2019-02-25-2239 Intel Core i5-6500 testing with a ASUS Q170-4S (A233NP0 BIOS) and Intel HD 530 on Ubuntu 18.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M: Processor: Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS Q170-4S (A233NP0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M, Graphics: Intel HD 530 (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: 23.6 monitor, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-10-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 308.64 |======================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 239.07 |======================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 460.27 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 114.47 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 115.07 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 114.10 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 115.00 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 73.03 |========================================= ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 74.33 |========================================= ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 72.90 |========================================= ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 74.27 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.31 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.70 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.40 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.60 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.34 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.12 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 86.05 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 86.01 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.50 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.37 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 85.91 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 85.97 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.24 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.29 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.27 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.31 |========================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2375.99 |======================================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 207.83 |======================================== Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 38.48 |========================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 38.74 |========================================= Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 37317 |========================================= Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 58.42 |========================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 33.78 |========================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 7.93 |========================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1597528.58 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2064819.62 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1628667.34 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2281418.83 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1738284.17 |==================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1177 |========================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 574516 |========================================