microsoft testing on CentOS Linux 7 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 (4 Cores), Motherboard: Nutanix AHV (1.9.1-5.el6 BIOS), Memory: 16384 MB + 8192 MB RAM, Disk: 537GB VDISK, Graphics: bochsdrmfb
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-957.12.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: microsoft
Disk Notes: DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw,seclabelPython Notes: Python 2.7.5 + Python 3.6.6Security Notes: SELinux + KPTI + Load fences __user pointer sanitization + Full retpoline + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + PTE Inversion
Flexible IO Tester Fio is an advanced disk benchmark that depends upon the kernel's AIO access library. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 28.33, N = 3 2389 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.53, N = 3 145 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 371.18, N = 3 37067 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 6.35, N = 12 276 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 1.67, N = 3 110 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 450.92, N = 3 28100 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 60 120 180 240 300 SE +/- 1.15, N = 3 277 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.86, N = 3 155 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 404.15, N = 3 39600 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 309 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 1.70, N = 5 117 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org IOPS, More Is Better Flexible IO Tester 3.1 Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Linux AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 353.55, N = 5 29800 1. (CC) gcc options: -rdynamic -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -include -O3 -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -lrt -laio -lm -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 160 320 480 640 800 SE +/- 7.69, N = 12 757.18
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 1.31, N = 3 234
OpenBenchmarking.org Files/s, More Is Better FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 9.25, N = 3 1291
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Dbench 4.0 1 Clients VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.48, N = 3 151.00 1. (CC) gcc options: -lpopt -O2
Compile Bench Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 7.75, N = 3 890
PostMark This is a test of NetApp's PostMark benchmark designed to simulate small-file testing similar to the tasks endured by web and mail servers. This test profile will set PostMark to perform 25,000 transactions with 500 files simultaneously with the file sizes ranging between 5 and 512 kilobytes. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org TPS, More Is Better PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 26.77, N = 3 2757 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3
Ethr Ethr is a cross-platform Golang-written network performance measurement tool developed by Microsoft that is capable of testing multiple protocols and different measurements. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.77, N = 3 46.79 MIN: 38.02 / MAX: 103.9
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.64, N = 3 47.15 MIN: 38.49 / MAX: 97.05
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.42, N = 3 47.14 MIN: 38.49 / MAX: 105.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.32, N = 3 47.03 MIN: 38.77 / MAX: 104.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.56, N = 3 47.39 MIN: 38.45 / MAX: 84.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 46.67 MIN: 38.46 / MAX: 91.9
OpenBenchmarking.org Microseconds, Fewer Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.19, N = 3 46.97 MIN: 38.66 / MAX: 82.25
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 336.32, N = 12 20278.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 207.82, N = 3 34069.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 624.72, N = 3 41592.22
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 288.12, N = 12 21484.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 709.79, N = 4 43252.83
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 744.50, N = 3 43541.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 2.68, N = 3 630.19
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 15.28, N = 3 1257.08
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 22.17, N = 3 1984.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 35.95, N = 3 2157.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 517.27, N = 3 41308.89
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 93.35, N = 3 44421.56
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 10K 20K 30K 40K 50K SE +/- 524.13, N = 9 46944.07
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 657.19, N = 3 43972.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 2138.47, N = 12 55124.80
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 3784.02, N = 12 100096.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 7.51, N = 3 2172.29
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 18.96, N = 3 2116.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Mbits/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 22.37, N = 3 1964.38
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 80.90, N = 3 11167
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1498.91, N = 12 7840
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 73031.14, N = 12 131995
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 53239.82, N = 9 84904
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1651.63, N = 9 10937
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 30052.89, N = 9 39887
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 19139.00, N = 10 26362
OpenBenchmarking.org Connections/sec, More Is Better Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: 127.0.0.1 - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 110067.09, N = 9 209418
C-Ray This is a test of C-Ray, a simple raytracer designed to test the floating-point CPU performance. This test is multi-threaded (16 threads per core), will shoot 8 rays per pixel for anti-aliasing, and will generate a 1600 x 1200 image. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 70 140 210 280 350 SE +/- 0.17, N = 3 337.43 1. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3
OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 1.14, N = 3 370.60
OpenSSL OpenSSL is an open-source toolkit that implements SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) and TLS (Transport Layer Security) protocols. This test measures the RSA 4096-bit performance of OpenSSL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Signs Per Second, More Is Better OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 110 220 330 440 550 SE +/- 4.06, N = 3 519 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -m64 -O3 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl
Apache Benchmark This is a test of ab, which is the Apache benchmark program. This test profile measures how many requests per second a given system can sustain when carrying out 1,000,000 requests with 100 requests being carried out concurrently. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Requests Per Second, More Is Better Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 36.61, N = 3 8852 1. (CC) gcc options: -shared -fPIC -O2 -pthread
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 1181.57, N = 12 14051
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 7K 14K 21K 28K 35K SE +/- 503.49, N = 5 33011
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 12K 24K 36K 48K 60K SE +/- 1236.10, N = 12 57296
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 139.98, N = 7 11166
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 11K 22K 33K 44K 55K SE +/- 597.33, N = 3 53653
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1866.33, N = 12 95403
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1873.70, N = 12 135733
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 697.86, N = 12 25077
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 20K 40K 60K 80K 100K SE +/- 1816.22, N = 3 92288
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2189.04, N = 12 156117
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 2218.67, N = 3 192597
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 9K 18K 27K 36K 45K SE +/- 564.69, N = 7 43419
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1868.73, N = 12 127861
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 3343.38, N = 12 202667
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 5028.15, N = 3 274261
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 1429.33, N = 12 117397
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 2937.41, N = 12 260075
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 903.08, N = 3 397483
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 8768.33, N = 12 542720
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 30K 60K 90K 120K 150K SE +/- 2272.00, N = 4 131168
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 40K 80K 120K 160K 200K SE +/- 4055.13, N = 12 202112
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 2 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 3717.72, N = 12 270507
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 2 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 50K 100K 150K 200K 250K SE +/- 2426.28, N = 12 238208
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 9506.22, N = 12 543232
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 6 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 12978.01, N = 12 809301
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 8 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 15130.73, N = 12 1083392
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 60K 120K 180K 240K 300K SE +/- 3135.08, N = 12 266155
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 6032.05, N = 5 401920
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 4 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 130K 260K 390K 520K 650K SE +/- 6256.74, N = 3 609280
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 90K 180K 270K 360K 450K SE +/- 4642.28, N = 12 400811
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 140K 280K 420K 560K 700K SE +/- 10401.51, N = 12 632661
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 6 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 11198.93, N = 12 856064
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 120K 240K 360K 480K 600K SE +/- 8927.03, N = 3 551936
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 23454.43, N = 12 856405
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 19787.22, N = 12 1136384
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 13856.62, N = 3 1105237
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 26190.62, N = 12 1648299
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 16 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 56948.59, N = 9 2204786
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 16 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 500K 1000K 1500K 2000K 2500K SE +/- 27713.24, N = 3 2270549
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 24 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 700K 1400K 2100K 2800K 3500K SE +/- 136495.28, N = 12 3255979
OpenBenchmarking.org usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is Better Schbench Message Threads: 32 - Workers Per Message Thread: 32 VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 900K 1800K 2700K 3600K 4500K SE +/- 140138.43, N = 12 4066304
VDISK - Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 (4 Cores), Motherboard: Nutanix AHV (1.9.1-5.el6 BIOS), Memory: 16384 MB + 8192 MB RAM, Disk: 537GB VDISK, Graphics: bochsdrmfb
OS: CentOS Linux 7, Kernel: 3.10.0-957.12.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: microsoft
Disk Notes: DEADLINE / attr2,inode64,noquota,relatime,rw,seclabelPython Notes: Python 2.7.5 + Python 3.6.6Security Notes: SELinux + KPTI + Load fences __user pointer sanitization + Full retpoline + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + PTE Inversion
Testing initiated at 10 May 2019 17:14 by user .