Intel Core i7 testing with a Apple MacBook Pro and Intel Iris Plus 650 2GB on macOS 10.14.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1901026-JUST-190102650
2019-01-01-2133
Intel Core i7 testing with a Apple MacBook Pro and Intel Iris Plus 650 2GB on macOS 10.14.2 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Intel Core i9-9900K:
Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF (F1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device a36f, Memory: 32768MB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 850 + 256GB Samsung SSD 840 + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB (1290/3504MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: SyncMaster, Network: Intel Connection + Intel Device a370
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.3, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: NVIDIA 415.25, OpenGL: 4.6.0, Compiler: GCC 5.5.0 + CUDA 9.1, File-System: ext4 (ecryptfs), Screen Resolution: 3520x1200
Intel Core i7:
Processor: Intel Core i7 @ 3.50GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: Apple MacBook Pro, Memory: 2 x 8 GB LPDDR3-2133MHz, Disk: 932GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus 650 2GB, Monitor: Color LCD
OS: macOS 10.14.2, Kernel: 18.2.0 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, OpenGL: 2.1, Compiler: Apple LLVM 10.0.0 (clang-1000.10.44.4) + GCC 4.2.1 + Xcode 10.1, File-System: APFS, Screen Resolution: 2560x1600
Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 30.25 |======
Intel Core i7 ....... 239.44 |=================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 80.43 |========
Intel Core i7 ....... 505.76 |=================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 4001.95 |================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 54165.03 |===============================================
CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 33311.35 |===============================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 763 |====================================================
Intel Core i7 ....... 655 |=============================================
Crafty 25.2
Elapsed Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 9357471 |================================================
x264 2018-09-25
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 91.11 |==================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 1346 |===================================================
Intel Core i7 ....... 1119 |==========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 1169 |===================================================
Intel Core i7 ....... 1129 |=================================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 851 |====================================================
Intel Core i7 ....... 704 |===========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 289 |====================================================
Intel Core i7 ....... 192 |===================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 161 |====================================================
Intel Core i7 ....... 132 |===========================================