NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Linux Compute Benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Ubuntu Linux compute OpenCL CUDA TensorFlow benchmarks. Tests by Michael Larabel for a future article on Phoronix.com.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1810180-SK-GPGPUCOMP97
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Multi-Core 3 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
OpenCL 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs
No Box Plots
On Line Graphs With Missing Data, Connect The Line Gaps

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs
Condense Test Profiles With Multiple Version Results Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RX 580
October 17 2018
  7 Minutes
R9 Fury
October 17 2018
  7 Minutes
RX Vega 56
October 17 2018
  6 Minutes
RX Vega 64
October 17 2018
  6 Minutes
GTX 970
October 18 2018
  13 Minutes
GTX 980
October 18 2018
  12 Minutes
GTX TITAN X
October 18 2018
  33 Minutes
GTX 1070
October 18 2018
  34 Minutes
GTX 1070 Ti
October 18 2018
  31 Minutes
GTX 1080
October 18 2018
  26 Minutes
GTX 1080 Ti
October 18 2018
  25 Minutes
RTX 2070
October 18 2018
  29 Minutes
RTX 2080 Ti
October 18 2018
  22 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  19 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Linux Compute BenchmarksProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 TiAMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX 32-Core @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads)ASUS ROG ZENITH EXTREME (1402 BIOS)AMD Family 17h32768MBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 500GBMSI AMD Radeon RX 580 8GBRealtek ALC1220ASUS VP28UIntel I211 Gigabit ConnectionUbuntu 18.044.18.0-041800-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.28.3X Server 1.19.6modesetting 1.19.64.5 Mesa 18.0.5 (LLVM 6.0.0)OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2679.0)GCC 7.3.0ext43840x2160Sapphire AMD Radeon 4GBAMD Radeon RX Vega 8GBeVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4GB (1163/3505MHz)NVIDIA 410.664.6.0OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.0.175GCC 7.3.0 + CUDA 10.0NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4GB (1126/3505MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB (1001/3505MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 8GB (1506/4006MHz)Zotac NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti 8GB (1607/4006MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB (1607/5005MHz)NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB (1480/5508MHz)eVGA NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 8GB (1410/7000MHz)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB (1350/7000MHz)OpenBenchmarking.orgCompiler Details- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --enable-libmpx --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemandSecurity Details- __user pointer sanitization + Full AMD retpoline IBPB + SSB disabled via prctl and seccompOpenCL Details- GTX 970: GPU Compute Cores: 1664- GTX 980: GPU Compute Cores: 2048- GTX TITAN X: GPU Compute Cores: 3072- GTX 1070: GPU Compute Cores: 1920- GTX 1070 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 2432- GTX 1080: GPU Compute Cores: 2560- GTX 1080 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 3584- RTX 2070: GPU Compute Cores: 2304- RTX 2080 Ti: GPU Compute Cores: 4352Python Details- GTX 970, GTX 980, GTX TITAN X, GTX 1070, GTX 1070 Ti, GTX 1080, GTX 1080 Ti, RTX 2070: Python 2.7.15rc1 + Python 3.6.6

RX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 TiResult OverviewPhoronix Test Suite100%396%693%989%1285%SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous ComputingSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous ComputingclpeakOpenCL - MD5 HashOpenCL - FFT SPI.C.I

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Linux Compute Benchmarksshoc: OpenCL - FFT SPshoc: OpenCL - MD5 Hashclpeak: Integer Compute INTv-ray: CUDA GPUaskap: Degriddingcuda-mini-nbody: Originalngc-tensorflow: ResNet-50, FP16ngc-tensorflow: ResNet-50, FP32ngc-tensorflow: AlexNet, FP16ngc-tensorflow: AlexNet, FP32ngc-tensorflow: Googlenet, FP16ngc-tensorflow: Inception v4, FP16ngc-tensorflow: VGG-16, FP16ngc-tensorflow: VGG-16, FP32parboil: OpenCL TPACFRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti5468.0612538219.20143092912.41198493116.4325024076.471142120.57929151.7110459981.594597.491314107.781065045.90120311461.5572610.30180578.721775033.551521231648157537142.6378.2772.831.4955010.67171087.991354639.691581241549150437443.9077.1371.701.2455613.66233983.031378031.911851361773166044852.9389.3379.031.2065414.31243983.411427332.761901411856174645453.8392.9782.771.2198319.96329266.852218821.232652072635249962272.17131.27119.270.93101519.28815066.552581917.712951812714211064185.20138.3390.671.03144334.871467953.913803711.22428276433032779861232041500.82OpenBenchmarking.org

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

The CUDA and OpenCL version of Vetter's Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing benchmark suite. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPS, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SPRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti30060090012001500SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 2.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 1.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.71, N = 3SE +/- 1.62, N = 3SE +/- 24.94, N = 3SE +/- 14.55, N = 3546821929931407459726550556654983101514431. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPS, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SPRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti30060090012001500Min: 545.95 / Avg: 546.11 / Max: 546.33Min: 821.15 / Avg: 821.27 / Max: 821.33Min: 925.54 / Avg: 929.24 / Max: 932.44Min: 930.1 / Avg: 930.9 / Max: 931.93Min: 405.88 / Avg: 407.17 / Max: 409.23Min: 458.57 / Avg: 459.17 / Max: 459.81Min: 724.37 / Avg: 725.7 / Max: 727.66Min: 549.01 / Avg: 550.16 / Max: 552.46Min: 555.12 / Avg: 555.75 / Max: 556.41Min: 652.89 / Avg: 654.04 / Max: 655.33Min: 979.53 / Avg: 982.76 / Max: 984.46Min: 988.27 / Avg: 1014.94 / Max: 1064.78Min: 1414.23 / Avg: 1442.89 / Max: 1461.631. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi

OpenBenchmarking.orgGHash/s, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 HashRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 38.069.2012.4116.436.477.4910.3010.6713.6614.3119.9619.2834.871. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi
OpenBenchmarking.orgGHash/s, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 HashRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti714212835Min: 8.06 / Avg: 8.06 / Max: 8.06Min: 9.2 / Avg: 9.2 / Max: 9.2Min: 12.4 / Avg: 12.41 / Max: 12.43Min: 16.41 / Avg: 16.43 / Max: 16.45Min: 6.47 / Avg: 6.47 / Max: 6.47Min: 7.48 / Avg: 7.49 / Max: 7.49Min: 10.29 / Avg: 10.3 / Max: 10.3Min: 10.66 / Avg: 10.67 / Max: 10.7Min: 13.62 / Avg: 13.66 / Max: 13.74Min: 14.28 / Avg: 14.31 / Max: 14.33Min: 19.87 / Avg: 19.96 / Max: 20.05Min: 19.24 / Avg: 19.28 / Max: 19.31Min: 34.78 / Avg: 34.87 / Max: 35.011. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lSHOCCommonMPI -lSHOCCommonOpenCL -lSHOCCommon -lOpenCL -lrt -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi

clpeak

Clpeak is designed to test the peak capabilities of OpenCL devices. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGIOPS, More Is BetterclpeakOpenCL Test: Integer Compute INTRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 1.34, N = 3SE +/- 2.43, N = 3SE +/- 17.17, N = 3SE +/- 3.45, N = 3SE +/- 19.05, N = 3SE +/- 6.94, N = 3SE +/- 28.40, N = 3SE +/- 23.15, N = 3SE +/- 104.07, N = 3SE +/- 495.02, N = 3SE +/- 947.36, N = 312531430198425021142131418051710233924393292815014679
OpenBenchmarking.orgGIOPS, More Is BetterclpeakOpenCL Test: Integer Compute INTRX 580R9 FuryRX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti3K6K9K12K15KMin: 1252.77 / Avg: 1252.81 / Max: 1252.86Min: 1429.49 / Avg: 1429.58 / Max: 1429.73Min: 1981.13 / Avg: 1983.51 / Max: 1985.77Min: 2498.82 / Avg: 2502.43 / Max: 2507.06Min: 1108.21 / Avg: 1142 / Max: 1164.17Min: 1308.2 / Avg: 1314.12 / Max: 1320.16Min: 1768.24 / Avg: 1804.9 / Max: 1832.22Min: 1698.02 / Avg: 1710.47 / Max: 1722.02Min: 2282.62 / Avg: 2339.26 / Max: 2371.33Min: 2393.07 / Avg: 2438.51 / Max: 2468.96Min: 3084.39 / Avg: 3292.48 / Max: 3400.5Min: 7160.52 / Avg: 8150.4 / Max: 8660.81Min: 12784.74 / Avg: 14678.79 / Max: 15669.11

Chaos Group V-RAY

This is a test of Chaos Group's V-RAY benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0Mode: CUDA GPUGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti306090120150SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3120.57107.7878.7287.9983.0383.4166.8566.5553.91
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0Mode: CUDA GPUGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti20406080100Min: 119.99 / Avg: 120.57 / Max: 120.94Min: 107.36 / Avg: 107.78 / Max: 108.55Min: 78.69 / Avg: 78.72 / Max: 78.77Min: 87.69 / Avg: 87.99 / Max: 88.19Min: 82.92 / Avg: 83.03 / Max: 83.13Min: 66.82 / Avg: 66.85 / Max: 66.9Min: 66.29 / Avg: 66.55 / Max: 67.04Min: 53.83 / Avg: 53.91 / Max: 53.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterChaos Group V-RAY 1.1.0System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti60120180240300Min: 157.1 / Avg: 222.29 / Max: 231.6Min: 96.2 / Avg: 233.17 / Max: 245.5Min: 170.3 / Avg: 297.26 / Max: 311.3Min: 130.8 / Avg: 219.79 / Max: 228.1Min: 136 / Avg: 229.75 / Max: 241.9Min: 162.9 / Avg: 219.51 / Max: 227.5Min: 168.6 / Avg: 277.93 / Max: 303.6Min: 91.4 / Avg: 260.71 / Max: 281.6Min: 99.6 / Avg: 298.13 / Max: 341.2

ASKAP tConvolveCuda

This is a CUDA benchmark of ATNF's ASKAP Benchmark with currently using the tConvolveCuda sub-test. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10Processing: DegriddingGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti8K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 109.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 233.57, N = 3SE +/- 233.57, N = 3SE +/- 259.50, N = 3SE +/- 806.83, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3929110650177501354613780142732218825819380371. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -m64 -std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lrt -lpthread -ldl
OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second, More Is BetterASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10Processing: DegriddingGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti7K14K21K28K35KMin: 9181.24 / Avg: 9290.54 / Max: 9509.14Min: 10650.2 / Avg: 10650.2 / Max: 10650.2Min: 17750.4 / Avg: 17750.4 / Max: 17750.4Min: 13312.8 / Avg: 13546.37 / Max: 14013.5Min: 13312.8 / Avg: 13779.93 / Max: 14013.5Min: 14013.5 / Avg: 14273 / Max: 14792Min: 24205.1 / Avg: 25818.77 / Max: 26625.6Min: 38036.6 / Avg: 38036.6 / Max: 38036.61. (CXX) g++ options: -fPIC -O3 -m64 -std=c++14 -lcudadevrt -lcudart_static -lrt -lpthread -ldl

CUDA Mini-Nbody

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10Test: OriginalGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti1224364860SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 351.7145.9033.5539.6931.9132.7621.2317.7111.22
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterCUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10Test: OriginalGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti1020304050Min: 51.67 / Avg: 51.71 / Max: 51.79Min: 45.56 / Avg: 45.9 / Max: 46.25Min: 32.93 / Avg: 33.55 / Max: 33.99Min: 39.66 / Avg: 39.69 / Max: 39.72Min: 31.86 / Avg: 31.91 / Max: 31.94Min: 32.68 / Avg: 32.76 / Max: 32.84Min: 21.13 / Avg: 21.23 / Max: 21.41Min: 17.64 / Avg: 17.71 / Max: 17.77Min: 11.13 / Avg: 11.22 / Max: 11.36

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterCUDA Mini-Nbody 2015-11-10System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 279 / Avg: 295.27 / Max: 300.3Min: 110.9 / Avg: 287.91 / Max: 313.7Min: 198.9 / Avg: 344.61 / Max: 382.3Min: 125.3 / Avg: 258.33 / Max: 276.4Min: 179.2 / Avg: 282.55 / Max: 312.9Min: 137.4 / Avg: 283.52 / Max: 306.4Min: 167.1 / Avg: 312.36 / Max: 369.9Min: 179 / Avg: 277.58 / Max: 305.7Min: 101.7 / Avg: 291.2 / Max: 393

NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow

This test profile uses the NVIDIA GPU Cloud (NGC/nvcr.io) for running the TensorFlow image inside Docker for benchmarking. You must have already signed into NGC for this test profile to work. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti90180270360450SE +/- 4.87, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 4.94, N = 3152158185190265295428
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti80160240320400Min: 147 / Avg: 151.97 / Max: 161.7Min: 158.1 / Avg: 158.27 / Max: 158.5Min: 184.4 / Avg: 184.73 / Max: 185.3Min: 189.7 / Avg: 190.03 / Max: 190.6Min: 263.3 / Avg: 265.27 / Max: 266.3Min: 293.3 / Avg: 295.03 / Max: 296.5Min: 420.9 / Avg: 427.7 / Max: 437.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.38480.76961.15441.53921.9240.480.690.760.810.931.291.71

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 144.3 / Avg: 318.58 / Max: 383.5Min: 125.5 / Avg: 230.02 / Max: 273.2Min: 124.9 / Avg: 242.2 / Max: 307Min: 133.9 / Avg: 235.46 / Max: 308.2Min: 128.1 / Avg: 284.31 / Max: 376Min: 96.1 / Avg: 229.19 / Max: 310.5Min: 102.9 / Avg: 249.44 / Max: 398.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti60120180240300SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3123124136141207181276
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti50100150200250Min: 121.5 / Avg: 122.67 / Max: 123.5Min: 123.7 / Avg: 123.8 / Max: 123.9Min: 136.1 / Avg: 136.17 / Max: 136.2Min: 140.8 / Avg: 140.9 / Max: 141.1Min: 206.9 / Avg: 207.03 / Max: 207.2Min: 180.6 / Avg: 181.17 / Max: 181.8Min: 275.4 / Avg: 276.27 / Max: 277.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: ResNet-50, FP32GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.22280.44560.66840.89121.1140.400.530.570.570.760.710.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 110.8 / Avg: 305.55 / Max: 380.1Min: 134.3 / Avg: 235.05 / Max: 274.2Min: 100.5 / Avg: 240.85 / Max: 305.9Min: 94 / Avg: 248.88 / Max: 305.1Min: 110.9 / Avg: 271.47 / Max: 375.5Min: 96.4 / Avg: 253.4 / Max: 312Min: 104.2 / Avg: 279.93 / Max: 400.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti9001800270036004500SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 2.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 2.12, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 5.17, N = 3SE +/- 5.30, N = 3104512031648154917731856263527144330
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti8001600240032004000Min: 1043.9 / Avg: 1044.87 / Max: 1045.4Min: 1199.7 / Avg: 1202.63 / Max: 1207.1Min: 1646.9 / Avg: 1647.63 / Max: 1648.8Min: 1547.5 / Avg: 1549.17 / Max: 1550.9Min: 1772.2 / Avg: 1773.03 / Max: 1774.3Min: 1852.1 / Avg: 1856.33 / Max: 1858.7Min: 2631.3 / Avg: 2635.43 / Max: 2639.4Min: 2705.9 / Avg: 2714.27 / Max: 2723.7Min: 4319.7 / Avg: 4329.5 / Max: 4337.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP16GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti481216204.374.846.017.507.418.7910.9011.3816.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 138.5 / Avg: 238.83 / Max: 290.6Min: 142.1 / Avg: 248.35 / Max: 303.8Min: 111.2 / Avg: 273.97 / Max: 376.8Min: 91.3 / Avg: 206.58 / Max: 261.8Min: 140.1 / Avg: 239.23 / Max: 301.2Min: 137.1 / Avg: 211.28 / Max: 282.8Min: 112.5 / Avg: 241.74 / Max: 360.8Min: 140.1 / Avg: 238.56 / Max: 305.1Min: 139.9 / Avg: 264.23 / Max: 398

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti7001400210028003500SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 2.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.80, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.65, N = 3SE +/- 1.49, N = 3SE +/- 4.62, N = 3SE +/- 5.44, N = 399811461575150416601746249921103277
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti6001200180024003000Min: 997.6 / Avg: 997.97 / Max: 998.5Min: 1146.3 / Avg: 1146.33 / Max: 1146.4Min: 1570.5 / Avg: 1574.9 / Max: 1578.5Min: 1502.2 / Avg: 1503.73 / Max: 1504.9Min: 1659.1 / Avg: 1660 / Max: 1661.7Min: 1744.6 / Avg: 1745.9 / Max: 1746.6Min: 2497.5 / Avg: 2499.13 / Max: 2502.1Min: 2101 / Avg: 2110.17 / Max: 2115.7Min: 3269.1 / Avg: 3277.13 / Max: 3287.5

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: AlexNet, FP32GTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti36912154.254.525.006.957.697.359.399.0711.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 141.7 / Avg: 234.98 / Max: 287.4Min: 168.7 / Avg: 253.88 / Max: 296.7Min: 207.4 / Avg: 314.76 / Max: 370.5Min: 160.5 / Avg: 216.33 / Max: 256.6Min: 141 / Avg: 215.98 / Max: 281Min: 140.8 / Avg: 237.52 / Max: 288Min: 173.7 / Avg: 266.19 / Max: 367.3Min: 94.9 / Avg: 232.75 / Max: 306.7Min: 146.4 / Avg: 287.83 / Max: 399.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti2004006008001000SE +/- 1.26, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.51, N = 3SE +/- 2.13, N = 3371374448454622641986
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti2004006008001000Min: 369.5 / Avg: 371 / Max: 373.5Min: 372.6 / Avg: 373.8 / Max: 374.9Min: 447.5 / Avg: 447.9 / Max: 448.2Min: 453.2 / Avg: 453.77 / Max: 454.4Min: 622.1 / Avg: 622.23 / Max: 622.4Min: 639.7 / Avg: 640.7 / Max: 641.4Min: 984.2 / Avg: 986.43 / Max: 990.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Googlenet, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.7291.4582.1872.9163.6451.141.531.701.751.962.463.24

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 151.6 / Avg: 325.99 / Max: 388Min: 133.7 / Avg: 244.62 / Max: 274.7Min: 99.2 / Avg: 263.81 / Max: 307.6Min: 136.4 / Avg: 259.54 / Max: 306.2Min: 144.5 / Avg: 318.02 / Max: 375Min: 136.9 / Avg: 260.13 / Max: 307.7Min: 99.4 / Avg: 304.21 / Max: 401.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti306090120150SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.72, N = 3SE +/- 0.81, N = 342.6343.9052.9353.8372.1785.20123.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti20406080100Min: 42.3 / Avg: 42.63 / Max: 42.8Min: 43.7 / Avg: 43.9 / Max: 44Min: 52.8 / Avg: 52.93 / Max: 53Min: 53.6 / Avg: 53.83 / Max: 54Min: 72 / Avg: 72.17 / Max: 72.3Min: 83.9 / Avg: 85.2 / Max: 86.4Min: 121.8 / Avg: 123.1 / Max: 124.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: Inception v4, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.11250.2250.33750.450.56250.150.200.220.220.270.400.50

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 108 / Avg: 278.24 / Max: 380.9Min: 132.4 / Avg: 221.97 / Max: 272.5Min: 138.9 / Avg: 243.51 / Max: 311.7Min: 132.4 / Avg: 241.44 / Max: 307.7Min: 99.4 / Avg: 272.26 / Max: 380.7Min: 92.5 / Avg: 210.62 / Max: 301.7Min: 140.1 / Avg: 247.2 / Max: 404

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti4080120160200SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 378.2777.1389.3392.97131.27138.33204.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti4080120160200Min: 77.2 / Avg: 78.27 / Max: 79Min: 76.9 / Avg: 77.13 / Max: 77.4Min: 89.1 / Avg: 89.33 / Max: 89.5Min: 92.8 / Avg: 92.97 / Max: 93.1Min: 130.9 / Avg: 131.27 / Max: 131.5Min: 138 / Avg: 138.33 / Max: 138.7Min: 204 / Avg: 204.1 / Max: 204.2

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP16GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.1530.3060.4590.6120.7650.240.340.370.370.420.550.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 206.8 / Avg: 322.78 / Max: 378.7Min: 91.5 / Avg: 229.25 / Max: 265.4Min: 112.1 / Avg: 242.95 / Max: 294.5Min: 92.5 / Avg: 248.1 / Max: 296.9Min: 190.3 / Avg: 310.17 / Max: 375.6Min: 138.7 / Avg: 249.29 / Max: 302.5Min: 101.9 / Avg: 299.78 / Max: 396.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti306090120150SE +/- 0.37, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 9.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 372.8371.7079.0382.77119.2790.67150.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti306090120150Min: 72.1 / Avg: 72.83 / Max: 73.3Min: 71.5 / Avg: 71.7 / Max: 71.9Min: 79 / Avg: 79.03 / Max: 79.1Min: 82.7 / Avg: 82.77 / Max: 82.8Min: 119 / Avg: 119.27 / Max: 119.4Min: 72.5 / Avg: 90.67 / Max: 99.8Min: 149.9 / Avg: 150.43 / Max: 151.1

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Watt, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Test: VGG-16, FP32GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.1080.2160.3240.4320.540.230.310.320.330.390.350.48

OpenBenchmarking.orgWatts, Fewer Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09System Power Consumption MonitorGTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 145.5 / Avg: 317.87 / Max: 381.9Min: 93.5 / Avg: 228.29 / Max: 264.8Min: 99.1 / Avg: 248.3 / Max: 292.9Min: 132.8 / Avg: 251.17 / Max: 299.3Min: 139.5 / Avg: 308.82 / Max: 375Min: 92.7 / Avg: 262.66 / Max: 313.7Min: 101.7 / Avg: 311.29 / Max: 404.4

Parboil

The Parboil Benchmarks from the IMPACT Research Group at University of Illinois are a set of throughput computing applications for looking at computing architecture and compilers. Parboil test-cases support OpenMP, OpenCL, and CUDA multi-processing environments. However, at this time the test profile is just making use of the OpenMP and OpenCL test workloads. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenCL TPACFGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.35780.71561.07341.43121.789SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 31.591.551.491.241.201.210.931.030.821. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenCL TPACFGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti246810Min: 1.54 / Avg: 1.59 / Max: 1.67Min: 1.51 / Avg: 1.55 / Max: 1.58Min: 1.37 / Avg: 1.49 / Max: 1.6Min: 1.22 / Avg: 1.24 / Max: 1.3Min: 1.17 / Avg: 1.2 / Max: 1.26Min: 1.15 / Avg: 1.21 / Max: 1.31Min: 0.88 / Avg: 0.93 / Max: 1Min: 0.99 / Avg: 1.03 / Max: 1.1Min: 0.74 / Avg: 0.82 / Max: 0.961. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -O3 -ffast-math -fopenmp

GPU Temperature Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgCelsiusGPU Temperature MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti1632486480Min: 30 / Avg: 44.97 / Max: 71Min: 37 / Avg: 56.32 / Max: 81Min: 41 / Avg: 76.41 / Max: 85Min: 34 / Avg: 61.6 / Max: 74Min: 38 / Avg: 54.27 / Max: 66Min: 37 / Avg: 61.56 / Max: 77Min: 39 / Avg: 66.34 / Max: 79Min: 34 / Avg: 54.61 / Max: 65Min: 38 / Avg: 58.82 / Max: 74

System Power Consumption Monitor

OpenBenchmarking.orgWattsSystem Power Consumption MonitorPhoronix Test Suite System MonitoringGTX 970GTX 980GTX TITAN XGTX 1070GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti70140210280350Min: 95.8 / Avg: 176.17 / Max: 300.3Min: 93.6 / Avg: 176.4 / Max: 313.7Min: 104.9 / Avg: 294.18 / Max: 388Min: 91.3 / Avg: 209.2 / Max: 276.4Min: 96.8 / Avg: 223.4 / Max: 312.9Min: 91 / Avg: 211.98 / Max: 308.2Min: 94 / Avg: 268 / Max: 380.7Min: 91.4 / Avg: 214.35 / Max: 313.7Min: 95.3 / Avg: 264.13 / Max: 406.6

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing

OpenBenchmarking.orgGFLOPS Per Dollar, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SPRX 580RX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.52431.04861.57292.09722.62151.832.331.791.331.311.411.851.201. RX 580: $299 reported cost.2. RX Vega 56: $399 reported cost.3. RX Vega 64: $519 reported cost.4. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.5. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.6. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.7. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.8. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgGHash/s Per Dollar, More Is BetterSHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 HashRX 580RX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.0090.0180.0270.0360.0450.030.030.030.030.030.030.040.031. RX 580: $299 reported cost.2. RX Vega 56: $399 reported cost.3. RX Vega 64: $519 reported cost.4. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.5. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.6. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.7. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.8. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

clpeak

OpenBenchmarking.orgGIOPS Per Dollar, More Is BetterclpeakPerformance / Cost - OpenCL Test: Integer Compute INTRX 580RX Vega 56RX Vega 64GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti481216204.194.974.825.584.894.7114.8512.241. RX 580: $299 reported cost.2. RX Vega 56: $399 reported cost.3. RX Vega 64: $519 reported cost.4. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.5. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.6. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.7. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.8. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

ASKAP tConvolveCuda

OpenBenchmarking.orgMillion Grid Points Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterASKAP tConvolveCuda 2015-11-10Performance / Cost - Processing: DegriddingGTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti112233445532.8928.6031.7447.0331.721. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: ResNet-50, FP16GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.12150.2430.36450.4860.60750.440.380.380.540.361. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: ResNet-50, FP32GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.07430.14860.22290.29720.37150.320.280.300.330.231. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: AlexNet, FP16GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti1.11152.2233.33454.4465.55754.233.723.774.943.611. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: AlexNet, FP32GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.8911.7822.6733.5644.4553.963.503.583.842.731. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: Googlenet, FP16GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.26330.52660.78991.05321.31651.070.910.891.170.821. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: Inception v4, FP16GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.0360.0720.1080.1440.180.130.110.100.160.101. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: VGG-16, FP16GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.05630.11260.16890.22520.28150.210.190.190.250.171. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

OpenBenchmarking.orgImages Per Second Per Dollar, More Is BetterNVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow 18.09Performance / Cost - Test: VGG-16, FP32GTX 1070 TiGTX 1080GTX 1080 TiRTX 2070RTX 2080 Ti0.04280.08560.12840.17120.2140.190.170.170.170.131. GTX 1070 Ti: $419 reported cost.2. GTX 1080: $499 reported cost.3. GTX 1080 Ti: $699 reported cost.4. RTX 2070: $549 reported cost.5. RTX 2080 Ti: $1199 reported cost.

47 Results Shown

SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing:
  OpenCL - FFT SP
  OpenCL - MD5 Hash
clpeak
Chaos Group V-RAY
Chaos Group V-RAY
ASKAP tConvolveCuda
CUDA Mini-Nbody
CUDA Mini-Nbody
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  ResNet-50, FP16
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  ResNet-50, FP32
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  AlexNet, FP16
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  AlexNet, FP32
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  Googlenet, FP16
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  Inception v4, FP16
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  VGG-16, FP16
  System Power Consumption Monitor
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow
NVIDIA GPU Cloud TensorFlow:
  VGG-16, FP32
  System Power Consumption Monitor
Parboil
GPU Temperature Monitor:
  Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring:
    Celsius
    Watts
  Performance / Cost - OpenCL - FFT SP:
    GFLOPS Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - OpenCL - MD5 Hash:
    GHash/s Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Integer Compute INT:
    GIOPS Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Degridding:
    Million Grid Points Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - ResNet-50, FP16:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - ResNet-50, FP32:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - AlexNet, FP16:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - AlexNet, FP32:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Googlenet, FP16:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - Inception v4, FP16:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - VGG-16, FP16:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar
  Performance / Cost - VGG-16, FP32:
    Images Per Second Per Dollar