2019-02-25-1956 Intel Core i5-6500 testing with a ASUS Q170-4S (A233NP0 BIOS) and Intel HD 530 on Ubuntu 18.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M: Processor: Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASUS Q170-4S (A233NP0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 1000GB Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M, Graphics: Intel HD 530 (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: 23.6 monitor, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-10-generic (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 294.27 |======================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 241.98 |======================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 376.46 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 114.87 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 114.87 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 114.83 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Default - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 113.77 |======================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 72.73 |========================================= ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 73.37 |========================================= ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 72.20 |========================================= ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 74.60 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.58 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.00 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.27 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.40 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 166.02 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 165.80 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 85.86 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 86.01 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.39 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 107.46 |======================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 85.95 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 86.01 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 800 x 600 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.29 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.25 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.28 |========================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 62.27 |========================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2374.77 |======================================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 207.84 |======================================== Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 38.46 |========================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 38.72 |========================================= Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 37346 |========================================= Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 58.11 |========================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 33.80 |========================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 7.94 |========================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2615594.25 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2068979.29 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1606873.46 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 2455153.33 |==================================== Redis 4.0.8 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1751370.83 |==================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 1174 |========================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD10EZEX-22M . 571268 |========================================