Tww2 GCN 1.0 1.1

Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS) and Gigabyte AMD Radeon HD 8800 2GB on Ubuntu 18.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1811230-SK-TWW2GCN1027
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results
Show Result Confidence Charts
Allow Limiting Results To Certain Suite(s)

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Toggle/Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Radeon R9 285
November 23 2018
  2 Hours, 54 Minutes
Radeon R9 270X
November 23 2018
  2 Hours, 27 Minutes
Invert Behavior (Only Show Selected Data)
  2 Hours, 41 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Radeon R9 285

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 200 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.19.2-041902-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW STIBP + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Radeon R9 270X

Changed Graphics to Gigabyte AMD Radeon HD 8800 2GB.

Kernel Change: radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1

Tww2 GCN 1.0 1.1OpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM16384MB2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GBXFX AMD Radeon R9 200 2GBGigabyte AMD Radeon HD 8800 2GBRealtek ALC1220DELL P2415QIntel ConnectionUbuntu 18.104.19.2-041902-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.30.1X Server 1.20.1modesetting 1.20.14.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0)1.1.70GCC 8.2.0ext43840x2160ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionTww2 GCN 1.0 1.1 BenchmarksSystem Logs- Radeon R9 285: amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1- Radeon R9 270X: radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1 - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance- __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW STIBP + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Radeon R9 285 vs. Radeon R9 270X ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+9.1%+9.1%+18.2%+18.2%+27.3%+27.3%+36.4%+36.4%1280 x 1024 - Medium - Skaven Battle36.5%800 x 600 - Medium - Skaven Battle35.9%1024 x 768 - Medium - Skaven Battle35.7%1024 x 768 - Medium - F.G.B33.6%800 x 600 - Medium - F.G.B33.1%1920 x 1080 - Medium - F.G.B31.8%1280 x 1024 - Medium - F.G.B31.1%1600 x 1200 - Medium - Skaven Battle30.8%1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battle30.8%1600 x 1200 - Medium - F.G.B24.2%1920 x 1200 - Medium - Skaven Battle19.6%1920 x 1200 - Medium - F.G.B11.8%Total War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IITotal War: WARHAMMER IIRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X

Tww2 GCN 1.0 1.1tww2: 800 x 600 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1024 x 768 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1280 x 1024 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1600 x 1200 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 1920 x 1200 - Medium - Skaven Battletww2: 800 x 600 - Medium - Fallen Gates Battletww2: 1024 x 768 - Medium - Fallen Gates Battletww2: 1280 x 1024 - Medium - Fallen Gates Battletww2: 1600 x 1200 - Medium - Fallen Gates Battletww2: 1920 x 1080 - Medium - Fallen Gates Battletww2: 1920 x 1200 - Medium - Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X95.0094.7073.1755.9752.8348.3094.2394.1366.6047.2846.0039.4369.9369.7753.6042.8040.4040.3770.7770.4750.8038.0734.9035.27OpenBenchmarking.org

Total War: WARHAMMER II

Total War: WARHAMMER II on Steam. The test profile assumes you have a Steam account, have Steam installed for the system, and that you own a copy of this game. This automates the process of executing the game and using its built-in benchmark mode. Backs up old preferences (in ~/.local/share/feral-interactive/) for the run. NOTES for cross-platform comparisons: TODO Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 800 x 600 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X20406080100SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 395.0069.93MIN: 6.4 / MAX: 271.3MIN: 5.9 / MAX: 251.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X20406080100SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 394.7069.77MIN: 24.2 / MAX: 255.1MIN: 23 / MAX: 226.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1632486480SE +/- 0.62, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 373.1753.60MIN: 23.6 / MAX: 259.9MIN: 20.7 / MAX: 226.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1326395265SE +/- 0.87, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 355.9742.80MIN: 21.5 / MAX: 228.9MIN: 17.4 / MAX: 210.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1224364860SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.42, N = 352.8340.40MIN: 21.1 / MAX: 211.1MIN: 17.8 / MAX: 220.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1122334455SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 348.3040.37MIN: 20.2 / MAX: 196.1MIN: 17.8 / MAX: 222.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 800 x 600 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X20406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 394.2370.77MIN: 27.9 / MAX: 343.6MIN: 26.2 / MAX: 268.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X20406080100SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 394.1370.47MIN: 31.2 / MAX: 280.6MIN: 26.5 / MAX: 271.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1530456075SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 366.6050.80MIN: 24.1 / MAX: 296.1MIN: 20.2 / MAX: 270.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1122334455SE +/- 1.23, N = 12SE +/- 0.15, N = 347.2838.07MIN: 1.2 / MAX: 304MIN: 16.7 / MAX: 254.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1020304050SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 1246.0034.90MIN: 18.8 / MAX: 265.5MIN: 14.1 / MAX: 310.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates BattleRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X918273645SE +/- 1.17, N = 12SE +/- 0.03, N = 339.4335.27MIN: 1.3 / MAX: 290.2MIN: 15.8 / MAX: 245

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 800 x 600 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1530456075Min: 4 / Avg: 10.48 / Max: 41.6Min: 4 / Avg: 14.35 / Max: 77.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X918273645Min: 3.9 / Avg: 10.57 / Max: 40.4Min: 4.5 / Avg: 14.3 / Max: 42.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1020304050Min: 4.2 / Avg: 13.88 / Max: 42.4Min: 4.4 / Avg: 18.69 / Max: 48.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1122334455Min: 4.4 / Avg: 18.08 / Max: 46.6Min: 4.8 / Avg: 22.94 / Max: 53.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1122334455Min: 4.7 / Avg: 18.85 / Max: 47.4Min: 5 / Avg: 24.27 / Max: 56.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Skaven Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1122334455Min: 5.4 / Avg: 20.79 / Max: 49.4Min: 5.6 / Avg: 24.74 / Max: 56.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 800 x 600 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X816243240Min: 2.9 / Avg: 10.63 / Max: 35.8Min: 3.7 / Avg: 14.14 / Max: 37

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1024 x 768 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X816243240Min: 3.6 / Avg: 10.64 / Max: 31.8Min: 4 / Avg: 14.17 / Max: 36.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1280 x 1024 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1020304050Min: 3.6 / Avg: 14.97 / Max: 39.9Min: 4.1 / Avg: 19.72 / Max: 48.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1600 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1224364860Min: 3.5 / Avg: 20.17 / Max: 49.7Min: 4 / Avg: 26.46 / Max: 59.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1224364860Min: 3.8 / Avg: 21.67 / Max: 53.3Min: 4.1 / Avg: 28.46 / Max: 63

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterTotal War: WARHAMMER II 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1200 - Graphics Preset: Medium - Scenario: Fallen Gates Battle - Total Frame TimeRadeon R9 285Radeon R9 270X1224364860Min: 4.3 / Avg: 23.62 / Max: 54.8Min: 4.3 / Avg: 28.39 / Max: 62.3

Radeon R9 285

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 200 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.19.2-041902-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW STIBP + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 23 November 2018 09:13 by user phoronix.

Radeon R9 270X

Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (0602 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 2000GB SABRENT + Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon HD 8800 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Connection

OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.19.2-041902-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.1, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.0.0-devel- padoka PPA (LLVM 8.0.0), Vulkan: 1.1.70, Compiler: GCC 8.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160

Kernel Notes: radeon.si_support=0 radeon.cik_support=0 amdgpu.si_support=1 amdgpu.cik_support=1
Processor Notes: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance
Security Notes: __user pointer sanitization + Full generic retpoline IBPB IBRS_FW STIBP + SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp

Testing initiated at 23 November 2018 12:10 by user phoronix.