2019-04-19-SO-001-BGD 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 testing with a Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF v1.01 (3.0a BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 3.60GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DRL-3F/iF v1.01 (3.0a BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 4 x 16384 MB DDR3-1866MT/s Samsung M393B2G70DB0-, Disk: 120GB KINGSTON SA400S3, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Monitor: SE2717H/HX, Network: 2 x Intel 82574L OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-47-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1280x1024 AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 50.47 |============================================ AOM AV1 2019-02-11 AV1 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.11 |============================================= asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 44392484 |========================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5.09 |============================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 10.79 |============================================ Botan 2.8.0 Test: KASUMI - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 72.27 |============================================ Botan 2.8.0 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 71.60 |============================================ Botan 2.8.0 Test: AES-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2218.78 |========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2178.77 |========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Twofish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 267.14 |=========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 267.00 |=========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Blowfish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 206.88 |=========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 207.97 |=========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 106.29 |=========================================== Botan 2.8.0 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 106.22 |=========================================== Timed GCC Compilation 8.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 925.02 |=========================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 31.56 |============================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 60.32 |============================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 343.22 |=========================================== Timed PHP Compilation 7.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 62.36 |============================================ Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Raytests Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.48 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5.22 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.31 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.37 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.80 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.21 |============================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.51 |============================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 27720530.49 |====================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1 |================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Register Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1 |================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1 |================================================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 65.81 |============================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3039.80 |========================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22392.52 |========================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 25860.26 |========================================= CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.77 |============================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.47 |============================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 75109 |============================================ Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 43.19 |============================================ Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.88 |============================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 23.25 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: m7m kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 393.41 |=========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: deep kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 9814.23 |========================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: lbry kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 10233 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: skein kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 28829 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: myr-gr kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 10580 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: sha256t kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 59694 |============================================ Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6167247 |========================================== Cython benchmark 0.27 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 32.30 |============================================ dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 57.24 |============================================ LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 37.33 |============================================ eSpeak Speech Engine 1.48.04 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 42.21 |============================================ FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 8.19 |============================================= FFTE 6.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5530.72 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7184.67 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7170.00 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7449.37 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6160.63 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6288.23 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6124.83 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6026.80 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5532.77 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5259.63 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5066.07 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6040.53 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5600.11 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5408.10 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5168.13 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4303.77 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3791.80 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 9714.20 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 14814 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 21324 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20694 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 18326 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19143 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20881 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 16588 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15025 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15965 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 21251 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20641 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19110 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 13972 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12736 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 10283 |============================================ Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11887.03 |========================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 47824.23 |========================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.57 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 47559.73 |========================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.87 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20.28 |============================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.85 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.59 |============================================= GNU GMP GMPbench 6.1.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3501.50 |========================================== GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.76 |============================================ 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.87 |============================================ Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 14343 |============================================ Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4082455 |========================================== Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20045335959 |====================================== Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 941804 |=========================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 190 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 193 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 151 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 155 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 202 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 144 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 214 |============================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.99 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.27 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7.38 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 13.62 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.76 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 25.34 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.97 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7.02 |============================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.82 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 24.11 |============================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 46.89 |============================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1583.55 |========================================== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.82 |============================================= High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.94 |============================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1799.01 |========================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 844.47 |=========================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1121.52 |========================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1733.06 |========================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3794.53 |========================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1501.47 |========================================== LLVM Test Suite 6.0.0 Time To Run Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.31 |============================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1121.52 |========================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 416.13 |=========================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 407.50 |=========================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1092.50 |========================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2164.58 |========================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1526.87 |========================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 27 |=============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 87 |=============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 304 |============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 880 |============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 340 |============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 418 |============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 165 |============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 801 |============================================== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 48.01 |============================================ Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.00 |============================================= Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22.36 |============================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 69.45 |============================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 94.27 |============================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 152.47 |=========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.83 |============================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 155.94 |=========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 59.85 |============================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 59.09 |============================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 661.20 |=========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 661.73 |=========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 23.38 |============================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3761.97 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 8.80 |============================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19.83 |============================================ MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 538.08 |=========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 8542.30 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6562.83 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6873.92 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 27549.83 |========================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_all - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 27521.03 |========================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 203.47 |=========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3709.17 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6266.18 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1709.92 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3686.86 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6206.88 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_all - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22813.77 |========================================= MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_alexnet - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1665.73 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8u8s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1452.16 |========================================== MKL-DNN 2019-04-16 Harness: Convolution Batch conv_googlenet_v3 - Data Type: u8s8f32s32 ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1449.43 |========================================== GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Global Score > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6227 |============================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.43 |============================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 65.61 |============================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 60.38 |============================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 69.93 |============================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 75.03 |============================================ N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 8.73 |============================================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.09953 |========================================== NoiseLevel Activity Level < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1070562844 |======================================= OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 93.86 |============================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2634.30 |========================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 87.12 |============================================ Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.77 |============================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11.90 |============================================ Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 173.03 |=========================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.19830944 |======================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.00120948 |======================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.28 |============================================ PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.10 |============================================ PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 18.42 |============================================ POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 37.17 |============================================ Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20.01 |============================================ PSSTOP Memory test kb < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 565502 |=========================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1046.83 |========================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 333.35 |=========================================== R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.2930 |=========================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 52.78 |============================================ Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 16.99 |============================================ Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19.87 |============================================ Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 53.79 |============================================ Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11.94 |============================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 554.68 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 119.68 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 256.24 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 573.99 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 769.04 |=========================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1054.43 |========================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 8.71 |============================================= Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 39846050 |========================================= Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 16.25 |============================================ SVT-AV1 2019-03-07 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.25 |============================================= SVT-HEVC 2019-02-03 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20.62 |============================================ Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 559015607 |======================================== System BZIP2 Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11.59 |============================================ System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.24 |============================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 593 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1905 |============================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2841 |============================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7 |================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 30 |=============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 107 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 86372 |============================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 86 |=============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 122 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 144 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 184 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 206 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 381 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 265 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 470 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 315 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 561 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 383 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 398 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 439 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 464 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 783 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 545 |============================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB ms < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 547 |============================================== Tachyon 0.98.9 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.29 |============================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1014068 |========================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 487.69 |=========================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.0 vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 17.78 |============================================ x264 2018-09-25 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 100.20 |=========================================== x265 3.0 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 26.06 |============================================ Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 13.64 |============================================