GTX 650 vs. GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 vs. GeForce GTX 1650 benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com. GTX 650: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1GB (1084/2500MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 GTX 1650: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0802 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB + 2000GB SABRENT, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 4GB (1485/4001MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 19.04, Kernel: 5.0.0-13-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.32.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 430.09, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 beignet 1.3 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.120, Vulkan: 1.1.99, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided Preset: 1920 x 1080 - High Quality Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 3.17 |===== GTX 1650 . 40.43 |============================================================= Deus Ex: Mankind Divided Preset: 1920 x 1080 - High Quality Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.03 |===== GTX 1650 . 0.35 |============================================================== Deus Ex: Mankind Divided System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 46 AVG: 99 MAX: 108 . . . |----#X GTX 1650 . MIN: 44 AVG: 115 MAX: 156 ..|------#######X############| Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 40.07 |================= GTX 1650 . 139.53 |============================================================ Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.36 |================= GTX 1650 . 1.32 |============================================================== Dota 2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 42 AVG: 111 MAX: 133 |----------#########X| GTX 1650 . MIN: 49 AVG: 105 MAX: 166 |-----###X################--| Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 43.03 |================== GTX 1650 . 140.37 |============================================================ Dota 2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Renderer: Vulkan Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.46 |====================== GTX 1650 . 1.31 |============================================================== Dota 2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 42 AVG: 93 MAX: 119 |-----------###X---| GTX 1650 . MIN: 50 AVG: 108 MAX: 153 |-------#X################| F1 2018 Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High Quality Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 39 |=========== GTX 1650 . 224 |=============================================================== F1 2018 Configuration: 1920 x 1080 - High Quality Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 . 0.46 |=============================================================== F1 2018 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 43 AVG: 85 MAX: 177 .|---########X| . GTX 1650 . MIN: 39 AVG: 134 MAX: 172 |--------##################X| GLmark2 276 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Score > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 1594 |=========================================== GTX 1650 . 2316 |============================================================== GLmark2 276 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Score Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 15.50 |=========================================== GTX 1650 . 22.11 |============================================================= GLmark2 276 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 48 AVG: 103 MAX: 118 .|---------------#X---| GTX 1650 . MIN: 56 AVG: 105 MAX: 127 . X#------| HITMAN Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 4.92 |===== GTX 1650 . 65.09 |============================================================= HITMAN Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality Level: Medium - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 10 AVG: 202 MAX: 885 .. ..|--#X#-|... . GTX 1650 . MIN: 4 AVG: 15 MAX: 89 |X . HITMAN System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 52 AVG: 107 MAX: 119 . . .|-----X . GTX 1650 . MIN: 41 AVG: 144 MAX: 169 .|------------------------#X#| Mad Max Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Camp Hollow Point Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 23.54 |=============== GTX 1650 . 97.37 |============================================================= Mad Max Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Stronghold Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 22.74 |=============== GTX 1650 . 90.58 |============================================================= Mad Max Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Hope, Glory, and Dog is Dead Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 23.02 |=============== GTX 1650 . 94.07 |============================================================= Mad Max Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Landmover Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 29.17 |================ GTX 1650 . 108.83 |============================================================ Mad Max Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Default - Renderer: Vulkan - Scene: Landmover Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.35 |========================= GTX 1650 . 0.87 |============================================================== Mad Max System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 50 AVG: 83 MAX: 107 . X---|.. GTX 1650 . MIN: 40 AVG: 126 MAX: 145 .|--------------------####X-| Meta Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt Performance Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 46.78 |==================== GTX 1650 . 143.51 |============================================================ NAMD CUDA 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. 7.73941 |=========================================================== GTX 1650 . 0.37435 |=== NAMD CUDA 2.13 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 47 AVG: 169 MAX: 173 . . |-----X GTX 1650 . MIN: 39 AVG: 151 MAX: 204 |--------------------##########X| OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 128 |================ GTX 1650 . 510 |=============================================================== OpenArena 0.8.8 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 1.0 AVG: 7.8 MAX: 14.0 GTX 1650 . MIN: 1.0 AVG: 2.0 MAX: 12.0 OpenArena 0.8.8 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 41 AVG: 97 MAX: 104 |-----------------#X GTX 1650 . MIN: 39 AVG: 89 MAX: 132 |--------###X##############| ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 4.53 |================= GTX 1650 . 16.66 |============================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 454 |================= GTX 1650 . 1670 |============================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 5.31 |================ GTX 1650 . 20.87 |============================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 41 AVG: 85 MAX: 117 .|-------------#X-------| GTX 1650 . MIN: 49 AVG: 80 MAX: 123 |--------#X-------------| ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 23.74 |============= GTX 1650 . 106.11 |============================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 247 |============== GTX 1650 . 1106 |============================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 3.33 |============ GTX 1650 . 17.13 |============================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 41 AVG: 74 MAX: 91 |------------#######X#-| GTX 1650 . MIN: 39 AVG: 65 MAX: 79 |-----###########X#| ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 82.48 |=========================== GTX 1650 . 185.11 |============================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 1320 |============================ GTX 1650 . 2962 |============================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 23.50 |========================= GTX 1650 . 58.14 |============================================================= Portal Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 165 |==================== GTX 1650 . 524 |=============================================================== Portal Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 1.72 |================= GTX 1650 . 6.33 |============================================================== Portal System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 56 AVG: 96 MAX: 119 |--############X-| GTX 1650 . MIN: 50 AVG: 83 MAX: 139 |--####X#################| System Power Consumption Monitor Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring Watts GTX 650 .. MIN: 41 AVG: 107 MAX: 178 ..|-------###X#-----------| GTX 1650 . MIN: 38 AVG: 120 MAX: 204 .|-----------#####X#----|. . . Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 126 |====================== GTX 1650 . 368 |=============================================================== Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 1.43 |========================= GTX 1650 . 3.48 |============================================================== Tesseract 2014-05-12 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 43 AVG: 88 MAX: 96 |---------------##X| GTX 1650 . MIN: 50 AVG: 106 MAX: 118 |-------------------#X| Tomb Raider Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 29.30 |================= GTX 1650 . 102.13 |============================================================ Tomb Raider Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Quality: High Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.26 |===================== GTX 1650 . 0.78 |============================================================== Tomb Raider System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 47 AVG: 112 MAX: 121 |------------------X GTX 1650 . MIN: 51 AVG: 130 MAX: 150 |-----------------------X-| Total War: WARHAMMER II 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 13.93 |============= GTX 1650 . 64.70 |============================================================= Total War: WARHAMMER II 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 4 AVG: 72 MAX: 130 .. .|-#X###|. . GTX 1650 . MIN: 5 AVG: 15 MAX: 67 ...|X|.. . . Total War: WARHAMMER II 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 49 AVG: 97 MAX: 131 . |-----####X#-| . GTX 1650 . MIN: 44 AVG: 114 MAX: 146 . |-------###############X#| Total War: WARHAMMER II 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven Battle Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 11.77 |============== GTX 1650 . 52.47 |============================================================= Total War: WARHAMMER II 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 6 AVG: 86 MAX: 157 . .|--##X##-|. . . .. GTX 1650 . MIN: 5 AVG: 19 MAX: 49 ...|X|...... Total War: WARHAMMER II 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 48 AVG: 98 MAX: 147 .|-----------##X--| . GTX 1650 . MIN: 40 AVG: 116 MAX: 146 . |--------###############X#| Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 17.30 |================ GTX 1650 . 64.81 |============================================================= Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.16 |=================== GTX 1650 . 0.53 |============================================================== Unigine Heaven 4.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 44 AVG: 110 MAX: 114 . . |-------X| GTX 1650 . MIN: 38 AVG: 123 MAX: 127 . .|-----------------------X Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 9.92 |============== GTX 1650 . 44.80 |============================================================= Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.09 |================ GTX 1650 . 0.35 |============================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 43 AVG: 109 MAX: 113 . ...|---------------X GTX 1650 . MIN: 39 AVG: 126 MAX: 132 . .|-----------------------X Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 4.83 |========= GTX 1650 . 32.70 |============================================================= Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.05 |============ GTX 1650 . 0.26 |============================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 42 AVG: 104 MAX: 107 . |-----X| GTX 1650 . MIN: 40 AVG: 126 MAX: 131 . . |---------------------X Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 20.06 |================= GTX 1650 . 70.05 |============================================================= Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 0.18 |==================== GTX 1650 . 0.56 |============================================================== Unigine Valley 1.0 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 41 AVG: 111 MAX: 116 . |------------------X GTX 1650 . MIN: 40 AVG: 126 MAX: 131 . . |---------------------X| Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 234 |================================ GTX 1650 . 455 |=============================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 2.23 |============================== GTX 1650 . 4.65 |============================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 42 AVG: 105 MAX: 114 |----------------------X| GTX 1650 . MIN: 40 AVG: 98 MAX: 121 |------------###########X#| Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 169 |=============================== GTX 1650 . 347 |=============================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second Per Watt > Higher Is Better GTX 650 .. 1.56 |============================== GTX 1650 . 3.26 |============================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 System Power Consumption Monitor Watts < Lower Is Better GTX 650 .. MIN: 42 AVG: 108 MAX: 116 |--------------------#X GTX 1650 . MIN: 39 AVG: 107 MAX: 128 |-----------------------#X#|