armx5 Unknown testing with a GIGABYTE MT91-FS1-00 v01000100 (F10 BIOS) and ASPEED ASPEED Family on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91: Processor: Unknown (224 Cores), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MT91-FS1-00 v01000100 (F10 BIOS), Chipset: Cavium Device af00, Memory: 65536MB, Disk: 320GB TOSHIBA MK3261GS + 7 x 1920GB DOPE1920S5xnNMRI + 8GB DataTraveler 2.0, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel 82571EB Gigabit OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.5, Kernel: 4.14.0-49.13.1.el7a.aarch64 (aarch64) 20180827, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 185 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 61.67 |=============================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 103.01 |============================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 214 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 336 |================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 209 |================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 5150 |================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 3186 |================================ CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 16379 |=============================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 18679 |=============================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 1.44 |================================ SQLite 3.7.17 Timed SQLite Insertions Seconds < Lower Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 6.56 |================================ 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 101083 |============================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 89.65 |=============================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 8493 |================================ PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 93859 |=============================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better Cavium Thunder X2 in Gigabyte R281-T91 . 14518 |===============================