv_core -lopencv_highgui -lopencv_imgproc -lboost_thread -lstdc++ -lcblas -latlas
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 1.58, N = 3 456.59 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 44.77, N = 3 7425.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 80.17, N = 3 29782.06 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.54, N = 4 115.78 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 124.56, N = 3 22668.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 5.80, N = 3 1059.86 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 10.45, N = 3 3442.27 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 83.07, N = 3 7556.83 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 191.15, N = 3 33786.63 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 28.56, N = 3 5832.87 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 0.39, N = 3 269.33 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 100 200 300 400 500 SE +/- 2.56, N = 3 446.72 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 170 340 510 680 850 SE +/- 4.21, N = 3 767.79 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 189.79, N = 3 34098.77 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 293.15, N = 5 23923.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 16.67, N = 3 1014.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 9.22, N = 3 3648.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -lcrypt -ldl -lm
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 0.1193 0.2386 0.3579 0.4772 0.5965 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 0.53
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 10.88, N = 3 1165.84 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 123.31, N = 3 9032.39 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 16.61, N = 3 11923.65 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 21.81 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.60, N = 3 46.54 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 723.85 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 37982.94, N = 15 2157272.73 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 15.58, N = 3 14658.68 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 800 1600 2400 3200 4000 SE +/- 13.77, N = 3 3607.50 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 30.01, N = 6 2506.16 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Socket Activity 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 404.53 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Context Switching 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 100K 200K 300K 400K 500K SE +/- 12585.92, N = 15 451998.45 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc C String Functions 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1819.41, N = 3 111890.90 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 30.91 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
OpenBenchmarking.org Bogo Ops/s, More Is Better Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: System V Message Passing 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 150K 300K 450K 600K 750K SE +/- 3460.12, N = 3 683937.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lz -lcrypt -lrt -lpthread -laio -lc
PyBench This test profile reports the total time of the different average timed test results from PyBench. PyBench reports average test times for different functions such as BuiltinFunctionCalls and NestedForLoops, with this total result providing a rough estimate as to Python's average performance on a given system. This test profile runs PyBench each time for 20 rounds. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Milliseconds, Fewer Is Better PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 13.12, N = 3 2868
Git This test measures the time needed to carry out some sample Git operations on an example, static repository that happens to be a copy of the GNOME GTK tool-kit repository. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.16, N = 4 11.46 1. git version 2.20.1
4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 (7 Cores), Motherboard: Xen HVM domU v4.1.5, Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 15360MB, Disk: 40GB, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446
OS: Debian 9.8, Kernel: 4.19.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 (x86_64), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: Xen HVM domU 4.1.5
Compiler Notes: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-browser-plugin --disable-vtable-verify --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-gtk-cairo --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-java-home --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic -vDisk Notes: MQ-DEADLINE / errors=remount-ro,noatime,nobarrier,rwPython Notes: Python 2.7.13 + Python 3.5.3Security Notes: KPTI + __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline STIBP: disabled RSB filling + PTE Inversion
Testing initiated at 18 May 2019 18:07 by user biocrusoe.