armx5
Unknown testing with a GIGABYTE MT91-FS1-00 v01000100 (F10 BIOS) and ASPEED ASPEED Family on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91: 

	Processor: Unknown (224 Cores), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MT91-FS1-00 v01000100 (F10 BIOS), Chipset: Cavium Device af00, Memory: 65536MB, Disk: 320GB TOSHIBA MK3261GS + 7 x 1920GB DOPE1920S5xnNMRI + 8GB DataTraveler 2.0, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel 82571EB Gigabit

	OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5, Kernel: 4.14.0-49.13.1.el7a.aarch64 (aarch64) 20180827, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768


Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 1.44 |================================


PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 93859 |===============================


Apache Benchmark 2.4.29
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 8493 |================================


7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 101083 |==============================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 209 |=================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 336 |=================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 214 |=================================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 103.01 |==============================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 61.67 |===============================


SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 185 |=================================


CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 18679 |===============================


CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 16379 |===============================


CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 3186 |================================


Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memcpy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 5150 |================================


SQLite 3.7.17
Timed SQLite Insertions
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 6.56 |================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 89.65 |===============================


Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memset
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 14518 |===============================