cpu test 01 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 testing with a Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.3 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450 on LinuxMint 18.3 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 3.60GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 6 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A, Disk: 120GB KingDian S280 12, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection OS: LinuxMint 18.3, Kernel: 4.10.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 3.6.7, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.4, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 3.60GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DR3-F v0123456789 (3.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 6 x 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A, Disk: 120GB KingDian S280 12, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200eW WPCM450, Network: Intel I350 Gigabit Connection OS: LinuxMint 18.3, Kernel: 4.10.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: Cinnamon 3.6.7, Display Server: X Server 1.18.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.18.4, Compiler: GCC 5.4.0 20160609, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Aircrack-ng 1.3 k/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 30098 |================================================ AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 58.25 |================================================ asmFish 2017-09-19 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 49397299 |============================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.44 |================================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.06 |================================================ Botan 2.6.0 Test: KASUMI - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 74.78 |================================================ Botan 2.6.0 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 70.84 |================================================ Botan 2.6.0 Test: AES-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2131.62 |============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2123.37 |============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: Twofish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 258.92 |=============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 257.03 |=============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: Blowfish - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 205.41 |=============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 207.53 |=============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: CAST-256 - Encrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 103.35 |=============================================== Botan 2.6.0 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 102.43 |=============================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.7 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 23.46 |================================================ Timed GCC Compilation 7.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 734.71 |=============================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22.38 |================================================ Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.18 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 49.44 |================================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 6.0.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 296.98 |=============================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.0-rc3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 17.12 |================================================ Timed PHP Compilation 7.1.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 55.86 |================================================ Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Raytests Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.54 |================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5.41 |================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.38 |================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.36 |================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.98 |================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.21 |================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.53 |================================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 27174978.93 |========================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1 |==================================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Register Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1 |==================================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1 |==================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 61.00 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3052.28 |============================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22944.54 |============================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 26836.95 |============================================= CLOMP 3.3 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.41 |================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.88 |================================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 78775 |================================================ Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 42.37 |================================================ LZMA Compression 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 296.66 |=============================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.86 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 110.86 |=============================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6495209 |============================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4826 |================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5826 |================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Eclipse msec < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 23174 |================================================ DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5369 |================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7005 |================================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 56.78 |================================================ Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 24.04 |================================================ ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 503317 |=============================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 36.77 |================================================ eSpeak Speech Engine 1.48.04 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 40.95 |================================================ FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7.94 |================================================= FFTE 6.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5466.02 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7027.13 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7109.80 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7306.97 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6128.30 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6406.80 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6115.20 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5969.67 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5512.83 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5143.20 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5291.30 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6143.23 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5711.83 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5549.17 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 5445.97 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4048.40 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3781.97 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 9649.86 |============================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12317 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 21525 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20115 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 14869 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 18384 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20233 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 16757 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15075 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15691 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20716 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 20251 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19107 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15778 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11319 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 9699.07 |============================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12348.87 |============================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 133707 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.30 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 133873 |=============================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 13.37 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 56.24 |================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7.02 |================================================= glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7.02 |================================================= GNU GMP GMPbench 6.1.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3500.90 |============================================== GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 16.28 |================================================ Go Benchmarks Test: http Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6883 |================================================= Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 10519826 |============================================= Go Benchmarks Test: build Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19231352106 |========================================== Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1207636 |============================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 184 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 201 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 144 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 151 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 202 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 106 |================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.30 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 214 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.20 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.31 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7.18 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15.90 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.02 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 32.04 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.00 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.60 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 14.55 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 24.61 |================================================ Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 37.85 |================================================ Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1602.74 |============================================== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 12.18 |================================================ High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.0 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.86 |================================================= Java Gradle Build 1.0 Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 25.71 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1819.38 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 843.70 |=============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1107.66 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1716.02 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4063.00 |============================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1366.53 |============================================== John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 24104 |================================================ John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: Traditional DES Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 95911333 |============================================= John The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 846484 |=============================================== LLVM Test Suite 6.0.0 Time To Run Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 339.54 |=============================================== LuaJIT 2.0.5 Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1121.22 |============================================== LuaJIT 2.0.5 Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 423.92 |=============================================== LuaJIT 2.0.5 Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 416.32 |=============================================== LuaJIT 2.0.5 Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1076.87 |============================================== LuaJIT 2.0.5 Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2164.62 |============================================== LuaJIT 2.0.5 Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1524.39 |============================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 29 |=================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 81 |=================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 291 |================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 824 |================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 345 |================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 402 |================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 166 |================================================== lzbench 2017-08-08 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 815 |================================================== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 47.71 |================================================ Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.83 |================================================= Mencoder 1.3.0 AVI To LAVC Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22.50 |================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 68.41 |================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 96.05 |================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 150.21 |=============================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 6.35 |================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 65.13 |================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 65.18 |================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 67.94 |================================================ Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 73.06 |================================================ N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 9.71 |================================================= NAMD 2.13b1 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1.13909 |============================================== NoiseLevel Activity Level < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 680761335 |============================================ Numpy Benchmark Nanoseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7785183 |============================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2630.27 |============================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 118.01 |=============================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.84 |================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI-Q Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 8.38 |================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11.01 |================================================ Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 189.92 |=============================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.19865433 |=========================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.00112390 |=========================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.98 |================================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2.59 |================================================= PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3.35 |================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 38.05 |================================================ Primesieve 7.1 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 19.59 |================================================ PSSTOP Memory test kb < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 560916 |=============================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1040.17 |============================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 329.42 |=============================================== R Benchmark Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 0.5352 |=============================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 99.12 |================================================ Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22.03 |================================================ Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 22.69 |================================================ Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 53.83 |================================================ Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 11.76 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 570.86 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 119.60 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 292.54 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 583.52 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 784.87 |=============================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1073.80 |============================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 27.31 |================================================ Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 39611287 |============================================= Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 15.79 |================================================ Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 581797046 |============================================ System BZIP2 Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 10.83 |================================================ System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 4.40 |================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 650 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 2059 |================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3091 |================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 7 |==================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 31 |=================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 115 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 95077 |================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 93 |=================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 136 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 158 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 200 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 222 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 411 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 286 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 506 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 350 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 625 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 418 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 430 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 486 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 501 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 876 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 590 |================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB ms < Lower Is Better Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 599 |================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4526.44 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4885.38 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4815.30 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 5234.60 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4986.96 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4420.60 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4729.62 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4544.99 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 5011.57 |================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 4751.45 |================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 28291.03 |================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 27491.74 |================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 31901.60 |================================ Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 31704.40 |================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 5825.47 |================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 8192 MB DDR3-1333MHz HMT31GR7BFR4A . 9616.13 |=================================