interesting-rack3 Xen HVM domU 4.1.5 testing on Debian 9.8 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0: Processor: 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 (7 Cores), Motherboard: Xen HVM domU v4.1.5, Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 15360MB, Disk: 40GB, Graphics: Cirrus Logic GD 5446 OS: Debian 9.8, Kernel: 4.19.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 (x86_64), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: Xen HVM domU 4.1.5 FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 236.40 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 424.90 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 236.93 |============================================ FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 881.77 |============================================ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 623619 |============================================ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4405 |============================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5202.57 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5439.51 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5654.71 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1867.44 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1887.35 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1926.87 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 388.03 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 471.91 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 520.80 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 317.60 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 375.00 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 413.05 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5098.07 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5244.10 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5489.35 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4928.82 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1847.31 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 2GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 384.43 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 4GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 459.69 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 520.18 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 360.15 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 275.39 |============================================ IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Read Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4714.86 |=========================================== IOzone 3.465 Record Size: 64Kb - File Size: 512MB - Disk Test: Write Performance MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 361.15 |============================================ Pjdfstest Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 221 |=============================================== Pjdfstest Test Pass / Fail < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . PASS PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1984 |============================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 19376.20 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 16735.96 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 16704.55 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 17781.80 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 17531.92 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 17544.53 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 15055.82 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 15393.20 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 18205.24 |========================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 16311.06 |========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2837.42 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2840.35 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2844.42 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2884.83 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4515.59 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4667.16 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4613.78 |=========================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4597.69 |=========================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 49.78 |============================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 16.00 |============================================= Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 133291 |============================================ Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 22.90 |============================================= Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 42.72 |============================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: BT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1016.69 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 123.28 |============================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 3017.75 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: FT.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 3116.76 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4829.59 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4716.52 |=========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3.1 Test / Class: SP.A Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 876.37 |============================================ Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 4326709 |=========================================== x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 13.95 |============================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 83 |================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 139 |=============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 48 |================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 42 |================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 120 |=============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 36 |================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 127 |=============================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 441.04 |============================================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 437.08 |============================================ Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 67.74 |============================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 54.23 |============================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 13.63 |============================================= OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 345.98 |============================================ Caffe 2018-12-29 Build: CPU AlexNet Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 615889 |============================================ Caffe 2018-12-29 Build: CPU Googlenet Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1393220 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 29951.39 |========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 456.59 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 7425.87 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 29782.06 |========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 115.78 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 22668.54 |========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1059.86 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 3442.27 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 7556.83 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 33786.63 |========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 5832.87 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 269.33 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 446.72 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 767.79 |============================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 34098.77 |========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 23923.84 |========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1014.90 |=========================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 10.3 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 3648.00 |=========================================== Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 35.95 |============================================= Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 35.94 |============================================= Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 27.55 |============================================= Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 28.08 |============================================= Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 0.54 |============================================== Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 22.25 |============================================= Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 0.53 |============================================== Darktable 2.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 21.81 |============================================= GIMP 2.8.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 21.50 |============================================= GIMP 2.8.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 41.94 |============================================= GIMP 2.8.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 39.09 |============================================= GIMP 2.8.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 92.08 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 382.45 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 1165.84 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 9032.39 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 11923.65 |========================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 21.81 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 46.54 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 723.85 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2157272.73 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 14658.68 |========================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 3607.50 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2506.16 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 404.53 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 451998.45 |========================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 111890.90 |========================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 30.91 |============================================= Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 683937.00 |========================================= Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Add Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 12573.80 |========================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Get Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 19250.57 |========================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Set Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 12757.00 |========================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Append Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 13028.30 |========================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Delete Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 19328.77 |========================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Prepend Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 13091.30 |========================================== Memcached mcperf 1.5.10 Method: Replace Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 13110.87 |========================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2868 |============================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 207798046.78 |====================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: DOUBLE QUIPs > Higher Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 403592048.58 |====================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 11.46 |============================================= Systemd Total Boot Time Test: Total ms < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 15648 |============================================= Systemd Total Boot Time Test: Kernel ms < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 2220 |============================================== Systemd Total Boot Time Test: Userspace ms < Lower Is Better 4 x Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 . 13428 |=============================================