11111 AMD Phenom II X6 1100T testing with a Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 (F7g BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 560 4096MB on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 11111: Processor: AMD Phenom 9750 @ 2.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte M52L-S3P (F2 BIOS), Chipset: NVIDIA MCP61, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 90GB Corsair Force GT + 1000GB Portable, Graphics: NVA0 1024MB, Audio: Realtek ALC883, Monitor: Viseo233D OS: LinuxMint 18.2, Kernel: 4.16.3-041603-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 3.4.6, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 18.0.5, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4 (ecryptfs), Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 11112: Processor: AMD Phenom 9750 @ 2.40GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte M52L-S3P (F2 BIOS), Chipset: NVIDIA MCP61, Memory: 4096MB, Disk: 90GB Corsair Force GT + 1000GB Portable, Graphics: NVA0 1024MB, Audio: Realtek ALC883, Monitor: Viseo233D OS: LinuxMint 18.2, Kernel: 4.16.3-041603-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 3.4.6, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 18.0.5, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4 (ecryptfs), Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 confronto 9750 vs 1100t: Processor: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 (F7g BIOS), Chipset: AMD RD790 + SB600, Memory: 8192MB, Disk: 128GB DREVO X1 Pro SSD + 500GB Seagate ST95005620AS + 1000GB Western Digital WD10JPVT-00M, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 560 4096MB, Audio: C-Media CMI8788, Monitor: DELL U2412M, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-45-lowlatency (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, OpenGL: 4.6.13542, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2766.4), Compiler: GCC 7.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 3874637 |============================= 11111 ................... 3898585 |============================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 5895310 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 415 |================================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 606 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Bsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 1131 |============================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 1785 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 10160 |============================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 15710 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Hsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 7403 |============================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 11245 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Lsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 23.69 |===================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 29.17 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Tsearch Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 34.52 |========================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 62.55 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 459 |============================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 757 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 2447070 |======================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 2681244 |============================================ Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 11730 |=================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 15568 |============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 2430 |======================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 4815 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.07.26 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 355 |================================================ confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 333 |============================================= John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 3455 |====================================== 11112 ................... 2557 |============================ confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 4300 |=============================================== John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 7675667 |========================= 11112 ................... 3069583 |========== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 13268333 |=========================================== John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 83124 |=============================== 11112 ................... 35510 |============= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 122259 |============================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better 11111 ................... 30.01 |======================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 34.84 |============================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 11111 ................... 77.22 |============================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 56.95 |================================== WavPack Audio Encoding 5.1 WAV To WavPack Seconds < Lower Is Better 11111 ................... 14.00 |============================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 10.02 |================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 590081 |================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 789549 |============================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 11111 ................... 23.51 |============================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 16.35 |================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 479 |================================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 700 |================================================ QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Text Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 18.18 |============================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 28.12 |============================================== QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 228 |======================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 474 |================================================ QGears2 Rendering: OpenGL - Test: Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 331 |===== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 2934 |=============================================== QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Text Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 16.24 |============================= confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 26.10 |============================================== QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 105 |============================ confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 179 |================================================ QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Text Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 28.67 |============================ confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 47.46 |============================================== QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Gears Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 111 |============================ confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 191 |================================================ QGears2 Rendering: CPU-based Raster - Test: Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 305 |===================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 709 |================================================ QGears2 Rendering: XRender Extension - Test: Image Scaling Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 11111 ................... 359 |==================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 852 |================================================ Render Bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 11111 ................... 24.12 |============================================== confronto 9750 vs 1100t . 19.82 |======================================