win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06X96V, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB 2400MHz HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH, Disk: 477GB THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB + 932GB ASMT 2105 + 0GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable + 954GB Inateck ASM1153E + 224GB Inateck + 60GB Lexar USB Flash Drive USB Device + 58GB SanDisk Ultra Fit USB Device + 233GB Inateck + 7GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device, Graphics: Intel HD P630 + DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 4GB (1150/2505MHz), Network: TAP-Windows V9 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + USB
OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 391.25 (23.20.16.4973), Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 3.35, N = 2 56.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 1.36, N = 2 26.90
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 2.68, N = 2 60.79
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 1.02, N = 2 35.69
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 2.52, N = 2 76.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.11, N = 2 28.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 8.01, N = 2 89.10
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 2.27, N = 2 43.77
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.60, N = 2 26.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 0.66, N = 2 69.72
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 4.67, N = 2 35.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 2.04, N = 2 69.11
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 1.71, N = 2 68.55
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.10, N = 2 31.00
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 5.47, N = 2 88.81
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 1.85, N = 2 33.42
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 2.80, N = 2 42.21
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 3.66, N = 2 54.48
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 2.19, N = 2 61.99
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.34, N = 2 49.67
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.46, N = 2 21.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 2 20.99
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 14 28 42 56 70 SE +/- 9.13, N = 2 60.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 2.42, N = 2 59.56
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.37, N = 2 70.36
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 1.49, N = 2 48.65
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.12, N = 2 66.33
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.85, N = 2 31.46
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 9.53, N = 2 39.94
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.70, N = 2 29.31
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 13.77, N = 2 54.02
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 2.57, N = 2 28.03
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 3.74, N = 2 34.74
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.08, N = 2 42.30
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 2.48, N = 2 60.14
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 2.34, N = 2 70.61
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 7 14 21 28 35 SE +/- 0.43, N = 2 32.10
Unigine Valley This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D9 win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.37, N = 2 42.39
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 7.60, N = 2 52.58
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 2.87, N = 2 25.92
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 3.02, N = 2 34.96
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 4.62, N = 2 48.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 2.34, N = 2 21.43
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 16.01, N = 2 50.23
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 1.81, N = 2 24.01
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 7.80, N = 2 36.75
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 6.48, N = 2 68.19 MIN: 13 / MAX: 126
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 1.75, N = 2 70.04 MIN: 18 / MAX: 138
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 16 32 48 64 80 SE +/- 15.08, N = 2 69.86 MIN: 12 / MAX: 164
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 10.01, N = 2 86.10 MIN: 46 / MAX: 172
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 10.41, N = 2 82.98 MIN: 41 / MAX: 168
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 19.85, N = 2 98.40 MIN: 34 / MAX: 190
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 20 40 60 80 100 SE +/- 6.37, N = 2 109.89 MIN: 62 / MAX: 226
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.46, N = 2 114.66 MIN: 67 / MAX: 231
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 4.29, N = 2 113.22 MIN: 73 / MAX: 195
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 21.51, N = 2 118.46 MIN: 62 / MAX: 230
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.55, N = 2 140.39 MIN: 82 / MAX: 373
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 5.01, N = 2 153.26 MIN: 90 / MAX: 365
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 4.41, N = 2 162.19 MIN: 101 / MAX: 400
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.95, N = 2 160.51 MIN: 106 / MAX: 276
GpuTest GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 58.50, N = 2 1033
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 71.00, N = 2 1511
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 35.50, N = 2 1836
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 1052.50, N = 2 10051
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 1673.50, N = 2 12123
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 45.00, N = 2 3125
GpuTest GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 6.00, N = 2 1735
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 4.00, N = 2 2820
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 150 300 450 600 750 SE +/- 5.00, N = 2 675
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 3672.50, N = 2 23420
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 5.50, N = 2 1102
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 2827.00, N = 2 26531
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1400 2800 4200 5600 7000 SE +/- 413.50, N = 2 6542
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 29.00, N = 2 4886
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 884.50, N = 2 22976
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 11.50, N = 2 2647
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 80.00, N = 2 5132
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 13.00, N = 2 2407
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 123.50, N = 2 6269
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 5K 10K 15K 20K 25K SE +/- 1663.50, N = 2 25154
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 22.00, N = 2 1337
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 900 1800 2700 3600 4500 SE +/- 234.50, N = 2 4374
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 129.00, N = 2 9196
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 275.00, N = 2 5095
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 39.50, N = 2 1969
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 1447.50, N = 2 20222
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 72.00, N = 2 1993
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 SE +/- 265.50, N = 2 4624
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 4K 8K 12K 16K 20K SE +/- 482.00, N = 2 17756
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 28.00, N = 2 1330
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 4.50, N = 2 1897
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 153.50, N = 2 3217
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 5.50, N = 2 435
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 435.00, N = 2 8505
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 917.50, N = 2 14890
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 13.50, N = 2 2046
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 78.00, N = 2 2615
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 68.50, N = 2 902
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 105.00, N = 2 11678
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 92.00, N = 2 1456
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 6K 12K 18K 24K 30K SE +/- 1474.00, N = 2 26245
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 3K 6K 9K 12K 15K SE +/- 2944.50, N = 2 14476
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 20.50, N = 2 1758
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 93.50, N = 2 999
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1100 2200 3300 4400 5500 SE +/- 72.00, N = 2 5203
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 8K 16K 24K 32K 40K SE +/- 2399.50, N = 2 38737
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 90 180 270 360 450 SE +/- 7.00, N = 2 428
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 118.00, N = 2 10859
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 148.50, N = 2 2037
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 SE +/- 46.00, N = 2 2367
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1500 3000 4500 6000 7500 SE +/- 71.00, N = 2 7128
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 1300 2600 3900 5200 6500 SE +/- 224.50, N = 2 6274
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 15.50, N = 2 1098
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 800 x 600 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 8.00, N = 2 2949
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 11.00, N = 2 665
OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 200 400 600 800 1000 841
Nexuiz This is a benchmark of Nexuiz, a popular open-source first-person shooter. This game uses the DarkPlaces engine, which is a largely modified version of the Quake engine with extra features such as High Dynamic Range rendering and OpenGL 2.0 shaders. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - HDR: No - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.95, N = 2 202.51 MIN: 124 / MAX: 447
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - HDR: No - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 41.96, N = 2 151.08 MIN: 51 / MAX: 396
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 11.26, N = 2 120.55 MIN: 38 / MAX: 333
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 3.81, N = 2 147.62 MIN: 84 / MAX: 350
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.13, N = 2 142.18 MIN: 81 / MAX: 375
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - HDR: No - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 13.69, N = 2 161.05 MIN: 88 / MAX: 417
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 18.48, N = 2 143.75 MIN: 75 / MAX: 476
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 23.18, N = 2 115.88 MIN: 49 / MAX: 333
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - HDR: Yes - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.10, N = 2 154.63 MIN: 92 / MAX: 370
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 0.65, N = 2 155.30 MIN: 88 / MAX: 417
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - HDR: No - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.50, N = 2 215.56 MIN: 127 / MAX: 488
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - HDR: No - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.16, N = 2 192.59 MIN: 100 / MAX: 431
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - HDR: Yes - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.36, N = 2 167.33 MIN: 98 / MAX: 435
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: No - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 30 60 90 120 150 SE +/- 26.64, N = 2 146 MIN: 74 / MAX: 364
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - HDR: No - Sound: Off win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 50 100 150 200 250 SE +/- 0.23, N = 2 205.29 MIN: 119 / MAX: 447
OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Nexuiz 2.5.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - HDR: No - Sound: On win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.43, N = 2 160.17 MIN: 81 / MAX: 339
win10-pro3_graphics-bench_02May2019 Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 @ 3.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06X96V, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB 2400MHz HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH, Disk: 477GB THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB + 932GB ASMT 2105 + 0GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device + 477GB ASMT 2115 + 1863GB Samsung M3 Portable + 954GB Inateck ASM1153E + 224GB Inateck + 60GB Lexar USB Flash Drive USB Device + 58GB SanDisk Ultra Fit USB Device + 233GB Inateck + 7GB Generic MassStorageClass USB Device, Graphics: Intel HD P630 + DisplayLink USB Device + DisplayLink USB Device + NVIDIA Quadro M1200 4GB (1150/2505MHz), Network: TAP-Windows V9 + Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 + USB
OS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 17134, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 391.25 (23.20.16.4973), Vulkan: 1.0.65, Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Testing initiated at 2 May 2019 09:00 by user Chi.