Coffeelake Beignet vs. OpenCL NEO Intel, "Blender 2.79a - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git", "Intel OpenCL NEO", "Blender 2.79a - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git", "Intel OpenCL NEO", "Blender 2.79a - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git", "Intel OpenCL NEO", "Blender 2.79a - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git", "Intel OpenCL NEO", "Blender 2.79a - Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git", "Intel OpenCL NEO", "clpeak - OpenCL Test: Kernel Latency", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",21.98,21.93,21.19 "Intel OpenCL NEO",23.66,24.02,23.82 "clpeak - OpenCL Test: Single-Precision Float", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",56.91,56.91,39.62,56.66,100.38,56.66,56.66,39.5,56.66,39.67,56.67,30.23 "Intel OpenCL NEO",458.81,458.6,458.63 "clpeak - OpenCL Test: Global Memory Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",35.41,7.05,33.44,33.41,33.41,33.42,33.48,33.45,33.43,33.47,33.45,33.45 "Intel OpenCL NEO",33.45,33.22,33.16 "clpeak - OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueReadBuffer", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",15.46,15.4,15.39 "Intel OpenCL NEO",15.64,15.27,14.62,15.61,15.57 "clpeak - OpenCL Test: Transfer Bandwidth enqueueWriteBuffer", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",40.96,40.51,40.98 "Intel OpenCL NEO",41.47,41.17,41.29 "CoMD OpenCL 2017-07-06 - Average Atom Update Rate", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",2.58,2.57,2.59 "Intel OpenCL NEO",2.57,2.58,2.58 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",13.804,13.89,13.903 "Intel OpenCL NEO",13.774,13.907,13.934 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",6.462,6.477,6.496 "Intel OpenCL NEO",6.454,6.498,6.476 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",0.183,0.183,0.186 "Intel OpenCL NEO",0.186,0.187,0.19 "Darktable 2.4.2 - Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",4.745,4.749,4.769 "Intel OpenCL NEO",4.788,4.755,4.789 "LeelaChessZero 0.20.1 - Backend: OpenCL", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",47.278,42.0454,46.6298,68.2958,55.6809,53.3208 "Intel OpenCL NEO",106.477,105.682,105.029 "LuxMark 3.1 - OpenCL Device: GPU - Scene: Hotel", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",2,3,134,2,4,5,3,3,4,2 "Intel OpenCL NEO",603,624,612 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenCL BFS", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",0.959125,0.965082,0.962884 "Intel OpenCL NEO",1.022457,1.032213,1.059206 "Parboil 2.5 - Test: OpenCL LBM", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",78.597572,78.582695,78.501534 "Intel OpenCL NEO",69.558151,68.334702,69.546814 "Rodinia 2.4 - Test: OpenCL Heartwall", Lower Results Are Better "Beignet Git",12.52343416214,42.403953075409,35.008208036423,42.935297966003,35.135001897812,27.999330997467,34.09322810173,35.999274969101,35.790456056595,42.10465502739,42.986444950104,35.081465005875 "Intel OpenCL NEO",9.2038531303406,9.0929470062256,9.1912491321564 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",10.4807,6.998,10.7522,10.1357,10.0389,10.7158,9.6515,10.5579,10.35,10.4438,6.9536,7.1363,9.8079,7.022,6.9507 "Intel OpenCL NEO",13.7875,13.9617,13.9745 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",15.9807,15.9801,15.9802 "Intel OpenCL NEO",17.6678,17.6844,17.5922 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",0.373,0.373,0.373 "Intel OpenCL NEO",0.3853,0.3853,0.3852 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",467.229,467.206,467.221 "Intel OpenCL NEO",1452.4,1511.51,1555.53,1457.53,1445.58,1629.06,1523.43,1404.74,1473.09,1430.54,1470.74,1426.82,1522,1367.24,1464.28 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",20.6575,20.448,20.337 "Intel OpenCL NEO",29.8081,29.3072,29.4257 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",37.7729,40.3298,40.392,37.7729,39.0677,39.1845 "Intel OpenCL NEO",30.1062,28.0724,29.4562,29.4271 "SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10 - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",60.2543,59.2088,59.7621 "Intel OpenCL NEO",57.0993,57.0952,57.0891 "ViennaCL 1.4.2 - OpenCL LU Factorization", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",7.45085,7.46709,8.24211,9.04299,8.26838,7.81095,7.92373,12.564,7.60631,8.69682,7.42672,9.74913 "Intel OpenCL NEO",21.1944,21.2256,21.2841 "Xsbench OpenCL 2017-07-06 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Beignet Git",11454155,11459518,11452836